Enter VIN number
Get the most accurate report for the vehicle. Basic information is FREE




We found the following complaints for WINNEBAGO VISTA (2020)

Read complaints for WINNEBAGO VISTA (2020)


The contact owns a 2020 winnebago vista. The contact stated that upon purchase of the vehicle, an abnormal spray paint odor emitted from the chaste of the rv. As the odor persisted, the contact took the vehicle to lazydays rv of tucson(3200 e irvington rd, tucson, az 85714) where he had several internal repairs performed on the rv; however, the dealer stated that they could not smell a spray painting odor. The contact then had an indoor air quality inspector provide an estimate for testing of the rv. The contact submitted the estimate for the air quality testing to the manufacturer and the manufacturer refused to pay for the testing. The contact then made an appointment with winnebago industries(1045 s 4th st, forest city, ia 50436) and drove the rv to the iowa location for the appointment. Before taking the vehicle to the appointment, the contact had his own air quality test performed on the rv and submitted the results to the factory service center. The results showed that an elevated level of formaldehyde and a severe high level of voc(volatile organic compound) were present in the rv. The contact stated that his wife, two children and himself have experienced severe health issues due to their exposure to these chemicals. The contact stated that one his sons had developed asthma due to the exposure and that his other son's autism had worsened due to the exposure. The contact also mentioned that he and his wife had experienced severe headaches, shortness of breath, dizziness, nausea, persistent cough, mode disturbances and evensuicidal ideations due to the exposure. The contact stated that all of these symptoms occurred while inside of the rv. Medical attention was declined. The manufacturer have offered no assistance with his findings. The vehicle had yet to be repaired. The failure mileage was 1,000. *dtthe consumer stated the manufacturer would run a chemical safety test and then decided not to run the test. The consumer provided a chemical safety test he performed. *dt

The contact owns a 2020 winnebago vista. The contact stated that upon purchase of the vehicle, an abnormal spray paint odor emitted from the chaste of the rv. As the odor persisted, the contact took the vehicle to lazydays rv of tucson(3200 e irvington rd, tucson, az 85714) where he had several internal repairs performed on the rv; however, the dealer stated that they could not smell a spray painting odor. The contact then had an indoor air quality inspector provide an estimate for testing of the rv. The contact submitted the estimate for the air quality testing to the manufacturer and the manufacturer refused to pay for the testing. The contact then made an appointment with winnebago industries(1045 s 4th st, forest city, ia 50436) and drove the rv to the iowa location for the appointment. Before taking the vehicle to the appointment, the contact had his own air quality test performed on the rv and submitted the results to the factory service center. The results showed that an elevated level of formaldehyde and a severe high level of voc(volatile organic compound) were present in the rv. The contact stated that his wife, two children and himself have experienced severe health issues due to their exposure to these chemicals. The contact stated that one his sons had developed asthma due to the exposure and that his other son's autism had worsened due to the exposure. The contact also mentioned that he and his wife had experienced severe headaches, shortness of breath, dizziness, nausea, persistent cough, mode disturbances and evensuicidal ideations due to the exposure. The contact stated that all of these symptoms occurred while inside of the rv. Medical attention was declined. The manufacturer have offered no assistance with his findings. The vehicle had yet to be repaired. The failure mileage was 1,000. *dtthe consumer stated the manufacturer would run a chemical safety test and then decided not to run the test. The consumer provided a chemical safety test he performed. *dt




Read more




© 2024 All rights reserved