We found the following complaints for FORD FORD (Unknown)
Read complaints for FORD FORD (Unknown)
Letter from senator nelson on behalf of constituent re a recall notice in july 2016 from ford about replacing a part for takata airbag. *ldupdated 6/9/2017
S10 appropriate handling- letter to the secretary from consumer re: copy of letter to mark field, president & ceo of ford motor company- world headquarters regarding the takata air bag safety recall.the consumer stated it has been nine months, since he received the recall.
2010 ford. Consumer writes in regards to parts being unavailable for safety recall 18v-046. *ld
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to nhtsa safety recall 18v-023. *ld
Letter from senator nelson on behalf of constituent regarding takata airbags (recall in cars over 3 years/ford motor company). *ld
Ford mustang. Consumer writes in regards to passenger side airbag safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated the airbags should be disconnected until the recall can be performed.
Consumer states that airbags did not deploy during vehicle accident. *ldthe consumer stated many injuries were received from the accident that required extensive care.
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to passenger airbag safety recall. *ld
Letter from senator baldwin on behalf of constituent re ford airbag recall.the consumer was informed, the parts were not available.
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to passenger side frontal airbag safety recall. *ld
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to passenger side airbag safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount time completing the recall repair. Updated 10/1/2017
Brakes lock up, result in an accident, airbag did not deploy.
Ford fusion and mustang. Consumer writes in regards to information on airbag recall. *ldupdated 04/10/2017
Ford. Consumer is writing in regards to airbag safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated the manufacturer exceeded areasonable amount of time completing the recall repair.
Problems with air bag warning light illuminated on dashboard.*mrdealer was notified about defective vehicle.
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to defective light control box. *ldconsumer received ford safety recall: 15539. Consumer took vehicle to herb chambers ford dealership (braintree, ma) where he was informed that he would have to pay for the repair. Consumer took vehicle to quirk ford agency (quincy, ma) where they refused to do the repair. Manufacturer has been contacted but has provided no assistance. *dl
Letter from senator manchin on behalf of constituent re the ford sync system (provide a direct reply to the constituent).
Ford f550. Consumer writes in regards to chassis trucks dashboard visibility during daylight hours. *ld
Ignition failure caused vehicle to catch fire.
No summary( dot number: )
No summary( dot number: )
E-mail fm steven aguiar (ca).mrford vehicles are identified as having defective ignition modules causing vehicles to stall on the highway or misleading vehicle owners toidentify the problem as being a warranty issue and not a defect/dot 2003-2286.scc
We were origanlly told our car needed a new computer chip,we now believe it was a blown headgasket the entire time. The car ran "alright" for a month or so,but never quite the same,after we got the chip, the check engine light always remained on,the dealer said they would have to re-start the computer,and addtional $200.00. We drove it for another month,until it finally just quit. After talking to several different mechanic's they all informed us it was a blown head-gasket all along. Several other t-bird owners have told us the exact same thing happened to them,at approx. The same milage. Has there or will there be a recall on the head-gaskets?ow many complaints do they need to recieve,before they will re-call a vehicle?( dot number: )
Foia request for certified record nhtsa campaign id n. 99v-062 ford safety recall no. 99s09.(nar)*ph
Ignition switch failed prior to recall notice.
Ignition switch fire.
Ignition switch failed.
Ignition switch failed.
Ignition switch failed, causing an accident.
While the consumer was driving smoke and fumes came out from the dash and behind the steering wheel.
Ford fusion. Consumer writes in regard to illuminated check engine light. *ldthe consumer stated the vehicle needed replacement parts for fuel/air induction system. One of the parts needed were only available through an aftermarket dealer. The consumer stated the alarm would sound and the cabin lights would turn on randomly, while not operating the vehicle. The remote key would fail randomly. The gem monitor failed also, needing parts no longer manufactured through ford. After having the gem monitor repaired, the door locks failed.
S10 direct reply-letter from re ford motor's 3,000 throttle housing units that are on back order. (send [email protected] with an informational copy of the response for their records). *tgwthe consumer stated her 81 year old mother was driving, when she lost power to the vehicle. Once at 25 mph and the second time, at 60 mph.
Ford pick up. Consumer writes in regards to twin tank fuel leakage safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated the engine in the vehicle died. The fuel moved from the rear tank to the front tank. The rear tank couldn't be used unless the front tank was empty.
Inquiry from congressman ted deutch on behalf of his constituent, re: ford dealership coolant recall complaint. *ldthe consumer stated the dealer attempted to charge a diagnostic fee for what should be covered under the coolant recall.
