Enter VIN number
Get the most accurate report for the vehicle. Basic information is FREE
Use this form now and GET 20% DISCOUNT for CarVertical reports!




We found the following complaints for MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS (2001)

Read complaints for MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS (2001)


The vehicle was hit in the front center yet the air bags did not deploy which caused injuries to the consumer.the dealer has been notified.*nlm

The consumer stated that the airbag in the steering wheel, did not deploy.consumer said that another vehicle had pulled out in front of him in a parking lot, in which he couldn't stop the vehicle in time enough.the consumer sustained chest injuries.*scc

Vehicle proceeding north on city street.collided with side of vehicle #2west bound at intersection.driver's side airbag failed to deploy.passenger side deployed.

Consumer was involved in a collision while driving 35mph, the passenger air bag deployed, however the driver air bag did not, consumer was injured and had to miss 47 days of work, ford sen consumer a refusal of liability stating that there was not enough impact force to trigger air bag deployment, this vehicle only had 190 miles at time of incident, however consumer no longer feels safe with it, dealer replaced the control module, no representatives ever came from ford to inspect vehicle, two recalls, 00v27 and 00v412, deal with air bag problems.

The air bag light illuminated on the dashboard.

My father in law was driving my vehicle when a gmc yukon pulled out in front of him. My father in law hit the side of the yukon and only one air bag deployed which was the passanger side,my father in law was taken to the hospital bc of no feeling below his waist and the paramedics were unable to stabilize his blood pressure.

Car was hit on the driver side quarter panel causing it to spin and crash head on into highway divider.air bags did not deploy resulting inadditional injuries!!

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis.while driving 30 mph, the brakes made a squealing sound and locked when the pedal was depressed.the failure caused the contact to rear end the preceding vehicle.the air bags failed to deploy.there were no injuries.a police report was filed.the vehicle has not been diagnosed by the dealer.the current and failure mileages were 50,000.

Vehicle wasinvolved in a air borne position/ rollovered and a rear ended on the passenger's side with a slight frontal damage. Neither air bags deployed. Feel free to provide any further information.

Why one airbag(right) deployed and not the drivers air bag.

Consumer was involved in a frontal accident.the driver side air bad did not deploy but the passenger side air bag inflated.the right air bag was replaced.the seat belt left bad bruises across the chest of consumer.going 30 to 35 mph, consumer was thrown into the steering wheel.a new seat belt was installed on the drivers side and is operating normally. *jg

A vehicle collided with the rear of a stopped vehicle. The passenger side airbag deployed but the driver's side airbag did not.

While driving 12 mph the vehicle was involved in a head on collision.the driver's side air bag did not deploy and as a result the driver sustained injuries to the chest.please provide any additional information. *nlm

Tl - the vehicle was a 2001 mercury grand marquis.while driving the gas pedal became stuck.the vehicle then side swiped twoother vehicles.the vehiclewent off the road and hit a tree.the passenger side front was damaged. The air bags did not deploy.the failure mileagewas 25,000.thepassenger and driver sustained injuries.the vehicle was towed.pictureswere taken ,and a police report was filed.

Consumer was traveling through a parking lot at approximately 10-15 mph.the consumer swerved to avoid another vehicle and collided with a post.the driver's air bag deployed causing injury to consumer's face that required stiches. *nlm

The vehicle was in a head on collision and only the passenger side air bagdeployed upon impact.the passenger side airbag deployment caused the accident. The air bag deployed for no reason. *scc

Consumer was involved in a collision while driving 35mph, the passenger air bag deployed, however the driver air bag did not, consumer was injured and had to miss 47 days of work, ford sen consumer a refusal of liability stating that there was not enough impact force to trigger air bag deployment, this vehicle only had 190 miles at time of incident, however consumer no longer feels safe with it, dealer replaced the control module, no representatives ever came from ford to inspect vehicle, two recalls, 00v27 and 00v412, deal with air bag problems.

While driving 15 mph vehicle was involved in a head on collision. Upon impact, air bags did not deploy. *mr

The vehicle was involved in a frontal collision while drivingat an unknown speed.only the passenger air bagdeployed upon impact. The complaint was given by the repair shop by a person named pete.*sc

2001 mercury grand marquis check engine light illuminated. Consumer states that the vehicle has been worked on, on two separate occasions to repair this problem but the problem still persists.the consumer believed there is an inherent electrical problem with the vehicle.

Turning signal started to flashing really fast, took vehicle to dealer and repaired under warranty.now out of warranty and happening intermittently again. *nlm

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that while driving approximately 70 mph, the vehicle stalled. The contact was able to restart the vehicle several minutes later. The failure recurred three different times while driving at various speeds. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 54,400.

2001 grand marquis,the adjustable pedalis not traveling more then one inch insread of three inches (nowseveral timesi was missing the brake pedal sincei am unable to lower it.

2001 mercury grand marquis.frequently a plume of smoke comes out the left side of the steering post. There is also a burning odor. It only lasts for a second.there is no equipment failure so far.i have taken the car to two different ford dealers and they tell me this is not uncommon, don"t worry about it.i have written to ford corp. And they tell me nothing but take it to a ford servicedept. I am in fearof a major fire while i am driving.where do i go from here? thank you.

1 passenger seat belt not functioning properly2 speed control not working3 passenger side headlight not working in low beam only high beam

While driving at night, my lights turned off by themselves on a dark rural road. If i hadn't jammed on the brakes, i would have eaten the railing or worse. Turns out the (lcm) lighting control module, is defective. When i looked it up online, it seems that many cars are having this issue, even my local police department. This is a big safety issue and needs to be addressed immediately. The dealer wanted to charge $578 plus 2 hours labor for a part that goes under the dash.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that while driving at various speeds, the digital speedometerwould read display a high number then without warning display "0", the failure would occur intermittently. The contact also stated that the headlights were turning off and on intermittently without warning. The vehicle was taken to a dealer for the speedometer failure, where a diagnosis was not determined. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 209,000.

While drivingat 40 mph, the vehicle shimmied in the front.the vehicle was taken to the dealership, where the mechanic re-balanced and aligned the tires.the problem still existed after being taken to an independent mechanic.this was an on going problem since the beginning of purchase.the consumer had an adjudication to take the vehicle back to the dealership.the vehicle had been back to the dealer on many occasions for the shimmy in the front.the dealership replaced all four tires and the driveshaft assembly.the vehicle developed an oil leak that was also ongoing, so the dealer replaced the oil pan/oil pan gasket and the rear main crank shaft seal.the ignition coil assembly had to be replaced as well.when the weather was cold, the hood would not pop open and the right front door did not close properly.*scc

While driving 35 mph, the consumer heard a loud noise coming from the front of the vehicle. It vibrated uncontrollably.consumer was able to maintain control of the vehicle and drove it to the dealer for inspection. The mechanic determined that the coil needed to be replaced. The dealer replaced the #6 coil because theengine light illuminated.*tc

This mercury grandmarquis ls has had 4 failures of coil packs. These can cause servious damage to auto by puting the auto out of balance or stranding you on the highway. This auto has had several failures that resulted in costly repairs, and no recall existed when in fact this is a very very common problem on all marques. Research says that all fords made in canada have serious electrical problems due to inferior partswhich i presume are imported. I do have old parts for your inspection from one of the replaced coils. One dealer in dallas refused to provide old parts. I do have receipts for all repairs.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. While driving 65 mph and the headlights suddenly shut off.the vehicle was towed.the contact drove to a dealer and the dealer informed the contact that a 25 amp fuse was in place of a 20 amp fuse and caused the headlights to stop working.the dealer replaced the fuse and no other failures have occurred. The contact also stated that the vehicle has never experienced any electrical problems and he does not feel comfortable driving it.the failure mileage was 149,000.

