Enter VIN number
Get the most accurate report for the vehicle. Basic information is FREE
Use this form now and GET 20% DISCOUNT for CarVertical reports!




We found the following complaints for BMW 325XI (2004)

Read complaints for BMW 325XI (2004)


My vehicle has a recall on the air bags

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v313000 (air bags); however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received a manufacturers recall related to the air bags however, the part needed to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not notified of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

Takata recall - recall announced may 2015.bmw na claims replacement parts still not available.bmw na claims next communication to affected owners will be in january 2017.is bmw na complying with the timeline for completing this recall?

Takata recall:the contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v318000 (air bags); however, the part needed to perform the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was notified of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.

Takata recall- the contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact stated that the recall notice for nhtsa campaign number: 15v318000 (air bags) was received in june of 2015. After contacting the dealer and the manufacturer on multiple occasions, the contact was informed that the parts needed to repair the vehicle were still not available and no estimated time for receiving the parts could be given. The contact had not experienced a failure. The vin was not available.

Bmw jointly owned vehicle, was not returned to customers on demand, nor swapped as is customary business practice (i.e. Bmw repair/recalled for bmw loaner car), and held for unreasonable amount of time. Bmw recalled the vehicle, in part,defective airbags, and was to send a consent form to the customers prior to ordering parts/repairs. The customers never received the consent form as assured and expressed concerns about the bmw who damaged the vehicle in their possession or disabled state. July 15, 2016 bmwflatbed delivered with unidentified chemicals/toxins that resulted in front end physical damages and/or toxins in bmw that resulted in "poison exposure", toxology tests pending. The toxins maybe airbag chemicals, sodium azide, hydrazoic acid, or others,and need bmw tested. Please inform on who specifically performs these tests or agency that does quickly due to the toxic nature. Bmw had a duty to disclose these facts to customers, insurance, government, and others. 49 usc safety act 30101.dot states 'loaner vehicle' is customary practice in airbag recall, an obligation oem dealership, thus request the process in securing the loaner vehicle or reinstatement. Bmw by affiliates, unilaterally took bmw loaner without providing a repaired bmw, unfair exchange, and was returned in a disabled status. 'but for' wrecked/recalled defective bmw, a loaner would not have been required, safety act, 49 usc 30101. Please respond in writing, the process to (1) secure chemical tests; (2)vehicle safety review or decontamination, and (3) loaner car approval process for insurance. Nhtsa safety act, 49 usc 30101 delegated by secretary of transportation, 49 cfr 1.95, inspect/investigate 30166(b)(1); civil penalties30165(b); ensure recalled 30118-119; adequacy of recalls 49 usc 30120(c)(1), accelerate remedy programs 30120(c)(3);and other 49 usc 30166(g): bmw loaner

The contactā€™s girlfriend owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 20v018000 (air bags). The contactā€™s girlfriend took the vehicle to the local dealer for the recall repair. After the vehicle was repaired and the vehicle was retrieved, the air bag warning light was illuminated. The driver took the vehicle back to the local dealer for the warning light. The mechanic inspected the vehicle and informed the contact that the battery cable needed to be replaced. The contact was concerned that the failure was related to the recall repair. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 89,000.

Takata recall. The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v318000 (air bags). The part to do the recall repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available. Updated 06/14/16*ljupdated 06/16/16.

Ok. This car was brought in on 2/12/19 to the bmw dealer in appleton, wi. After that bmw has called me 3 times claiming he wasn't fixed. They were going to call the dealer. Now i have rec'd a letter from the dmv stating it wasn't fixed. I faxed the invoice dates 2/12/19 to bmw today. I give up. The contact is pete kempen 1-877-983-7473. Someone needs to figure out what is wrong.

Takata air bag recall - on may 27th, 2015 a recall to fix my make and model of bmw was issued. To date the manufacturer has not provided the repair parts necessary.it has been 9 months since the recall was issued. Why hasn't more pressure been put on takata and bmw to complete these repairs?

