We found the following complaints for FORD E-250 (1995)
Read complaints for FORD E-250 (1995)
Vehicle was struck at intersection in front passenger's door, ratchet on driver's seat belt released upon impact, causing driver to slip out of seat belt and was ejected from vehicle;also, driver's air bag did not deploy.
Transmission torque converter failed. *sd
Transmission failed and caught fire.
Transmission torque converter failed. *sd
Vehicle was struck at intersection in front passenger's door, ratchet on driver's seat belt released upon impact, causing driver to slip out of seat belt and was ejected from vehicle;also, driver's air bag did not deploy.
Abs warning light illuminates, indicating a malfunction within the system. When applying abs brakes on wetor dry pavement in emergency stopping,wheels lock up, causing the vehicle to skid in different directions.please give any further details.the vehicle computer code indicating failure was cleared.*tc
During brake application, vehicle drifts @ 30-35 mph. If vehicle is loaded with 500lbs or more it will not stop. Explain in more detail.
When applying the brakes consumer states that it feels as if he is skidding on ice then the brakes will catch, consumer has also taken the vehicle in for brake service five times with no remedy.
Both front rotors cracked w/excessive wear grinding metal to metal immediately. Please describe details.tt
Double brake (fluid) line failure back-to-back, almost simultaneously, resulting in no brakes at all.vehicle is older, failure due to brake line rust out.(this is the third older vehicle experiencing this failure within the same age/mileage range, all within the last four years.i am suspecting accelerated oxidation due to "super-salt" used in highway de-icing in recent years.)
Gas/brake pedal too close together, causing them to be depressed simultaneously, resulting in an accident.
Driver switched lanes to avoid accident, upon returning to his lane the van lost it's steering control.he proceeded to go off the road into an embankment and the wheels broke off.
On august 4, 2010, my 22 year old son was a passenger in a ford econoline e 250 van on his way to work, when the driver some how lost control, hit the guardrail and was ejected along withmy son!the driver went out first and took the worst of the impact. However, he is still alive with massive injuries. My son was thrown out second across the hwy and died from blunt force trauma to his head and torso. The 3rd passenger was removed with the jaws of life. My son nor the driver were wearing seat belts from what i've been told. However, i was also told that it may not have mattered due to the impact. The 3rd person was in the back anda seat belt was not available, he was sitting on a "make shift" type seat(?) my question is...why did this van sustain this much massive damage from a one vehicle crash? how did the "crash dummies" survive? although, it is an older model,(1995) there's seems to be no reason why this amount of damage resulted from a one vehicle accident. From what i know so far, road conditions nor excessive speed were an issue. I would like to know how this particular van did in front impact collision testing. I want to know what type of changes have been made to insure that your newer vans do not "crumble" in this manner? i'm more than sure airbags would have helped tremendously!but, it seems as though the van should have, or could have been a lot more sturdier built???? i need answers as to why my first born son was killed in such a horrific one van crash. They didn't run into an 18 wheeler or a train...it was the guardrail!!! please help me and his younger brother to understand how this happened.updated ivoq 11/02/10
Hood opened, while vehicle in motion, slamming into windshiled shattering it.the fiberglass was overheated and peeled away causing latch to break.
The vehicle shakes uncontrolably when it reaches speeds of 55mph or more. This causes the driver to lose control of the vehicle. Please describe.
Goodyear wrangler ht tires (p245 75) experience splitting in the sidewalls.
On august 4, 2010, my 22 year old son was a passenger in a ford econoline e 250 van on his way to work, when the driver some how lost control, hit the guardrail and was ejected along withmy son!the driver went out first and took the worst of the impact. However, he is still alive with massive injuries. My son was thrown out second across the hwy and died from blunt force trauma to his head and torso. The 3rd passenger was removed with the jaws of life. My son nor the driver were wearing seat belts from what i've been told. However, i was also told that it may not have mattered due to the impact. The 3rd person was in the back anda seat belt was not available, he was sitting on a "make shift" type seat(?) my question is...why did this van sustain this much massive damage from a one vehicle crash? how did the "crash dummies" survive? although, it is an older model,(1995) there's seems to be no reason why this amount of damage resulted from a one vehicle accident. From what i know so far, road conditions nor excessive speed were an issue. I would like to know how this particular van did in front impact collision testing. I want to know what type of changes have been made to insure that your newer vans do not "crumble" in this manner? i'm more than sure airbags would have helped tremendously!but, it seems as though the van should have, or could have been a lot more sturdier built???? i need answers as to why my first born son was killed in such a horrific one van crash. They didn't run into an 18 wheeler or a train...it was the guardrail!!! please help me and his younger brother to understand how this happened.updated ivoq 11/02/10
Received letters (originally from 2006) regarding recall 05s28 - speed control system modification.took vehicle to dealership in august 2007, where they disconnected speed controller, and said parts would be in3 weeks. Called back in sept, said parts would be in october. Called in october, told december. Called in february, now told april. I am trying to escalate with ford, but any answers from them are not credible, as they now have a history of giving dates in the future so i "go away" for now. Ford seems to have no plans to fix or replace this, so in the future i will not be taking vehicles in for a recall until i can confirm that all parts are on-hand *before* i arrive.i don't think this is a good result of ford's ignoring the recall (by not ordering an appropriate quantity of parts in a timely manner, starting in 2006).
Driver switched lanes to avoid accident, upon returning to his lane the van lost it's steering control.he proceeded to go off the road into an embankment and the wheels broke off.
Read more