A lot have happened still trying to figure out the problem it want crank now

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 70 mph, the vehicle was jerking and the abs and the check engine warning lights illuminated. The vehicle had a drastic reduction in speed. The vehicle was restarted. The vehicle was taken to the dealer on several occasions where it was repaired but the repair details were unknown. The repairs failed to remedy the vehicle. The contact statedthe service engine warning light continued to illuminated and the vehicle jerked violently, reduced speed and attempted to stall. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 136,037.updated 12/03/15*lj

A lot have happened still trying to figure out the problem it want crank now

The 1996-2001 mercury grand marquis with a 100% plastic intake manifoldis known for engine overheating, even with normal use, and a coolant leak from the front of the manifold. This will often trigger the check engine light and low engine coolant warning light.the engine coolant leak is from a factory defect, which causes cracking on the front coolant passage of the intake manifold. In a very short time, this leak will lead to engine overheating issues, especially while the vehicle is idling. This is exactly what happened.i think the car part should have been replaced by ford when they new about the plastic intake manifold.

Leaking coolant from the plastic intake manifold. Ford want's $500.00+ for a new one. I can get one from ebay for $150.00.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that the steering shaft was damaged. When turning, the vehicle traveled in the opposite direction of where the contact steered. The vehicle also failed to drive in a straight line and swayed from one side of the road to the other. Also, the check oil indicator illuminated. The vehicle was taken to fairway ford(366 w main st, canfield, oh 44406, (330) 533-3673), but no assistance was provided. The vehicle was diagnosed, but not repaired because the vehicle was out of warranty. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact planned to call the manufacturer. The failure mileage was 80,000.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that white smoke appeared from the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who stated that the failure was due to the intake manifold. The vehicle was taken to malouf ford lincoln, inc (2210 us-1, north brunswick township, nj 08902, (732) 951-0300) where it was suggested the plastic defective intake manifold was the cause of the failure. The contact called the manufacturer and asked to speak to a case manager. The manufacturer was to call the contact back or mail a response. The failure mileage was 135,000.

My father in law was driving my vehicle when a gmc yukon pulled out in front of him. My father in law hit the side of the yukon and only one air bag deployed which was the passanger side,my father in law was taken to the hospital bc of no feeling below his waist and the paramedics were unable to stabilize his blood pressure.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that the intake manifold was leaking antifreeze onto the coil pack on cylinder number eight. The contact stated that there was a manufacturer warranty that was placed on these vehicles regarding the failure. The contact spoke with davis ford (2111 n main st, canton, il 61520, (309) 647-1111) and was informed to call the manufacturer to have the vehicle serviced under warranty. The manufacturer was notified and informed the contact to call nhtsa to enforce the manufacturer warranty. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 133,000.

Small piece of plastic from intake went into the cylinder #4 and rapped around one of the values causing this value to stay open so cylinder #4 has no compression.

Re: defect in the ford motors, inc. Engine produced at romeo engine plant, romeo michigan.the vehicle leaked oil out of the right, rear area of the head near the valve cover.six months prior, the consumer's wife smelled oil burning.the consumer stated that he changes his own oil, and never noticed an oil leak. *sc

The head gasket on the consumer's 2001 mercury grand marquis leaked oil. *scthe problem was caused by metal chips left between the head gaskets and block.

Temp gauge is not connected. I recently had to have thereplace the intake manifold and the shop informed me that there was nothing to connect it to.

While driving my 2001 mercury grand marquis i heard a noise from the engine compartment immediately the engine sounded very loud as if there was an exhaust leak, the engine started running very rough and the check engine light came on, after checking found that the rear spark plug on the right side of the engine had been blown out of its socket and it broke the ignition coil, gas would spray out of the spark plug cavity creating an unsafe condition, i had to buy a repair tool kit and a new coil and spark plug to repair the problem because the dealer (nick mayer in west lake, ohio would not fix it even though i only had the car for 6 days, they said that it was a used car with no warranty so they would not work with me, it ended up costing me over $100.00 to fix a problem that the dealer or manufacturer should had been force to correct.

Consistent problem with turn signal and air-conditioning malfunction. Fuse blows-no turn signal or air conditioning. Possible electrical problem and safety/fire hazard. Cerame dealership in st. Louis, mo has not been unable to locate the problem. Dealership service has replaced one wireand a sensor. Problem still exists. Taking vehicle back to dealership to resolve 6/23/03.

Engine coolant light kept coming on. Vehicleshut down. This occurred when driving at any speed.vehicle beganto down shift. It drove erratically. Consumer took vehicle to dealership on several occasions.dealership provided some services that were non effective to the problem.

Intake manifold cracked, and busted, resulted in towing.

2001 mercury grand marquis. Consumer stated faulty thermostat *tgwthe consumer stated when the mechanic attempted to replace the thermostat, problems were encountered. The thermostat housing bolts would not readily unscrew. The consumer was informed that if more force was exerted, the plastic-like intake manifold through which the bolts fastened, would crack/break and require a very expensive intake manifold replacement.the consumer decided to wait on the repair and contacted three local ford dealerships for second opinions.all three informed the consumer they would be careful, but they could not guarantee him that they would not crack the intake manifold in attempting to replace the thermostat.updated 08/10/10.

