We found the following complaints for GMC SILVERADO (2002)
Read complaints for GMC SILVERADO (2002)
While driving approximately 30 mphconsumer suddenly lost control, causing the vehicle to crash into a tree. Upon impact,air bags did not deploy.
Consumer was traveling on the highway andwithout prior warning came to a sudden stop, andairbags didn't go off. Dealership was aware ofproblem.
Manifold bolts are breaking off and causing exhaust leaks.
There is black soot in the tail pipe from vehicle running rich. *phand the consumer fears that the catalytic converter will be destroyed. The vehicle only has 7700 miles.
Problems with the vehicle jack, after experiencing a tire blow out.(nar) *ph
While traveling at 35 mph a deer ran out in front of my truck. I heavily applied the brakes and immediately the brake pedal traveled to the floor. All brake fluid dump out and the vehicle veered off into the woods. After getting the vehicle towed home i discovered the "hard" brake lines had heavy rust and corrosion and had developed a pin leak which ruptured upon pressing. I have owned several vehicles over the years and i have never seen corrosion on brake lines like this truck. I ordered the parts and was told by a factory gm mechanic that this is a very common problem with these vehicles.
- the contact owns a 2002 silverado gmc with an odometer reading of 111,000. While driving between three and ten mph the vehicle accelerates and the brakes lock. The contact's vehicle has all of the parameters of the current recall #05v379. The recall details indicates: certain pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles may experience unwanted antilock brake system (abs) activation. This condition is more likely to occur in environmentally corrosive areas. This recall will be launched in the "salt belt" states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, maryland, massachusetts, maine, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhoda island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin and the district of columbia only. The contact believes that the sensors were not tested for corrosion on the new models. The first incident occurred at 70,000 miles and continues to happen on a daily basis and over time has gotten progressively worse. The contact called general motors customer service department and was informed that his vehicle does not qualify for the recall. The contact disagrees with general motors decision not to honor the recall.
Read more