Ford f-150. Consumer writes in regards to hesitation while accelerating. *ldthe consumer stated the vehicle has a rotten egg smell, it hesitates upon accelerating, runs rough, loss of power, and has poor gas, mileage.
Dangerous stalling problem with vehicle. *mr *sc
The vehicle had broke down within the specified warranty periods.ford denied the warranty because the consumer cannot show receipts of oil and filter purchased and installed over the past two years.*mrscc
The manufacturer issued a recall and installed a device that stops the engine fan from causing fire when it overheats. However the engine started over heating since the fan was turned off. (recall 00v-367 nhtsa and manufacturer 00s44).
Water pump leaking.
Radiator replaced by ford dealer (motorcraft) at 110k miles, seal began to leak after 20000 miles (130k miles), ford will not warranty. *nlm
Premature engine mount failure. *dh
Motor malfunction caused vehicle to catch on fire. *mrthere was a binding noise that had come from the engine or the transmission, the consumer noticed a huge puff of smoke, pulled over, and tried to suppress the fire.(ford box van 1991) *scc
The vehicle stalled on several occasions, however the dealer was unable to find the cause of the problem.
Head gasket failed.nlm
We were origanlly told our car needed a new computer chip,we now believe it was a blown headgasket the entire time. The car ran "alright" for a month or so,but never quite the same,after we got the chip, the check engine light always remained on,the dealer said they would have to re-start the computer,and addtional $200.00. We drove it for another month,until it finally just quit. After talking to several different mechanic's they all informed us it was a blown head-gasket all along. Several other t-bird owners have told us the exact same thing happened to them,at approx. The same milage. Has there or will there be a recall on the head-gaskets?ow many complaints do they need to recieve,before they will re-call a vehicle?( dot number: )
Head gasket failed.nlm
Head gasket failed.nlm
Piston defect in v10 engine.
Foia fwd fm webmaster request documents pertaining to ford blown spark plugs fm any ford vehicles fm 1997-2002. *mr *sc
Engine burned up due to a lack of oil changes. *sd
Engine knocks.
Severe stalling problem, due to a defective tfi modual, which prevents the spark plugs from sparking.
Engine dying out.
Ford explorer. Consumer writes in regards to exhaust system. *ldthe consumer stated the united states police force vehicles have a hole in the catalytic converter and muffler. This failure causes the muffler to release moisture and exhaust fumes that can reach the cab of the vehicle.
Egr valve failed.
Problems with manifold on lincoln mercury vehicle.*mr consumer didn't qualify for the recall because only police vehicles were included. Consumer felt this was a case of fraud. The consumer had to take a seven hour 350 mile drive outside of his family vacation to pick up the replacement part. The town the vehicle broke down in didn't have the part in stock. *ph
Consumer stated he is having difficulty getting the manufacturer to replace a defective intake manifold, other than for public use vehicles.
The intake manifold failure occurred while driving.the vehicle overheated and had become damaged.*sc
Ford explorer. Consumer writes in regards to exhaust system. *ldthe consumer stated the united states police force vehicles have a hole in the catalytic converter and muffler. This failure causes the muffler to release moisture and exhaust fumes that can reach the cab of the vehicle.
Consumer was never notified of recall notice 98v009000 relating to the head lights.
Ford f-150. Consumer writes in regards to hesitation while accelerating. *ldthe consumer stated the vehicle has a rotten egg smell, it hesitates upon accelerating, runs rough, loss of power, and has poor gas, mileage.
Cpsc#x1b0146a. Ford. Consumer stated while filling up her truck the gas would leak out. *lnthe fuel filler neck and fuel pump were replaced.
Ford pick up. Consumer writes in regards to twin tank fuel leakage safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated the engine in the vehicle died. The fuel moved from the rear tank to the front tank. The rear tank couldn't be used unless the front tank was empty.
Consumer states while driving, the engine died due to fuel pump failure, ford motorhome.
Cpsc#x1b0146a. Ford. Consumer stated while filling up her truck the gas would leak out. *lnthe fuel filler neck and fuel pump were replaced.
Fuel pump failed, causing noise.
Fuel filler pipe leak. *sd
Ford f-150. Consumer writes in regards to an unsatisfactory experience at local dealer related to recall repairs *tgwwhen the consumer called the dealer, he was informed there were no parts available.the consumer stated he called weekly, and received the same answer. Finally, the dealer received the parts. However, when he arrived, he was informed the parts were no longer available.the next day, the consumer went to another dealer and the straps were replaced.