While drivingat 40 mph, the vehicle shimmied in the front.the vehicle was taken to the dealership, where the mechanic re-balanced and aligned the tires.the problem still existed after being taken to an independent mechanic.this was an on going problem since the beginning of purchase.the consumer had an adjudication to take the vehicle back to the dealership.the vehicle had been back to the dealer on many occasions for the shimmy in the front.the dealership replaced all four tires and the driveshaft assembly.the vehicle developed an oil leak that was also ongoing, so the dealer replaced the oil pan/oil pan gasket and the rear main crank shaft seal.the ignition coil assembly had to be replaced as well.when the weather was cold, the hood would not pop open and the right front door did not close properly.*scc

Consumer stated there was a rattling noise coming from the engine when cold, dealer informed consumer the timing gear needed to be replaced,also the dashboard vibrated, however dealer stated nothing was wrong, the trim panel was loose on the door, the left front door closed too hard, the vehicle would lean to the left and there was a noise coming from the front of the vehicle when turninga corner,dealer replaced the front frame supports, the instrument cluster was scratched, the steering column trim was replaced, the radio had a poor reception, there was a pulsation coming from the brakes, however the dealer could not duplicate the problem. Ph

While making a right turn into a parking space the engine lost power which resulted in the steering wheel and gear shift locking up. The dealer stated they could not duplicate the problem. Consumer got out of car and rocked it back and forth for a few minute.het got back into the car and tried to move both the wheel and the gear shift.after about 5 minutes of this they both unlocked and the car was ok for 5-6 months.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The composite intake manifold which is where the thermostat mounts into the head of the motor has failed. The vehicle was repaired by a local mechanic. The contact stated that the dealers fee would exceed the local mechanic's fee. The contac has been unsuccessful at notifying the manufacturer. The failure mileage was 102,000. Update 12/14/09updated 12/1/6/09

Consumer states she has an idle air control valve problem.she states that sometimes when she attempts to start her vehicle, it acts as if it wants to cut off.then there are times when she is driving and has to stop, then the vehicle cuts off. *ph the consumer talked to another consumer with the same problem and had come to the conclusion that a recall should be issued. *scc

My sister and i'm writing this report on her behalf. Her car is a 2001 mercury grand marquis. Last month, (feb '07) while driving, the car's engine shut down several times. Each time she heard a "beep" andwarning lights came on- check engine, traction control and another she can't recall.after a minute or so, the engine would start normally. She took it to the ford dealer, sawgrass ford in sunrise, fl. The problem recurred and she again took the car to the dealer. The last time they found a transmission problem and repaired it. (the transmission had been givingproblem, but she took the car to repair the shut-down problem). Yesterday (mar 1, 2007) the engine shut down 4 times ! each time she heard the "beep" and warning lights illuminated including traction control and check engine lights. She was on her way home and it nearly caused an accident as another car almost ran into her. The car is to go back to sawgrass ford (for the third time) on monday, mar 5 '07. The car will be towed, not driven, as this is a very dangerous condition, especially as power steering and power brakes are lost on shut-down.interestingly, i had the same problem with my 2000 grand marquis im may and june 2005 . I reported this to you (nhtsa) and you wrote me back, assigning ref.# 10141074. My problem was found to have been caused by a single defective spark plug ! the plug was replaced and the car has functioned normally since. The real problem was with the programming of the power control module which was confused and overwhelmed by one bad spark plug. In 2005 i wrote numerous letters to ford and they were completely unresponsive.engine shut-downs on mercury grand marquis are a serious safety issue and should be corrected. Sincerely,

When stopping or braking the vehicle shut off. The vehicle was taken to the dealer.the dealer indicated that the vehicle's warranty was expired.the consumer felt that the dealer should repair the vehicle free of charge since the original defect occurred while the vehicle was still under warranty.

The engine idles roughly and the vehicle developed an oil leak after it had been worked on by the dealer.

While driving 45 mph, vehicle suddenly gave a jerk and engine died.consumer was able to restart vehicle.consumer felt if this happened on highway someone could have been killed. The vehicle has jerked several more times since then.the dealer conducted numerous tests but could not locate the cause.the engine has not died since the first incident.*jg

Engine head gasket leaks oil/fluid down onto the catalylic converter, which could lead to a fire. There is a tsb on this particular issue.

Air conditioner fan behind glove compartment is left open, and consumers scarf was sucked into fan, causing it to become inoperable. Contacted dealer who was not willing to do anything.

Consistent problem with turn signal and air-conditioning malfunction. Fuse blows-no turn signal or air conditioning. Possible electrical problem and safety/fire hazard. Cerame dealership in st. Louis, mo has not been unable to locate the problem. Dealership service has replaced one wireand a sensor. Problem still exists. Taking vehicle back to dealership to resolve 6/23/03.

Consumer stated there was a rattling noise coming from the engine when cold, dealer informed consumer the timing gear needed to be replaced,also the dashboard vibrated, however dealer stated nothing was wrong, the trim panel was loose on the door, the left front door closed too hard, the vehicle would lean to the left and there was a noise coming from the front of the vehicle when turninga corner,dealer replaced the front frame supports, the instrument cluster was scratched, the steering column trim was replaced, the radio had a poor reception, there was a pulsation coming from the brakes, however the dealer could not duplicate the problem. Ph

Was driving down hwy 12 at night september 26 2019 and all i remembered was my lights shutting off due to lighting control module which i learned after the fact didnt have major accident but did hit small ditch and bent up my bumper

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. While driving 60 mph, the front and rear warning and signal lamps failed to illuminate. In addition, both high and low beam head lamps failed to illuminate. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the light control module failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 96,321.

Put on dim and lights wont come on at all, so i can not drive at night. Breaks lights, signals, emergency light, dash board works only when i turn on windshield wipers , . Had bulbs and modular replaced still no lights. This started driving at night on streetso happened to be close to home.

The contact's father owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that while her son was driving the vehicle at an unknown speed, the lighting control module (lcm) became inoperable without warning. The contact's son was able reactivate the lcm; however, the failure recurred intermittently. The contact was informed by an independent mechanic that certain 2003 mercury grand marquis were included in nhtsa campaign number: 15v861000 (exterior lighting), however, the 2001 model year vehicle was not included in the recall. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was unknown. The vin was not available.

Headlight problem going on and off.and the steering seems off. I need your help fixing this problem.this isn't good.i love mercury ford.but i've tried contacting them and no response yet.

While driving at night, my lights turned off by themselves on a dark rural road. If i hadn't jammed on the brakes, i would have eaten the railing or worse. Turns out the (lcm) lighting control module, is defective. When i looked it up online, it seems that many cars are having this issue, even my local police department. This is a big safety issue and needs to be addressed immediately. The dealer wanted to charge $578 plus 2 hours labor for a part that goes under the dash.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that while driving at various speeds, the digital speedometerwould read display a high number then without warning display "0", the failure would occur intermittently. The contact also stated that the headlights were turning off and on intermittently without warning. The vehicle was taken to a dealer for the speedometer failure, where a diagnosis was not determined. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 209,000.

I was driving at night and the lights went off dash, tail, instrument and signal lights and then killed my battery

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated the headlights were dim while driving at night which made it difficult to see. The lights would also reflect off of the pavement.when approaching oncoming traffic the passing vehicles lights caused a blinding effect. The dealer stated that was how the vehicle was designed and would not offer any assistance. The failure mileage was 41,712 and the current mileage was 49,505. Updated 07/26/10. *ljupdated 08/03/10

Car would not idle after starting. Thank god it happened in driveway. Towed to dealer, and dealer replaced iac valve,and cleaned fuel system.car had 37974 miles on it.purchased used on 07/03/03, was certifiedas used car, 33750 miles. Noticed intermittent turn signal flashing when purchased. Changed bulbs, no improvement. Shouldn't a safety recall be issued instead of a tsb on the idle problem?