"takata recall"i received notice of the recall by mail on 8/24/16 stating that i needed the driver and passenger side airbags replaced. I then proceeded to make an appointment on august 29th with global imports bmw located at 500 interstate n pkwy, atlanta, ga 30339. The service representative informed me that the parts were not in stock and would need to be ordered. However the recall notice did state that the parts were in stock and ready to be installed. I waited 2 weeks and never received a follow up phone call on the status of the air bags. I then called global bmw again, and they had no record of me calling, and claimed that they needed to order the airbags. This same exact issue re-occurred on my follow up phone calls on september 12th and 23rd. Then finally on october 3rd i placed another follow up phone call where once again they did not have my information, but did have a driver side airbag in stock. The customer service representative informed me that she would be checking on the status of the passenger air bag and give me a call. I called back the next day to check, and was told that they were not sure when they could obtain a passenger airbag. Over a month of phone calls and still nothing done.i am less than pleased and very concerned for the safety of me and my family while driving our vehicle. It has become obvious that bmw doesn't care about fixing the issue.

Three recalls. Front drivers air bag, front passenger airbag, both rear quarter panel lamps carrier connector wires heated and melted. Contacted bmw of kingsport several times for assistance. Said would help but has not.need schematic of rear taillight assemblies and repair of airbags.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received a recall notification of nhtsa campaign numbers: 14v428000 (air bags) and 15v318000 (air bags); however, the part to do the repair was not available. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time to provide the part to do the repair. The contact had not experienced a failure.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 14v428000 (air bags); however, the part needed to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Updated 03/04/15*lj updated 6/15/2015

Takata recall. The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v318000 (air bags); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not notified of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.

Vehicle defects reported or recalled, bmw, oem, or other, yet with known defects was requested to drive an unsafe vehicle that is 'imminent danger' that can cause serious injury or death: airbags. Bmw replaced driver side airbag in 9/ 2014 then passenger side. Yet in 2015 accident, the airbags failed to detonate, and injury to persons/property occurred. Bmw recalled driver's side airbag (2nd repair/3rd airbag) in 2015 and parts are on back order. Bmw has the 'defective vehicle' (i.e. Other issues engine, seat belts, etc. Remain) and provided a bmw loaner car through their affiliated partner (toyota's jv alliance) enterprise in good faith pending repair. In june 2016, a 'cease & desist' was placed on the bmw, in part, due to a federal investigation or injury (i.e. Defective airbag- explosive device~shooting shrapnel) that leaves 'driver in harm's way'. One could infer 'attempted murder' if the driver is placed behind the wheel of a defective vehicle or airbag: millions of recalls. I am a material witness and am reporting intimidation, threats, hostility, and bullying over the bmw or defective airbags. This has resulted in professional defamation, personal injury, financial distress, and sabotage in various instances (to be reported in separate package to be sent to investigator due to confidentiality). The most recent occurred around june 23, 2016 when bmw/enterprise rental car stating "grand theft" of the vehicle in their possession or awaiting a swap? simple fact that bmw stated that an 'interim fix' was approved by dots but needed signed consent forms-- was sending them to me. Bmw did not follow procedures, 'unauthorized entry, removal, destruction' of airbag with a 'cease& desist'. On 6/24/16 going to enterprise/alamo-orlando was no issue/no unpaid bill. This did not stop continuation of harassment or retaliation (e.g. Asef) unconstitutional or uncivil conduct.

Takata recall. The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign numbers:14v428000 (air bags) and 15v318000 (air bags); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Parts distribution disconnect.

