We found the following complaints for SUBARU SUBARU (Unknown)
Read complaints for SUBARU SUBARU (Unknown)
The air bag did not deploy during in an accident.
2008 subaru impreza.consumer writes in regards to replacement part not available to repair front passenger air bag recall notice. The consumer stated 8 months passed and the air bag had not been replaced. Updated 3/24/2017
2004 subaru legacy.consumer writes in regards to driver airbag replacement issues.*ldthe consumer believed since the passenger air bag was replaced under recall the driver's side airbag should'vebeen replaced as well. Updated 06/19/2017
Subaru.consumer writes in regards to replacement parts /remedy not available to repair passenger airbag recall.
Subaru. Consumer writes in regards to dealership not offering loaner vehicles while repairing airbag safety recall. *ld
Subaru outback.consumer writes in regards to customer service department unable to remedy/repairseveral recall notice and assist in vehicle shipping cost.
Consumer is concerned about the switch on the vehicle.sometimes it locks and consumer has a hard time getting it unlocked.the subaru dealer said there was nothing that could be done.*jg
Consumer states that there is a malfunction in the electrical system causing the tail and parking light fuses to fail, this occurs while vehicle is in motion.
Subaru outback.consumer writes in regards to customer service department unable to remedy/repairseveral recall notice and assist in vehicle shipping cost.
Subaru. Consumer writes in regards to head gasket failure. *ld
Timing belt broke prematurely.
Consumer states at times vehicle will not start, also while driving vehicle will stall right in the middle of the highway, also there are strange sounds coming from the engine, consumer states dealership is unable to find what the problem is and they are now just guessing at what it might be, consumer is demanding a new vehicle.
Consumer is complaining about the new towing instructions given for the vehicle after the front tow hooks are removed.if the instructions are followed as stated, possible front end damage or realigning of the front would be a necessity.consumer feels repositioning the tow hooks would have a better out come.*jg
Subaru crosstrek.consumer writes in regards to navigation system updates.the consumer stated the dealer informed her, she would be offered updates to the navigation system every year. To date, she has not been offered an update. The navigation system, was giving the consumer incorrect information. The dealer reset the navigation system.
Consumer states lights on vehicle have never worked.
Subaru.consumer writes in regards to vehicle light recall.the consumer stated the rocker panels were apart of the vehicle's body that waslocated on each side of the vehicle, between the front and rear wheels, and below the side doors. Also, the recall was not influenced, the manufacturer determined the defect and made the decision to recall of their own accord. Recall # 12v602000.
Consumer states the seat belt failed during in an accident.
Consumer complains that one piece lap/shoulder belt only goes over left shoulder leaving right shoulder free to be injured during a rollover.
Subaru consumer wants to know why her vehicle wasn't included in the brake recall.
Subaru outback.consumer writes in regards to customer service department unable to remedy/repairseveral recall notice and assist in vehicle shipping cost.
Wheel bearing problem on subaru's. *njin certain cases, the bearing grease from a bad wheel bearing on late 1990 to early 2001-2003 model subaru's would contaminate the abs sensors in the hub causingthe abs to activate during routine braking. When that happened, it lead to increased stopping distance and a change in braking pressure for what was supposed to routine hard braking.
Consumer states vehicle has experienced steering problems.
Subaru had installed a hood deflector on either a 1993 subaru imprezza or a 2001 subaru forester, consumer did not specify which of his vehicles had the installation, while driving on two occasions hood deflector had slapped against the hood causing scratches and nicks, the first time it was taken back to the dealer to be fixed, now consumer wants the hood to be repainted instead of the dealer just wanting to touch it up because of their faulty installation.
Consumer request reimbursement of repairs from dealership for defective control arm recall notice.the consumer stated the dealer informed him, they would charge up to $3000 to perform the recall work. The consumer stated according to the recall notice, the inspection and repair would be performed at no cost. Subaru informed the consumer, the money he was being charged was in accordance with the parent company's procedures and was standard and excepted by the recall.
Problems with vehicle front coil springs. It appears that subaru is aware of the defect caused by improperly applied paint on the front coil springs the defect can cause springs to break if it comes in contact with tire could cause severe damage.consumer fells instead of them giving front coil springs guards they should replace a new coil spring. *mr
Consumer brought vehicle in for recall repairs to install the front spring guards, dealer did not perform recall repairs due to after market struts on vehicle, dealer stated that front spring guards could be installed at owners expense, and it could be potentially dangerious if guards are not installed.
Consumer brought vehicle in for recall repairs to install the front spring guards, dealer did not perform recall repairs due to after market struts on vehicle, dealer stated that front spring guards could be installed at owners expense, and it could be potentially dangerious if guards are not installed.
Wheel bearing problem on subaru's. *njin certain cases, the bearing grease from a bad wheel bearing on late 1990 to early 2001-2003 model subaru's would contaminate the abs sensors in the hub causingthe abs to activate during routine braking. When that happened, it lead to increased stopping distance and a change in braking pressure for what was supposed to routine hard braking.
The consumer experienced damaged windows.the windows were replaced and other parts because of the hazard.the consumer(s) have proof of forty other vehicles in their area that have experienced the same damages.scc
Cpsc: every time i have had to use subaru's loaner car service they give you their latest model cars to use whileyour car is being serviced if it takes more than a day. When i first had to use a loaner car, i drove it as i do withmy current 3rd generation, 2010 model forester, but i ended up cutting my finger on this piece of plastic theyadded to the redesigned steering wheel. I did complain to the service representatives about it, but i don't think itmade much of a concern for them. The next few time i had more loaners all different models but still newer carsthey all had me in the same situation were my finger would get scraped or cut but that obnoxious piece ofplastic.the vehicle control device such as the steering wheel should absolutely not have any types of hazards on it. *dtthe consumer stated the horn was very big and obtrusive. The steering does not have access to siri to be hands free.
Consumer writes in regards to vehicle acceleration / deceleration issues.consumer seeks vehicle reimbursement.*ldthe consumer stated the vehicle delays after slowing down in speed almost to a stop. Upon pressing the accelerator to increase speed, nothing happens for 2-3 seconds. The vehicle would delay when slowing down in traffic. The consumer was offered 20,000 to buy the vehicle back the consumer requested the full amount the vehicle was aid for.
Fax foia request for certified copies all records involving model year 2001-2004 outbacks and impreza wrx vehicle mfrd by subaru safety defectcruise control cable or stuck throttle problem.(nar)*ph
The consumer experienced damaged windows.the windows were replaced and other parts because of the hazard.the consumer(s) have proof of forty other vehicles in their area that have experienced the same damages.scc
Read more