Turning signal started toflashing really fast, took vehicle to dealer andcould not findcause.engineer repairedlights.consumer stated that seat belt warning light stopped working rightafter they fixedturn signal light.

Dt*: the contact stated there was a strong smell of gasoline fumes in the vehicle.a nhtsa recall letter, #06e056000, regarding fuel system, gasoline was received by the contact.the dealer was alerted and refused to perform the recall remedy.the dealership recommended that the manufacturer should be contacted.the vehicle was not included in the recall due to the vin. The consumer requested reimbursement for loss of gas. Updated09/05/06.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis.whenever the contact would attempt to slow down the vehicle, he noticed that it would suddenly shut off.the vehicle was taken to the dealer and they stated that the fuel pump needed to be replaced.the current and failure mileages were 23,000.updated 09/04/09.

For about a month, been having problems with 2001 mercury marquis.it would start, die, start die, etc.the problem became worst and i took it for service.was told that the fuel injectors were dirty and that the injector motor was not working correctly.that the fuel injector should have been cleaned at 30,000 miles.i said that it was not listed in my service manual.the service manager knew that but again stated that it should have been done at 30,000 miles. About 15 minues later anotehr mercury marquis came in with the same problem.the next day at work i learned that a friend was having the same problem with her mercury marquis.so did ford forget to list fuel injector cleaning in the service manual?dt

Car would not idle after starting. Thank god it happened in driveway. Towed to dealer, and dealer replaced iac valve,and cleaned fuel system.car had 37974 miles on it.purchased used on 07/03/03, was certifiedas used car, 33750 miles. Noticed intermittent turn signal flashing when purchased. Changed bulbs, no improvement. Shouldn't a safety recall be issued instead of a tsb on the idle problem?

A lot have happened still trying to figure out the problem it want crank now

While driving at night, my lights turned off by themselves on a dark rural road. If i hadn't jammed on the brakes, i would have eaten the railing or worse. Turns out the (lcm) lighting control module, is defective. When i looked it up online, it seems that many cars are having this issue, even my local police department. This is a big safety issue and needs to be addressed immediately. The dealer wanted to charge $578 plus 2 hours labor for a part that goes under the dash.

Mercury grand marquis 2001 with pedal adjuster raised in up position causes the car to have a burning brake smell. When the pedals are in a rasied position, and the car is driven for 30 to 60 minutes, the smell is that of burning brakes. Dealer has checked once and cannot find the problem.

2001 grand marquis,the adjustable pedalis not traveling more then one inch insread of three inches (nowseveral timesi was missing the brake pedal sincei am unable to lower it.

Odometer numbers do not line up and there are visible scratches on the lens of the odometer on the inside, the consumer states this is a result of possible odometer fraud.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that the vehicle would roll slightly when the gear was placed into park. The contact engaged the emergency brake prior to exiting the vehicle. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not notified. The approximate failure mileage was 168,914.

On incline vehicle will roll back fast whenstepping off the brakes. Also vehicle is difficult to shift into gears. Please provide further information.

When shifting vehicle into reverse it would go forward a few feet before going backwards. If shifting vehicle into neutral, it would go forward instead. Driver's foot was not on accelerator pedal.problem was intermittent. Taken vehicle to dealership.dealer performed tests with ford scan tool and there were no problems found/concern could not be duplicated.

Consumer was traveling about 29mph on a highwayand transmission acted like it wanted to downshift. Speed was withheld.mechanic toldconsumer thatcomputer for transmission needed to be replaced.

Transmission failure, causingstalling.

Vehicle suddenly accelerated when applyingbrakes to stop at approaching stop light, this occurred forsecond time.vehicle taken to dealer.onfirst occasiondealer was unable to locate cause.on second occasion dealer replacedtransmission. Feel free to provide any further information on this matter.

Right after it rained and the highway was wet i was doing about 30 mph and put the car in passing gear to pass another car, and the car went completely out of control.i lost all traction on the road and almost went into a ditch.the vehicle has no traction on wet pavements.

Consumer states there is a problem with the rear traction control, every time the pavement is wet he experiences problems and has almost been in 2 accidents because of this problem.

2001 grand marquis has no traction on wet pavements from dead stop. On all 2002 grand marquis they added as standard equiptment all-speed traction control.ford motor co. Knew about this problem for years.

When vehicle is driven on wet pavementrear wheels have no traction. Please give any further details.

Consumer states there is a problem with the rear traction control, every time the pavement is wet he experiences problems and has almost been in 2 accidents because of this problem.

Underside of car covered with oil.concrete driveway with many oil spots.pinon gear seal was leaking.replaced pinon seal.

While drivingat 40 mph, the vehicle shimmied in the front.the vehicle was taken to the dealership, where the mechanic re-balanced and aligned the tires.the problem still existed after being taken to an independent mechanic.this was an on going problem since the beginning of purchase.the consumer had an adjudication to take the vehicle back to the dealership.the vehicle had been back to the dealer on many occasions for the shimmy in the front.the dealership replaced all four tires and the driveshaft assembly.the vehicle developed an oil leak that was also ongoing, so the dealer replaced the oil pan/oil pan gasket and the rear main crank shaft seal.the ignition coil assembly had to be replaced as well.when the weather was cold, the hood would not pop open and the right front door did not close properly.*scc

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis.the contact stated that the passenger side seat belt buckle will not latch and stay locked.the contact went to the dealer and they stated that there was no recall on the seat belts; however, the insurance company stated otherwise.the failure mileage was 70,000.updated 03/23/09 *lj.updated 03/23/09.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis.the contact started the ignition and noticed that the driver's side front seat belt failed to latch.the failure occurred without warning.the authorized dealer was notified and the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for inspection.the technician discovered nhtsa campaign id number 01v227001 (seat belts; front buckle assembly); however, the vin was excluded from the recall.the vehicle has not been repaired.the vin was unknown.the failure and current mileages were 55,000.

Fatal accident in 2001 mercury grand marquis resulting from vehicle rollover. The highway patrol concluded that thedriver was not wearing seat belt.*mrthe driver was killed as a result of injuries sustained when he was ejected from his vehicle.after the accident deceased family learned of a seat belt buckle recall (01v227001).the deceased had taken the vehicle to have the recall repaired on nov 21 2002 and the dealer determined that the buckle did not need to be replaced.after the accident a ford tool test was performed and it was determined that the buckle had failed.

While driving the car the drivers and passengers seat belts release.i took it to a mechanic and they said the spring in the seat belt holder is failing.it isn't very unsettling to be driving the car and the seatbelt releases for no reason.it could be related to the 2000 seatbelt recall.we just bought the car for my college student. I don't want to wait for a death to get a recall.

Consistent problem with turn signal and air-conditioning malfunction. Fuse blows-no turn signal or air conditioning. Possible electrical problem and safety/fire hazard. Cerame dealership in st. Louis, mo has not been unable to locate the problem. Dealership service has replaced one wireand a sensor. Problem still exists. Taking vehicle back to dealership to resolve 6/23/03.