Ford truck. Consumer writes in regards to recall on gas tank straps *tgwthe consumer stated the service rep at the dealer stated even though the straps were replaced, the pin holes in the gas tank was very common and the truck was old. The dealer stated they complied with the recall, and there was nothing else they could do.
When filling up truck gas will leak out. First i thought when filling truck the gas spilled. Later when truck only made a sound as if it was going to start but then did not. Truck was towed to local mech/auto repair where it was stated i needed a fuel pump & fuel filler neck hose had a hole in it. Replaced left me in financial hardship.
Ford f550. Consumer writes in regards to chassis trucks dashboard visibility during daylight hours. *ld
Consumer writes in regards to ford fusion and milan door handle defects *tgwthe consumer stated the door handles were made out of plastic and can snap off in an accident.
Ford f-150. Consumer writes in regards to door latch safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated the dealer cannot or will not perform the recall repair.
Ford transit. Consumer writes in regards to door latch safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated the dealer would not honor the safety recall 20v-331.
Email to the deputy administration from congressman kildee regarding concerns about reports that ford has asserted that issues with uncontrolled changes in gears in not a safety issue. *ldthe consumer stated the ford needed to address the concerns of unsafe transmissions.
Ford f-150. Consumer writes in regards to hesitation while accelerating. *ldthe consumer stated the vehicle has a rotten egg smell, it hesitates upon accelerating, runs rough, loss of power, and has poor gas, mileage.
Speedometer failed, causing noise.
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to power steering issue. *ldthe consumer stated the power steering went out. But, in 2014 the power steering had a recall that required the computer to be reset even though the vehicle had not yet experienced a failure. The consumer was advised since the recal was satisfied there was nothing else the manufacturer could do to assist with the failure. Updayed 05/16/2017
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle downshifting while driving. *ldthe consumer stated the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time completing the recall repair.
Letter from congressman regarding constituent re complaints about 2005/6/7 ford motor vehicles cvt transmission (dot/i#: h-2012 274).the consumer stated the transmission failed on his vehicle.
2011 ford f-150. Constituent writes regarding power train automatic transmission and thepower train automatic transmission control module (pcm,tcm) nhtsa safety recalls. *ld
Excessive banging in transmission from park to drive gear, repaired under recall. (97s75)
Consumer writes in regards to defective parts for a van. Recall# 12v006000. *tgw
Ford f 150. Consumer writes in regards to defective hubs on vehicle. *ldthe consumer stated the vehicle had defective hubs. The defect was located at the intersection of the flange and the bearing. The defect could lead to stress fractures and catastrophic part failures. Updated 09/27/2017
Recall #97s75, dealer waiting on part.
The transfer case leaked.
Consumer believes child proof back seat belts should be installed in vehicles for children (regulation).
Recall notice not recieved for the installation of seat belt buckles.
Seat belt buckle mechanism fell apart when attempting to buckle in child safety seat.*skd
Belt buckle difficult to open, additional vehicle on 479616. *tw
Defective seat.
Driver's seat metal bracket broke, causing seat back to collapse.*aw
Consumer writes in regards to vehicle brake pedal system malfunction issues.*ldthe consumer stated while driving the brake pedal went to the floor. The vehicle ran through a red light hitting another vehicle. The vehicle was repaired but the failure recurred. Updated 07/10/2017
Letter expressing concerns about the safety of the design of the ford club wagons and e-vans.the consumer owned several ford models, and during that time, he stated the vehicle was difficult to steer, and there was an unusual vibration in the steering. Another problem was a shimmy coming from the front brakes, which the dealer was never able to solve. The other vehicles had loose steering and the consumer replaced the connecting rods and stabilizers and another vehicle pulled to the side, just like the previous models he owned.
Lose of anti lock brakes without prior warning, resulting in a accident.
Anti lock brakes on the ford vehicle failed resulting in vehicle hitting dot worker causing serious injury. (attorney for consumer).
Brake failure. *sd
Brakes fail after several repair attempts.*aw
Brakes lock up, result in an accident, airbag did not deploy.
Brakes failed, causing loss of control/accident.(new jersey state police department)*skd
Brakes failed. *sd
The vehicle brakes failed causing shimmy/vibration in the steering wheel.nlm
Warped front brake rotors.
Consumer states rotors went out without warning and have been replaced twice within 20000 miles.
Brake rotors failed.
Warped front brake rotors.
Consumer writes in regards to recall 15v-340, and vehicle windshield and door issues.the consumer when the sun was shining, it reflected off the dashboard. Also, the door would close on the consumer's leg, if she was not parked on a leveled ground.
Consumer writes in regards to power steering failure recall notice problems.
