Enter VIN number
Get the most accurate report for the vehicle. Basic information is FREE
Use this form now and GET 20% DISCOUNT for CarVertical reports!




We found the following complaints for GMC YUKON XL 2500 (2001)

Read complaints for GMC YUKON XL 2500 (2001)


Was driving down a stretch of straight road in warrenton, virginia when i went to press the button that changes the display near the odometer from "odometer," "trip 1" miles, and "trip 2" miles. When i reached my hand bumped the ignition switch and everything in the vehicle shut off including the engine, power steering, and brakes. I had no control of the vehicle and it rolled to complete stop down the road we were driving on. Once it came to a complete stop, i restarted the vehicle and everything seemed alright so continued driving, had it looked at, and was told everything was fine. I believe that the ignition switch issues affect the 2001 yukon xl 2500 and that it should be looked into further.

My 2001 xl 2500 has had periodic problems starting and stalling at different times.the starting problem happens about 2 times as often as the stalling problem.they do not happen at the same time.usually, if it doesn't fire right up you have to wait about twenty seconds and try again.it usually starts the second or third time.the stalling problem is less detectable.it has happened about 4 times total.each time i was fortunate to be going under 30 miles per hour and able to compensate for the loss of power.i did not purchase this vehicle as new and do not know if prior owner experienced any problems.it had 30,000 miles on it wheni purchased it in jan. 2002.

While traveling at highway speeds the engine stopped working / stalled.shifting to neutral and trying to start the vehicle was not successful.the vehicle without the assistance of power steering or power brakes had to be carefully stopped .this was extremely dangerous!after looking at an on-line forum, the vehicle with the 8.1 liter engin had some vehicles recalled with a cam lobe sensor fault which causes this to happen.after contacting the dealer, they told me that my vehicle was not in this recall.however, when the vehicle was new, they had already replace the same part when the vehicle was 3-5 months old.i questioned them as to the replacement part as the first part only caused the check engine light, not completely disabling the engine.it may be they replace the factory original part with a part which was defective and covered by the recall.in eather case, a engine on heavy duty vehicle which quits and disables the normal brakes and steering is extremely dangerous.

Dt*: the contact stated the vehicle stalled without warning at speeds between 10-20 mph.the vehicle restarted each time.the vehicle had not been inspected by the dealership.

My 2001 xl 2500 has had periodic problems starting and stalling at different times.the starting problem happens about 2 times as often as the stalling problem.they do not happen at the same time.usually, if it doesn't fire right up you have to wait about twenty seconds and try again.it usually starts the second or third time.the stalling problem is less detectable.it has happened about 4 times total.each time i was fortunate to be going under 30 miles per hour and able to compensate for the loss of power.i did not purchase this vehicle as new and do not know if prior owner experienced any problems.it had 30,000 miles on it wheni purchased it in jan. 2002.

The contact owns a 2001 gmc yukon xl 2500. The crank case position sensor shuts on and off intermittently which caused the engine to stall and it may not restart immediately. The failure is related to nhtsa#07v521000 and gm recall# 06083, engine and engine cooling. The dealer advised the contact that there were no recalls. A different authorized dealer performed a diagnostic test and stated that thecrank shaft position sensor needed to be replaced. The dealer also stated that the repair cost was $800 and if the failure affected the transmission additional fees would be included. A local mechanic repaired the transmission at for less than $800. The dealer and the manufacturer advised the contact that there were no related recalls for her vin. The failure mileage was 67,315 and the current mileage was 80,000.

Engine stalls while driving.intermittently.and engine won't re-start without numerous tries.the problem is getting worse and worse.stalling 3 or times a day, without warning.

The contact owns a 2001 gmc yukon xl 2500.while driving 35 mph, the vehicle suddenly stalled and lost power steering.the contact attempted to restart the vehicle, but it took a few minutes.he drove the vehicle to the dealer and they replaced the crankshaft position sensor and there had been no further occurrences.after the repair, he discovered the recall for the same defect for the yukon, but not for the yukon xl, even though it had the same motor.he called the manufacturer and they stated that the vin was not included in the recall, although the contact feels that it should be included.the recall number was unknown.the failure mileage was 82,000.

Gmc yukon xl 2500, 8.1l engine... Purchased truck (2nd owner) 8/2005 from gmc dealer.noticed first occasion of stalling app. 10/05 or 11/05.dealer said "couldn't reproduce complaint" and released the vehicle.truck drove ok for awhile and began stalling again, this time gm dealer said "fuel pump" ($900+).truck continued to stall on and off for years, each time no one could find problem..recently, summer of 09, it has become worse (more frequent and longer time to re-start) and after two independent diagnostic tests by two separate certified mechanics, it was determined to be the crank positioning sensor.i had already heard about this problem but since my vin wasn't included in the recall (even though its the same year, model and engine) i am being told that the dealership will not cover!!!i don't know what else to do.. I cant drive this vehicle any longer because it stalls much more often and without any warning meaning loss of power steering, etc and risk of crash.i have called gm as recent as today (12/09) and they are still singing the same tune.."your vehicle vin# isn't included in the recall".next stop media outlets!!