The driver's side seat belt disengages while driving, on its own, without any undue influence or strain.the previous owner informed me of the same problem that goes bacl to when they purchased the car in 2003(?).

The driver seat belt buckle on my 2001 mercury grand marquis unbuckles on its own. I buckle up, pull on it, and start out on the road. Next thing i know is the buckle comes apart and then its just a repeat of the same thing for the rest of the trip. Took the vehicle to cortese in rochester, ny and was told there was no recall on it. They buckled the belt but couldn't get it to fail in the shop. If i have an accident i will sue based on all the issues i am seeing on this site, and ford's unwilling to fix it.i bought the car a year and a half ago and it has been an off and on problem. I have 97,000 miles on it.

Driving down the highway, seat belt on, when all of a sudden the seat belt unlatches itself.this has happened over and over.in the meantime, i went on the internet to see if there had been any recalls of the grand marquis.sure enough, there is one on the seat belt.i called ford right away, went in and set up an appointment.ford claims there is no recall on my vehicle.it is a 2001, and i just recently bought it from a family member.just prior to all of this happening, i was hit while waiting at a red light in my smallhonda.ironically, if it wasn't for the fact that my son and i had on seat belts, we would have been seriously injured. Now, i'm depending on the grand marquis to get around.imagine how i feel knowing that there is a defective seat belt around me that isn't secure.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis ls. The contact stated that the front driver side seat belt buckle failed to latch securely. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer and they informed that the buckle assembly would need to be replaced. There was a recall associated with nhtsa campaign id number 01v227001 (seat belts front: buckle assembly); however, the vin was not included in the recall. The technician ordered the part, and informed that when the part became available the vehicle would be repaired. The failure mileage was 98,000.updated 03/07/11*ljupdated 03/14/11

1 passenger seat belt not functioning properly2 speed control not working3 passenger side headlight not working in low beam only high beam

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that the vehicle was inspected for a possible recall by the previous owner for a seat belt and passed the inspection. The contact reported that the seat belts were unlatching while he was driving. The contact called autonation lincoln clearwater (2085 gulf to bay blvd, clearwater, fl 33765, (727) 231-1380) and left a message for them to call him back. The contact did not receive a response from the dealer. The contact called the manufacturer who stated that the seat belts were inspected by the previous owner and was no longer their issue. The failure mileage was unknown.

Tthe driver's seat belt releases. It clicks into place but let's go after vehicle is in motion.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that the driver side seat belt would not latch. The vehicle was taken to a dealer who diagnosed that the latch needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 215,000.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis.the contact stated that while driving the seat belt disengaged from the buckle.the owner stated that the seat belts have been checked and was told that there was no failure found.ford stated that the seat belt repair would cost $270 at the owners expense. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and current mileage was approximately 55,000.the vin was unknown.

Several times each time i drive the drivers seat belt will come undone

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis ls. The contact stated that the front driver side seat belt buckle failed to latch securely. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer and they informed that the buckle assembly would need to be replaced. There was a recall associated with nhtsa campaign id number 01v227001 (seat belts front: buckle assembly); however, the vin was not included in the recall. The technician ordered the part, and informed that when the part became available the vehicle would be repaired. The failure mileage was 98,000.updated 03/07/11*ljupdated 03/14/11

Consumer was involved in a frontal accident.the driver side air bad did not deploy but the passenger side air bag inflated.the right air bag was replaced.the seat belt left bad bruises across the chest of consumer.going 30 to 35 mph, consumer was thrown into the steering wheel.a new seat belt was installed on the drivers side and is operating normally. *jg

Front seat belt restraint buckle assembly failed to properly latch making the seat belt and warning assembly inoperative. Ford refused to honor recall.

Tl-the contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis.the driver's side seatbelt releases on it's own.the current and failure mileage was 88,000.the dealer name was the only dealer info avail.lm

Attorney represented the family of wallace petro who had died in an automobile accident whiledriving a 2001 grand marquisthe attorney alleged that the driver's side seat belt buckle failed, and caused mr. Petro to be ejected during the roll over incident.the vehicle was previously serviced under recall 01v227000. Informationas told to odi.*tc

Consumer contacted dealership forrecall repair 01v227000 concerning seatbelts. But, has been unable to havesea tbelts repaireddue to lack of parts. Please provide further details.

Recall number 01v227001 concerning seat belt buckles.dealer has no parts available to correct recall problem. Consumer was told thatparts would become available within 2-5 bussiness days.consumer could not leave vehicle without rental car assistance. Before dealer released vehicle, consumer had to sign a form releasing dealer andmanufacturer of any further obligations.

Turning signal started toflashing really fast, took vehicle to dealer andcould not findcause.engineer repairedlights.consumer stated that seat belt warning light stopped working rightafter they fixedturn signal light.

Failure of power seat recliner to keep the driver seat back in an upright position.

My father in law was driving my vehicle when a gmc yukon pulled out in front of him. My father in law hit the side of the yukon and only one air bag deployed which was the passanger side,my father in law was taken to the hospital bc of no feeling below his waist and the paramedics were unable to stabilize his blood pressure.

Rear brakes lock up during a panic stop at 45-50 mph, tires were thumping and vehicle pulls to either side. Dealer examined vehicle and found no problem. Ts *dt

Consumer stated there was a rattling noise coming from the engine when cold, dealer informed consumer the timing gear needed to be replaced,also the dashboard vibrated, however dealer stated nothing was wrong, the trim panel was loose on the door, the left front door closed too hard, the vehicle would lean to the left and there was a noise coming from the front of the vehicle when turninga corner,dealer replaced the front frame supports, the instrument cluster was scratched, the steering column trim was replaced, the radio had a poor reception, there was a pulsation coming from the brakes, however the dealer could not duplicate the problem. Ph

Sporadically when brake pedal is depressedvehicle jerks forward and stalls.

Dt*:the contact stated that the front end of the vehicle made a consistent, loud squeaking noise.the vehicle was taken to a service dealer, where the hood was lubricated and adjusted.the repair was not successful in fixing the problem.also, when the brakes were depressed, the vehicle lurched forward.the service dealer was unable to determine the cause of the brake problem.updated 9/20/2006 -the vehicle's brake booster and front suspension also made noise.

Vehicle suddenly accelerated when applyingbrakes to stop at approaching stop light, this occurred forsecond time.vehicle taken to dealer.onfirst occasiondealer was unable to locate cause.on second occasion dealer replacedtransmission. Feel free to provide any further information on this matter.

On incline vehicle will roll back fast whenstepping off the brakes. Also vehicle is difficult to shift into gears. Please provide further information.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis.while driving 30 mph, the brakes made a squealing sound and locked when the pedal was depressed.the failure caused the contact to rear end the preceding vehicle.the air bags failed to deploy.there were no injuries.a police report was filed.the vehicle has not been diagnosed by the dealer.the current and failure mileages were 50,000.

When applying brakes they feel soft. Brake pedalkeeps going all the way to floor.has had them worked on three times,and theystill not functioning correctly.