Consumer writes in regards to vehicle steering malfunction.the consumer stated he hit some black ice and started spinning out of control. He managed to correct the vehicle. However, moments later the steering failed and he had no control of the vehicle. It was enough to push him up a small bank which caused the vehicle to turn over on its side. The vehicle was totaled.
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to power steering issue. *ldthe consumer stated the power steering went out. But, in 2014 the power steering had a recall that required the computer to be reset even though the vehicle had not yet experienced a failure. The consumer was advised since the recal was satisfied there was nothing else the manufacturer could do to assist with the failure. Updayed 05/16/2017
The consumer received a recall notice regarding the tie rod and drag links, following the repair, the consumer noticed the steering position had moved from its original to more a vertical position, the recreational vehicle was returned to the dealer to reposition the steering wheel.months later consumer noticed the right front tire had worn into the wear bars on the outer rim of the tire, it was determined both tires were damaged and the total toe was 1.05 inches which was more than allowable. *ph
Letter expressing concerns about the safety of the design of the ford club wagons and e-vans.the consumer owned several ford models, and during that time, he stated the vehicle was difficult to steer, and there was an unusual vibration in the steering. Another problem was a shimmy coming from the front brakes, which the dealer was never able to solve. The other vehicles had loose steering and the consumer replaced the connecting rods and stabilizers and another vehicle pulled to the side, just like the previous models he owned.
Ford explorer. Consumer writes in regards to power steering safety recall. *ldthe consumer stated there was a recall (14s06). The manufacturer would not assist with the recall repair due to the vehicle's mileage. The consumer requested to be reimbursed for the days of work missed.
Ford explorer. Consumer writes in regards to steering wheel pulling. *ldthe consumer expressed difficulty with having the vehicle repaired under warranty. The manufacturer was notified.
Ltr fm james henderson (ny) re the defective 1997 mercury tracer...*mrthe consumer and his wife owned two ford vehicles and both experienced broken rear springs.ford refused to consider compensation for the manufacturing defect.the right outer tie rods were installed and the rear springs were replaced.other consumers with the same make and modelexperienced the same problem.(1997 mercury tracer and 1999 ford escort)scc
The center for auto safety is renewing its call for ford to undertake a recall of all model year (my) explorers to address a potentially deadly hazard: carbon monoxide leaking into the vehicles cabin. *ld
Driver lost control and began to flip over, the vehicle came to rest in the passing lane, 2 occupants sustained injuries (mississippi uniform crash report,bridgestone/firestone, p235/75r15, wilderness at m/s, vdhl1py147, left rear).nlm
Consumer writes in regards to recall 15v-340, and vehicle windshield and door issues.the consumer when the sun was shining, it reflected off the dashboard. Also, the door would close on the consumer's leg, if she was not parked on a leveled ground.
Driver lost control and began to flip over, the vehicle came to rest in the passing lane, 2 occupants sustained injuries (mississippi uniform crash report,bridgestone/firestone, p235/75r15, wilderness at m/s, vdhl1py147, left rear).nlm
There were hole(s) found on the fuel tank steps.the consumer was getting the dump truck inspected when he was told that this problem was not covered by warranty.*scc *nlm
Driver lost control and began to flip over, the vehicle came to rest in the passing lane, 2 occupants sustained injuries (mississippi uniform crash report,bridgestone/firestone, p235/75r15, wilderness at m/s, vdhl1py147, left rear).nlm
Tailgate failed.
Tailgate failed.
Prior to recall 98v-323 vehicle experienced stress, corrosion and cracking resulting in fracture and loss of structural integrity.consumer claims to have never received recall notice.when attempting to have vehicle repaired, dealer stated that the recall had already been performed and the recall is no longer in effect.consumer has filed a complaint with consumer protection.manufacturer notified.
Consumer unable to have recall 98s36 on rear lower subframe mount nut performed due to dealers lack of parts.
Letter expressing concerns about the safety of the design of the ford club wagons and e-vans.the consumer owned several ford models, and during that time, he stated the vehicle was difficult to steer, and there was an unusual vibration in the steering. Another problem was a shimmy coming from the front brakes, which the dealer was never able to solve. The other vehicles had loose steering and the consumer replaced the connecting rods and stabilizers and another vehicle pulled to the side, just like the previous models he owned.
Vehicle was traveling and lost all steering and collided with wall, caused by the left tie rod end breaking.
The parts were not available for coil spring recall repairs.
Consumer states left front bearing and left front sway bar link went out with no warning.
Consumer states left front bearing and left front sway bar link went out with no warning.