Dt*: the contact stated while driving 70 mph on normal road conditions, the vehicle stalled. The vehicle would not restart, however the electrical system worked properly. The vehicle was towed to a dealer who determined the fuse of the fuel pump had gone out.the fuse was replaced.a few weeks later while driving 70 mph, the vehicle stalled again.this time the vehicle was towed to a different dealer who determined the fuel pump wiring shorted and the vehicle needed a new fuel pump. There was a recall #01v159000 regarding the fuel pump. The vehicle was not included in the recall due to the vin.when the manufacturer was contacted, a complaint was taken which resulted in a partial reimbursement for the repairs.

Was driving vehicle, stopped vehicle, noticed that gas was leaking from underneath the vehicle. Took car to dealership to diagnose issue. Quoted $970 to fix. Fuel nipple broke on fuel pump assembly. Entire assembly had to be replaced. Gm recalled 316,058 vehicles for this issue. My vehicle was not part of the recall based on the vin number. Gmc will not compensate even though other yukon xl's and chevy suburban'shave had this problem. I have a friend who owns a 2001 chevy suburban and he had the same thing happen to his vehicle. He had to have the same part replaced on his vehicle. This problem is a safety issue. Looked at the fuel pump assembly that was defective and the fact that one of the 3 plastic nipples broke, i feel that this should be a recall. This part is defective. Now gmc has a lifetime guarantee on the replacement fuel pump assembly. This tells m that they are aware that the original ones were faulty parts. So in other words we've got good news and bad news...we will guarantee the part for lifetime but it will cost you $970 for a part that i should not have had to replace. This was not due to wear and tear. They have plastic nipples on the top of the fuel pump assembly line. Gas eats plastic.

Accelerated rigid brake line corrosion resulted in brake line failure and complete loss of vehicle stopping ability. Brake lines are inspected regularly and did not appear rusted.vehicle was in motion traveling at approximately 20 mph when operator stepped on brake to slow and stop vehicle. Brake pedal felt soft and then pressed completely to floor without any braking action. Operator used emergency brake to slow and stop vehicle. Vehicle required immediate towing as it was not road worthy and was unsafe to drive without braking ability.

While traveling on the expressway, brakes were applied to exit the expressway and the pedal went to the floor. Found ruptured line on rear axle.date of first incident 2/5 20011most recent 4/26/2015...ruptured line undervehicle ( drivers seat location) all lines require replacement.

While on a hill holding the vehicle with the brakes activated, a large amount of white smoke came billowing out of the engine compartment.i was able to determine that the fluid was clear and dripping on the hot exhaust manifold.the brake reservoir dropped with successive brake applications.after having the vehicle towed to a repair facility, it was determined that multiple fixed metal brake lines were corrodingand one had enough to corrosion to cause a failure of the metal causing a leaking break line.all fixed metal brake lies were replace at a very high expense due to the labor to install the new lines. Part were only a fraction of the labor to install new brake lines along the body framing.ironically, the repair shop owner had a 2500 series gm pickup truck which experience the same brake line failures just months before.in all my years of vehicle ownership, i have never experienced a complete failure of a fixed metal brake line.they are usually make of materials which prevent corrosion of the metal and therefore remain useful for stopping the vehicle throughout the vehicle useful life.

The contact owns a 2001 gmc yukon 2500. The contact stated while starting the vehicle after it had been sitting 4 days it became apparent that the brakes and power steering had failed. The vehicle was towed to dealer where the failure could not be replicated. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was contacted about the issue. The failure and current mileage was 62,000. The vin was not available.

2001 yukon xl abs control module total failure at 49k miles.this is a common problem that is well known and documented. Total failure of the abs system is a serious safety issue. Gm continues to charge approximately $2000 to temporarily "fix" this problem by replacing the abs control module, only to have it fail again after another 20-40k miles.the problem has fostered a cottage industry providing abs control modules with superior components for 1/10th gm price.it is obvious gm is fully aware there is a serious defect in the kelsey/hayes abs control module due to inferior design and component selection, but so far refuses to acknowledge responsibilities or provide reliable repair.

The contact owns a 2001 gmc yukon 2500. The contact stated while starting the vehicle after it had been sitting 4 days it became apparent that the brakes and power steering had failed. The vehicle was towed to dealer where the failure could not be replicated. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was contacted about the issue. The failure and current mileage was 62,000. The vin was not available.

The contact owns a 2001 gmc yukon xl 2500.the contact stated that the pin box for the trailer hitch is supposed to be horizontal, but it is slightly bent.the vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated that the pin box was bending/deforming.the hitch was replaced at 14,800 miles.the pin box is currently bending again.the trailer hitch is used six times per year to tow a trailer.the current mileage is 27,353 and failure mileage was 15,600.




Read more




© 2024 All rights reserved