Consumer was involved in a collision while driving 35mph, the passenger air bag deployed, however the driver air bag did not, consumer was injured and had to miss 47 days of work, ford sen consumer a refusal of liability stating that there was not enough impact force to trigger air bag deployment, this vehicle only had 190 miles at time of incident, however consumer no longer feels safe with it, dealer replaced the control module, no representatives ever came from ford to inspect vehicle, two recalls, 00v27 and 00v412, deal with air bag problems.

When applying brakes to come to a stop, pedal goes to the floor. This also happens during emergency braking. Dealer stated this was the way the vehicle was designed.

Vehicle has accelerated 3 times when consumer wanted to slow down. Applied brakes, but was not able to slow down. Finally, had to take vehicle out of gear to slow down. Dealer cannot findcause.

Adjustable brake pedal is way too close togas pedal when brake pedal is all the way down. Contacted dealer,and the dealerwasnot willing to do anything.

Brake pedal and acelerator pedal are to close together and on the same plane.twice ,the car developed a run away condition when i applied the brakes,i was pushing on the brakes and hitting the acelerator at the same time.the rear tires were burning rubber.had to put the car in neutral to stop the car.brought this problem to the attention of the dealer to no avail. Just don`t trust this vehicle any more.nlm

When the incident occurred my vehicle was moving, i was taking a right hand turn decreasing my speed from 35 miles an hour to take a proper right hand turn. Midway through my turn my steering locked up and i almost hit the island that was at the intersection. My two step children of 7 years old and 4 years old we're in the car at the time. There was a safety recall on over 330,000 ford's and mercury's for a binding steering shaft issue which i believe is the issue with my car. This is a low mileage vehicle and i do not believe that this problem should have occurred

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that there was an extremely loud abnormal noise coming from the steering wheel. The contact stated that the noise was heard upon turning the steering wheel, which was loose. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for inspection and diagnostic testing. The vehicle was to be taken to a dealer for further diagnostic testing. The vin was not included in nhtsa campaign number: 15e082000 (steering). The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was not available.

Headlight problem going on and off.and the steering seems off. I need your help fixing this problem.this isn't good.i love mercury ford.but i've tried contacting them and no response yet.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that the steering shaft was damaged. When turning, the vehicle traveled in the opposite direction of where the contact steered. The vehicle also failed to drive in a straight line and swayed from one side of the road to the other. Also, the check oil indicator illuminated. The vehicle was taken to fairway ford(366 w main st, canfield, oh 44406, (330) 533-3673), but no assistance was provided. The vehicle was diagnosed, but not repaired because the vehicle was out of warranty. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact planned to call the manufacturer. The failure mileage was 80,000.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. While driving approximately 25 mph, the steering wheel intermittently seized. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who stated that the lower intermediate steering shaft would need to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact mentioned nhtsa campaign number: 14v704000 (steering) related to the 2005-2011 model year vehicles. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 72,000. Updated 09/25/15*ljthe consumer fixed the vehicle at his expense. Updated 10/01/15

I believe there is a manufacturing issue with many of the ford mercury grand marquis from multiple years of models. It took only minimal effort to find that many people have the same issue as i do with cars of the same make and model regarding the front wheel assemblybeing hazardous and ultimately unsafe to drive the vehicle. My personal issue is a very noticeable clanking/thudding coming from mostly the driver side front tire and the assembly used to control and secure the tire. Many similar complaints appeared as results on google after attempting to search solutions and answers to what the problem is. I found more than one account of people losing front tires while driving and even coming to a stop to park. I believe there is a massive safety concern here with so many identical accounts on the same issue. I for one rely on my personal vehicle greatly and truly think the company should be forced to come up with a legitimate solution to this issue. Live are at risk here and i for one think this needs to be taken into serious consideration. I continued to search for a solution but could not find any viable considerations on the internet. All accounts lead to the front drive assembly being simply defective and can not be prevented or permanently repaired in most cases. The company must be held responsible. They should be in charge of redesigning and replacing the front steering assembly on all cars still affected by this issue and made liable for all expenses of replacement.

The steering wheel locked and the vehicle did not start.the dealer stated there was no problem.

Consumer stated there was a rattling noise coming from the engine when cold, dealer informed consumer the timing gear needed to be replaced,also the dashboard vibrated, however dealer stated nothing was wrong, the trim panel was loose on the door, the left front door closed too hard, the vehicle would lean to the left and there was a noise coming from the front of the vehicle when turninga corner,dealer replaced the front frame supports, the instrument cluster was scratched, the steering column trim was replaced, the radio had a poor reception, there was a pulsation coming from the brakes, however the dealer could not duplicate the problem. Ph

Vehicle develops major vibration in steering wheel at 65+mph going over lightly bumpy and heavily bumpy roads.........feels like losing control of vehicle......problem duplicated during test drive by senior maint mgr at dealership.......existing tsb on this issue.....service writer at dealer claims other than balancing wheels.....ford has not come up with solution...they are working on it.....vehicle no longer drivable on freeways or at highway speed

Accelerating from a stop in low gear at 15 mph, felt a slight vibration followed by a deafing loud/bang explosion. Dealer not able to diagnose.

Dt*:the contact stated that the front end of the vehicle made a consistent, loud squeaking noise.the vehicle was taken to a service dealer, where the hood was lubricated and adjusted.the repair was not successful in fixing the problem.also, when the brakes were depressed, the vehicle lurched forward.the service dealer was unable to determine the cause of the brake problem.updated 9/20/2006 -the vehicle's brake booster and front suspension also made noise.

While drivingat 40 mph, the vehicle shimmied in the front.the vehicle was taken to the dealership, where the mechanic re-balanced and aligned the tires.the problem still existed after being taken to an independent mechanic.this was an on going problem since the beginning of purchase.the consumer had an adjudication to take the vehicle back to the dealership.the vehicle had been back to the dealer on many occasions for the shimmy in the front.the dealership replaced all four tires and the driveshaft assembly.the vehicle developed an oil leak that was also ongoing, so the dealer replaced the oil pan/oil pan gasket and the rear main crank shaft seal.the ignition coil assembly had to be replaced as well.when the weather was cold, the hood would not pop open and the right front door did not close properly.*scc

Problems with vehicle vibration while driving.*mr the consumer took the vehicle to the shop several times and the problem had not been fixed. The consumer had a warranty. The dealer was aware of the problem, there was just no way to fix it.the vehicle vibrated while in gear, waiting at a stop light or stop sign.

2001 mercury grand marquis trunk caught on fire in the morning.wasn't used that morning.cause of fire unknown.

Vehicle proceeding north on city street.collided with side of vehicle #2west bound at intersection.driver's side airbag failed to deploy.passenger side deployed.

Takata recall...my paint is chipping all over the place whatever the company painted my car with was bad...

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that there was water in the vehicle from the rear passenger side floorboard. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 76,000.

