We found the following complaints for MITSUBISHI MITSUBISHI (Unknown)
Read complaints for MITSUBISHI MITSUBISHI (Unknown)
Consumer was involved in an accident in which the air bags did not deploy, upon inspection og the vehicle the mechanic discovered that there were no sensors on the vehicle and there was no wiring for the air bag, the window sticker that was attached to the vehicle at the time of purchase indicated that air bags were equipped on the vehicle.nlm
Consumer repairs computers for mitisbuishi vehicles but is calling to report thatcomputers used invehicles are less than adequate.consumer states that capacitors leak and cause a premature failure with the vehicle control system, consumer states the capacitors are of a very poor grade, consumer is speaking for all mitsubishi vehicles.
Front rocker arms failed.
Mitsubishi. Consumer writes in regards to fuel filler pipe safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated the vehicle was repaired under recall. The failure recurred. Updated 09/26/2017
Seat belt recall repair was not done properly.
Seat belt recall repair was not done properly.
Seat belt recall repair was not done properly.
Seat belt recall repair was not done properly.
Seat belt repaired after recall.
Eclipse model, axle broke causing vehicle to loose control and go into ditch, injury resulted from accident.
Consumer took the vehicle to the dealer for recall repairs, owner indicated the repairs did not include or indicate damage to the ball joint boot, the recall component (sr-99-002).mitsubishi inspected the vehicle and found the rubber boot to be intact but the lower control arm was broken. Based on the facts obtained during inspection process, mitsubishi respectfully declined the customer?s request for reimbursement. *yd
Consumer took the vehicle to the dealer for recall repairs, owner indicated the repairs did not include or indicate damage to the ball joint boot, the recall component (sr-99-002).mitsubishi inspected the vehicle and found the rubber boot to be intact but the lower control arm was broken. Based on the facts obtained during inspection process, mitsubishi respectfully declined the customer?s request for reimbursement. *yd
Recall repair work completed (99v-066), during repair damage to upper rubber boots which were torn. Mjs
Vehicle suffered tire tread separation, which resulted in the tread striking another vehicle.*mr ( 2003 mitsubishitruck)
Owner believes his vehicle should be involved in recall number 98v069000.
Consumer writes in regards to mitsubishi failing to comply with nhtsas reporting guidelines when safety defects or noncompliance exists in a motor vehicle. *ld the consumer stated that mitsubishi consistently fails to comply with its timely reporting requirements.
S10 appropriate handling - copy of a letter to deputy administrator king regarding past and ongoing untimely recalls by mitsubishi and failure to act. *ld
All four wheels on the vehicle were corroded with rust.nlm
Read more
