Enter VIN number
Get the most accurate report for the vehicle. Basic information is FREE
Use this form now and GET 20% DISCOUNT for CarVertical reports!




We found the following complaints for KEYSTONE SPRINTER (2004)

Read complaints for KEYSTONE SPRINTER (2004)


The contact owns a 2004 keystone sprinter fifth wheel. The contact stated that the vehicle was equipped with a ladder that was mounted on the rear by the manufacturer. The screws that were used to mount the later ended up penetrating an electrical wire. The contact noticed the problem when he touched the ladder and felt a slight shock. After further review, the contact found out that the ladder had not been grounded per electrical code. The vehicle was taken to the manufacturer and was repaired. The contact suggested that the manufacturer should pay for the repair and was offered half of the repair cost. The failure and current mileages were 5,000.

My 2004 keystone sprinter 293 fifth wheel caught fire while parked in my driveway.the charlotte, nc fire investigator suspects it started at the refrigerator.my refrigerator is part of the dometic recall.my insurance company is in the process of investigating if the refrigerator design was the cause.these refrigerator are dangerous and dometic needs to take responsibility for the losses that occur.keystone needs to be held responsible as well because they are not ensuring their suppliers are providing safe components.

Domestic company regarding refrigerator recall. 2004 sprinter travel trailer was purchased new.*dtthe consumer stated he never received a recall notice in the mail. The consumer was only been able to find one dealer who made service calls to homes, but they charged $240.00. The consumer stated he should not have to pay that amount money since he did not cause the problem. Dometic stated they would only cover $60.00 or the consumer would have to find a cheaper dealer.

The contact owns a 2004 keystone sprinter fifth wheel. The contact stated that the vehicle was equipped with a ladder that was mounted on the rear by the manufacturer. The screws that were used to mount the later ended up penetrating an electrical wire. The contact noticed the problem when he touched the ladder and felt a slight shock. After further review, the contact found out that the ladder had not been grounded per electrical code. The vehicle was taken to the manufacturer and was repaired. The contact suggested that the manufacturer should pay for the repair and was offered half of the repair cost. The failure and current mileages were 5,000.

The weakest linki own a 2004 keystone sprinter.this rv unit has 30,000 towed miles.this rv has the double eye suspension system.during my travels in 2007 a set of shackle plates broke.this part failure has resulted in a $1500.00 loss including a bent axle, suspension parts and damaged tires.yes, i am out of warranty.keystone sprinter provided an $800.00 compensation.this suspension failure could cause fatal bodily damage.when a shackle plate breaks the axle can become detached from the rv home frame.the keystone sprinter organization refers to the failed part as a 'wear part'. This issue than belongs to the rv home owner.keystone sprinter and al-ko kober, suspension manufacture, owner's manual states only 'inspect the suspension every 6000 miles'.a visual inspection of the shackle plate area of the suspension system can not detect any problems with the shackle plate.one of the failure features is the elongation of the mounting hole in the shackle plate.www.cerka.cais a web site that address suspension system maintenance clearly reads 'if the shackle mount holes are elongated that part needs to be replaced'.i feel that it would be a responsible action to require rv manufactures to notify their customers of potential suspension problems with emphasis on the shackle plate part.the 'buyer beware' should be further clarified.1-rv manufactures should clearly point out in owners manual that the shackle plates when found to have elongated mounting holes should be replaced.2-service organizations should be required to bring focus to owners that suspensions systems should be inspected.then let the customer sign off that 'inspection service on the suspension system' was recommended and declined'the suspension system issues could be addressed similar to the 2007 keystone provided informational dvd about procedures for tightening wheel lug nuts so that tires would not fall off the rv coach.

My 5th wheel camper model 252 fwrls has a gvwr 8200 and the tires (st205/75r15c) have a 1820 rating @ 50 psi (max) with two axles equaling a total of 4 tires the max load is 7280.therefore, the camper is overloaded 920 lbs based on the tire/wheel maximum load capacity.isn't this illegal.i always thought the tires looked overloaded or low but they were at max pressure.




Read more




© 2024 All rights reserved