Consumer stated there was a rattling noise coming from the engine when cold, dealer informed consumer the timing gear needed to be replaced,also the dashboard vibrated, however dealer stated nothing was wrong, the trim panel was loose on the door, the left front door closed too hard, the vehicle would lean to the left and there was a noise coming from the front of the vehicle when turninga corner,dealer replaced the front frame supports, the instrument cluster was scratched, the steering column trim was replaced, the radio had a poor reception, there was a pulsation coming from the brakes, however the dealer could not duplicate the problem. Ph

Dt: the contact stated that the right passenger door on2001 mercury marquis will not stay open long enough to get in and out of the car, it floppedback andforward.she had it at dealerfor service in 5-04, and they adjusted it. On 9-18-05 the door came back,and hit the contactin the shoulder. Her shoulder was black and blue, and she could hardly move her arm up and down for three days.on 9-25-05 the dealer told her that it was the design of the car, and there was nothing they could do about it. Also, she talked to the manufacturer , and they told her the same thing.

The trunk of the vehicle was full of water due to a faulty seal, the vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was replaced but the leak has reoccured.

While drivingat 40 mph, the vehicle shimmied in the front.the vehicle was taken to the dealership, where the mechanic re-balanced and aligned the tires.the problem still existed after being taken to an independent mechanic.this was an on going problem since the beginning of purchase.the consumer had an adjudication to take the vehicle back to the dealership.the vehicle had been back to the dealer on many occasions for the shimmy in the front.the dealership replaced all four tires and the driveshaft assembly.the vehicle developed an oil leak that was also ongoing, so the dealer replaced the oil pan/oil pan gasket and the rear main crank shaft seal.the ignition coil assembly had to be replaced as well.when the weather was cold, the hood would not pop open and the right front door did not close properly.*scc

While driving, the sway bar broke which caused the rear end to lock up.

Consumer stated there was a rattling noise coming from the engine when cold, dealer informed consumer the timing gear needed to be replaced,also the dashboard vibrated, however dealer stated nothing was wrong, the trim panel was loose on the door, the left front door closed too hard, the vehicle would lean to the left and there was a noise coming from the front of the vehicle when turninga corner,dealer replaced the front frame supports, the instrument cluster was scratched, the steering column trim was replaced, the radio had a poor reception, there was a pulsation coming from the brakes, however the dealer could not duplicate the problem. Ph

Dt*:the contact stated that the front end of the vehicle made a consistent, loud squeaking noise.the vehicle was taken to a service dealer, where the hood was lubricated and adjusted.the repair was not successful in fixing the problem.also, when the brakes were depressed, the vehicle lurched forward.the service dealer was unable to determine the cause of the brake problem.updated 9/20/2006 -the vehicle's brake booster and front suspension also made noise.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis.while driving between 45-50 mph, the contact noticed a low pitch humming noise coming from the rear wheel.she took the vehicle to the dealer and they stated that the cause of the failure was premature axle wear.they also stated that they would repair all rear axles and bearings at the cost of $1,350.the manufacturer has not been notified.the current and failure mileages were approximately 44,000.

Discovered problem when car was on a lift, for cosmetic work.we don't know when bolt fell out.the rear end was jumping sideways around turns since we owned the car, we didn't know it wasn't normal..we put 1000 miles on the car in the past week that we owned the car.

While driving any speed or when making a turn, consumer could feel tires not attaching to road and making vehicle slip, consumer lost control of vehicle, consumer had contacted dealer for tire situation, but they could not fix problem. Mercury, grand marquis, 2001.. Consumer also stated that the rear suspension feels soft.(michelin radial f 123ap)

Vehicle has no traction on wet pavements, consumer states that this has almost caused 2 accidents.*jg

While driving any speed or when making a turn, consumer could feel tires not attaching to road and making vehicle slip, consumer lost control of vehicle, consumer had contacted dealer for tire situation, but they could not fix problem. Mercury, grand marquis, 2001.. Consumer also stated that the rear suspension feels soft.(michelin radial f 123ap)

Vehicle has no traction on wet pavements, consumer states that this has almost caused 2 accidents.*jg

Thread separated and blew off left front tire. Upon examination by goodyear tire dealers and myself it was determined that the right front tire had separated to the point of thread blow off imminent.the two rear tires were determined to be in the middle stages of thread seperation as thread had bubbles of seperation beggining to show and would fail at unknown time, but would fail.

Consumer stated there was a rattling noise coming from the engine when cold, dealer informed consumer the timing gear needed to be replaced,also the dashboard vibrated, however dealer stated nothing was wrong, the trim panel was loose on the door, the left front door closed too hard, the vehicle would lean to the left and there was a noise coming from the front of the vehicle when turninga corner,dealer replaced the front frame supports, the instrument cluster was scratched, the steering column trim was replaced, the radio had a poor reception, there was a pulsation coming from the brakes, however the dealer could not duplicate the problem. Ph

Consistent problem with turn signal and air-conditioning malfunction. Fuse blows-no turn signal or air conditioning. Possible electrical problem and safety/fire hazard. Cerame dealership in st. Louis, mo has not been unable to locate the problem. Dealership service has replaced one wireand a sensor. Problem still exists. Taking vehicle back to dealership to resolve 6/23/03.

I believe there is a manufacturing issue with many of the ford mercury grand marquis from multiple years of models. It took only minimal effort to find that many people have the same issue as i do with cars of the same make and model regarding the front wheel assemblybeing hazardous and ultimately unsafe to drive the vehicle. My personal issue is a very noticeable clanking/thudding coming from mostly the driver side front tire and the assembly used to control and secure the tire. Many similar complaints appeared as results on google after attempting to search solutions and answers to what the problem is. I found more than one account of people losing front tires while driving and even coming to a stop to park. I believe there is a massive safety concern here with so many identical accounts on the same issue. I for one rely on my personal vehicle greatly and truly think the company should be forced to come up with a legitimate solution to this issue. Live are at risk here and i for one think this needs to be taken into serious consideration. I continued to search for a solution but could not find any viable considerations on the internet. All accounts lead to the front drive assembly being simply defective and can not be prevented or permanently repaired in most cases. The company must be held responsible. They should be in charge of redesigning and replacing the front steering assembly on all cars still affected by this issue and made liable for all expenses of replacement.

Sudden acceleration. Incident occurred in my home driveway. Car lurched forward into my house, damaging the right side of my car and left side of the garage.