Ltr fm james henderson (ny) re the defective 1997 mercury tracer...*mrthe consumer and his wife owned two ford vehicles and both experienced broken rear springs.ford refused to consider compensation for the manufacturing defect.the right outer tie rods were installed and the rear springs were replaced.other consumers with the same make and modelexperienced the same problem.(1997 mercury tracer and 1999 ford escort)scc
The vehicle had 5 flat tires which had to be replaced, one tire was patched on 3 occasions and another was patched twice, the consumer replaced all tires and requested reimbursement but was denied because the failures/replacement did not fall within the program dates,firestone wilderness.
Driver lost control and began to flip over, the vehicle came to rest in the passing lane, 2 occupants sustained injuries (mississippi uniform crash report,bridgestone/firestone, p235/75r15, wilderness at m/s, vdhl1py147, left rear).nlm
The vehicle had 5 flat tires which had to be replaced, one tire was patched on 3 occasions and another was patched twice, the consumer replaced all tires and requested reimbursement but was denied because the failures/replacement did not fall within the program dates,firestone wilderness.
New set of michelin tires purchased, one blew out, other three separated.
Driver lost control and began to flip over, the vehicle came to rest in the passing lane, 2 occupants sustained injuries (mississippi uniform crash report,bridgestone/firestone, p235/75r15, wilderness at m/s, vdhl1py147, left rear).nlm
Consumer believes defective tires and rims should be recalled.nlm
Driver lost control and began to flip over, the vehicle came to rest in the passing lane, 2 occupants sustained injuries (mississippi uniform crash report,bridgestone/firestone, p235/75r15, wilderness at m/s, vdhl1py147, left rear).nlm
Consumer states he replaced his firestone tires with goodyear tires, however now the ride is hard, consumer did not give any specific information regarding the goodyear tires.
Firestone tires had tread separation and irregular tread wear.nlm
Firestone radial tire (p215 85 r16) experienced tread separation, consumer requests firestone replace other tires.
While driving the right rear tread separated from the tire general tire).nlm
Consumer requested the address to the ford parts department.
We were origanlly told our car needed a new computer chip,we now believe it was a blown headgasket the entire time. The car ran "alright" for a month or so,but never quite the same,after we got the chip, the check engine light always remained on,the dealer said they would have to re-start the computer,and addtional $200.00. We drove it for another month,until it finally just quit. After talking to several different mechanic's they all informed us it was a blown head-gasket all along. Several other t-bird owners have told us the exact same thing happened to them,at approx. The same milage. Has there or will there be a recall on the head-gaskets?ow many complaints do they need to recieve,before they will re-call a vehicle?( dot number: )
Unspecified.
1993 and 1994 ford f150 and 1983 through 2007 crown victoria.consumer alleges these ford model vehicles contain safety defects which are dangerous to consumers and that the manufacturer are not forthcoming with information.*tgwupdated 05/11/10.updated 10/01/10updated 12/01/11updated 01/04/12
Ford. Consumer writes in regards to having difficulty receiving a safe rental vehicle from ford. *ld
Sudden accelerated when brake are pressed traveling or slowing down. Vehicle acts as if the gas pedal is pressed instead of brake.
Consumer states never received recall notice 97v025000 relating to fuel throttle, linkages and control.
S10 direct reply-letter from re ford motor's 3,000 throttle housing units that are on back order. (send [email protected] with an informational copy of the response for their records). *tgwthe consumer stated her 81 year old mother was driving, when she lost power to the vehicle. Once at 25 mph and the second time, at 60 mph.
Ford granada. Consumer writes in regards to loss of power steering. *ldthe consumer stated the cruise control would not turn off unless the engine was powered off.
Nar 9-12-03. Foia request certified copies of info/documents between nhtsa/ford and any other party re defective cruise control system/throttle linkage/cable in the 1999-2001 fordexplorer /mercury mountaineer,es have no records.
Rear defroster failed.
Heater failed and repaired.
Hub/cap problems.
Problems with rim equipment on vehicle. *mr prior to the incident, tires were installed on the vehicle. The next day the consumer discovered one of the rims were missing, and while driving back to the shop to see if the mechanic forgot to put the rim back on, she viewed one of the rims gliding onto the highway nearly missing another vehicle.the consumer stopped to check the other rims, in which it didn't take much effort to remove them. *scc
Firestone dealer lost the special lug nut adapter and rather than seek a replacement, it was replaced with a regular nut almost ruining, causing consumer to keep purchasing expensive firestone tires.
Consumer believes defective tires and rims should be recalled.nlm
Read more