Car would start and die.failed to run at idle.replaced idle air sensor.event occurred at 55,000 miles.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that while driving at 65 mph, the vehicle accelerated rapidly without warning. The contact tried to depress the brake pedal and disengaged the cruise control but neither attempts to slow the vehicle were successful. The contact was able to slow the vehicle down only by depressing the accelerator pedal again after a period of unintended acceleration. The dealer was not contacted about the failure. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue and referred the contact to the dealer. The failure mileage was 88,000.updated 10/24/17*lj

Vehicle experienced sudden acceleration while slowing down for a red light, the speed control has been disconnected.nlm

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated while driving 70 mph, the accelerator pedal failed to return to the original position after being depressed. The contact had to lift the accelerator pedal with his foot in order to get the vehicle to slow down. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was not taken to a dealer or independent mechanic for diagnosis or repairs. The manufacturer had not been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 50,000. The vin was unavailable.*dt

Vehicle suddenly accelerated when applyingbrakes to stop at approaching stop light, this occurred forsecond time.vehicle taken to dealer.onfirst occasiondealer was unable to locate cause.on second occasion dealer replacedtransmission. Feel free to provide any further information on this matter.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 70 mph, the vehicle was jerking and the abs and the check engine warning lights illuminated. The vehicle had a drastic reduction in speed. The vehicle was restarted. The vehicle was taken to the dealer on several occasions where it was repaired but the repair details were unknown. The repairs failed to remedy the vehicle. The contact statedthe service engine warning light continued to illuminated and the vehicle jerked violently, reduced speed and attempted to stall. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 136,037.updated 12/03/15*lj

Criuse control fails to disengage while driving at highway speed of 65 mph, causing accident and total loss of vehicle. *jg

When shifting from park to reverse the power train will lock up or go into a severe strain similar to brakes being locked.occassionally the car will surge forward even though the trans indicator is in the reverse position.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. While the vehicle was stopped, the vehicle accelerated without warning. The contact was able to pull over to the side of the road. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed, but the technician could not determine the cause of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 218,000. The vin was not available.

Consumer stated the vehicle experienced sudden acceleration on numerous occasions.the acceleration stopped by itself on attempts to stop the acceleration.when on cruise going up a hill, the vehicle would accelerate rapidly when holding the accelerator up.*scc

While driving at 10 mph engine started to race really loud, consumer turned key off, and hit brakes immediately and stopped.consumer towed vehicle to dealer, and currently it has worked. The motor started racing following a loud noise, and went out of control. The problem appears to be a factry defect.

Car would not idle after starting. Thank god it happened in driveway. Towed to dealer, and dealer replaced iac valve,and cleaned fuel system.car had 37974 miles on it.purchased used on 07/03/03, was certifiedas used car, 33750 miles. Noticed intermittent turn signal flashing when purchased. Changed bulbs, no improvement. Shouldn't a safety recall be issued instead of a tsb on the idle problem?

2001 mercury grand marquis.. Sudden engine acceleration. While stopped at a traffic light, the engine accelerated at a rapid rate and had to be placed in neutral in order to return to normal idle.fortunately driver had his foot on the brake.

I was turning into my drive way and the car all of a certain accelerated to a speed up andi immediately jump on to the brake to stop the car and it crashed into the back fence . I got out the car to check and see if the pedal had the floor mat on it and their was nothing on it.

Vehicle has accelerated 3 times when consumer wanted to slow down. Applied brakes, but was not able to slow down. Finally, had to take vehicle out of gear to slow down. Dealer cannot findcause.

When vehicle is idling at stop sign, at a red light, in gear with foot on brakes, vehicle will start accelerating.consumer has to slam on brakes to keep vehicle from jumping forward. Also, has to turn key off. But, this problem only happens intermittently.

Consumer stated while backing out at 5 mph, vehicle suddenly accelerated, consumer was not able to stop vehicle, after about 100 ft vehicle hit a building, the vehicle was totalled, no injuries.

The contact owns a 2001 mercury grand marquis. The contact stated that the vehicle accelerated without warning. The dealer was unable to diagnose the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 50,000.

1 passenger seat belt not functioning properly2 speed control not working3 passenger side headlight not working in low beam only high beam

Vehicle would suddenly accelerate while idling at a stop light/sign. Had no warning. Would need to press hard onbrakes andshift/ turn vehicle off. Had been to dealerand mechanic who placed vehicle on diagnostic machine. Nothing was found, even after being test driven.

Cruise control moves gas pedal rapidly down and back up at a rate of 1 to 2 occilations per second, at times car can be felt to jerk back and forth. Dealer has made many attempts to correct the issue under warrenty but now is being told that ford will no longer pay for repairs. I feel this may be a safety issue as i do not know when the car may accelerate out of controll.

While backing out of a parking lot the vehicle suddenly accelerated without prior warning.causing damage to the vehicle. The dealership is aware of the problem. Mr

Sudden acceleration.

Tl - the vehicle was a 2001 mercury grand marquis.while driving the gas pedal became stuck.the vehicle then side swiped twoother vehicles.the vehiclewent off the road and hit a tree.the passenger side front was damaged. The air bags did not deploy.the failure mileagewas 25,000.thepassenger and driver sustained injuries.the vehicle was towed.pictureswere taken ,and a police report was filed.

While driving vehicle and upon backing out of driveway consumers foot slipped off gas pedal, could not find brake pedal to stop vehicle. Consumer hit a parked vehicle. Consumers foot became engaged with the ledge of the gas pedal as he was attempting to put on brakes while backing out of the driveway. *jg

While applying brakes vehicle accelerated . Asa result, the vehicle collided into a cement wall at 80 mph. Air bags deployed.occupants wer both taken to intensive care unit.

While driving in sleet and snowdefroster does not work properly.defroster can be on, but doesn'tclear windows.please add vin.

When driving with rear windows down, and initiating the controls to return the rear windows to their "closed" position, upon the rear windows reaching the top closed position, the driver side front window opens partially or may open fully on it's own.also when attempting to roll all windows up at the same time, the circuitry becomes overloaded and all windows stop and will not move for about 3 to 5 minutes until the circuit timer resets. *nlm

While driving insleet and snow storm windshield wipers froze and stopped working.windshield wiper bladeswerer very thin.cause unknown.please add vin.

Intermittentlywindshield wipers become inoperable, obstructingdriver's view.also,srs light stays illuminated while the vehicle is in motion. Dealer has not been able to duplicate the problem.

When drivingwheel disc will cut into tire valve and cause it to have a slow leak. Ifvalve is touchedair will escape.please provide more information.

I believe there is a manufacturing issue with many of the ford mercury grand marquis from multiple years of models. It took only minimal effort to find that many people have the same issue as i do with cars of the same make and model regarding the front wheel assemblybeing hazardous and ultimately unsafe to drive the vehicle. My personal issue is a very noticeable clanking/thudding coming from mostly the driver side front tire and the assembly used to control and secure the tire. Many similar complaints appeared as results on google after attempting to search solutions and answers to what the problem is. I found more than one account of people losing front tires while driving and even coming to a stop to park. I believe there is a massive safety concern here with so many identical accounts on the same issue. I for one rely on my personal vehicle greatly and truly think the company should be forced to come up with a legitimate solution to this issue. Live are at risk here and i for one think this needs to be taken into serious consideration. I continued to search for a solution but could not find any viable considerations on the internet. All accounts lead to the front drive assembly being simply defective and can not be prevented or permanently repaired in most cases. The company must be held responsible. They should be in charge of redesigning and replacing the front steering assembly on all cars still affected by this issue and made liable for all expenses of replacement.




Read more




© 2024 All rights reserved