Bmw 325xi 2004, after substantial or unreasonable delay in the bmw return, was perceived to be rendered unsafe/unsatisfactory/incomplete, with airbag defects/spillover effects, or released with known defects to the vehicle that put the driver and unsuspecting occupants at risk of serious bodily injury up to death. Bmw was to send a 'consent form', then vehicle owner was to review/sign/return, bmw would then order 'interim airbag' parts, and repair. The consent form was not received or signed, june 2016, bmw enter/repair without authorization, or signed consent forms, and made unknown changes to the airbag/systems. The toxins remain has corroded it or released toxins/odor. The vehicle was on a 'cease & desist' airbag repair pending the receipt and execution of the consent form as agreed. Bmw failed to make the repairs per quote and airbag [i.e. Explosive device; sodium azide azium; shrapnel, etc.] was left in an unsafe state. The vehicle needs an inspection by nhtsa, as it is believed to be contaminated or corroded, by unknown toxins (i.e sodium azide or azium?). Persons exposed have contacted cdc/poison center who stated that persons not have further contact with bmw till inspected? see claim 10881628 for same/similar background. The owners were subjected to foreseeable toxins, from the airbag defects/recalls/ unauthorized repairs to the bmw, pending a "consent form", and has resulted in injury or medical care or poison control center consultations. The toxins had a 'sharp odor', overwhelming as reported, and exposure resulted in damages to persons or property, awaiting estimates to be completed. Importantly, exposure tosodium azide can be fatal and the vehicle needs an inspection by nhtsa or dot. If you do not inspect unsafe vehicles, with perceived safety concerns, please provide a referral or preferred source due to the serious public health and safety issues.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 14v428000 (air bags); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

My daughter got into an accident where the front fender and bumper hit the side section of another car going approx 20 mph on a city street and the air bags never deployed. Luckily no one was hurt.

Takata recall. The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v318000 (air bags); however, the part needed to perform the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was notified of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available. .....updated 08/11/16 updated 08/17/16.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v318000 (air bags); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The dealer stated that bmw had only been shipping parts to two states. The contact had not experienced a failure.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 14v428000 (air bags) however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

Nhtsa does not recognize the recalls on my 2004 bmw 325xi 4dr sedan. There were 2 recalls that are related to air bags. The nhtsa campaign numbers are #15v318000 and #14v428000. I would like to receive official confirmation that these recalls are valid so i can get the manufacturer to fix this. Please see the supporting docs attached. Also, i have been having weird electrical issues happening to the point the car wont shut off at times, headlights go out after a day, turn signal goes out, car dies, stereo wont work etc. I was wondering if other recalls were placed on this car as well?

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v318000 (air bags) however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not notified of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Vin tool confirms parts not available.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received a recall notice for the air bags in july of 2015. After contacting the dealer and the manufacturer on multiple occasions, the contact was informed that the parts needed to repair the vehicle were still not available and no estimated time for receiving the parts could be given. The vin and nhtsa campaign number were unknown. The contact had not experienced a failure.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 14v428000 (air bags) however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

The contact owned a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact stated while driving 45 mph, the vehicle was struck by another vehicle on the passengerā€™s side causing the passengerā€™s side mirror to detach from the vehicle. The contact loss control of the vehicle and crashed into the median. The vehicle rolled and then came to a complete stop. The contact stated that the air bags failed to deploy. Additionally, the dashboard collapsed and the rear-view mirror detached from the windshield. The vehicle was towed from the scene of the crash. The contact received injuries to the chest, ribs, neck, and breast for which medical assistance was sought. A police report was filed. The contact stated that the driver's frontal air bag was previously replaced under nhtsa campaign number: 15v318000 (air bags). The vehicle was destroyed. The manufacturer was not contacted or notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 100,000.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325i.while driving at an unknown speed, the contact was involved in a crash.the air bag deployment severely injured the consumer and caused a neck sprain and a mild concussion.a police report was filed.the contact did not provide any additional information regarding the crash.the vehicle has not been diagnosed by the dealer.the current and failure mileages were 50,000. Updated

The contactā€™s girlfriend owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 20v018000 (air bags). The contactā€™s girlfriend took the vehicle to the local dealer for the recall repair. After the vehicle was repaired and the vehicle was retrieved, the air bag warning light was illuminated. The driver took the vehicle back to the local dealer for the warning light. The mechanic inspected the vehicle and informed the contact that the battery cable needed to be replaced. The contact was concerned that the failure was related to the recall repair. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 89,000.

Right side signal light intermittent failure.when it finally failed there was a scorched wire.upon investigation found there is a tsb from the manufacturer but only in warranty.no recall.

Nhtsa does not recognize the recalls on my 2004 bmw 325xi 4dr sedan. There were 2 recalls that are related to air bags. The nhtsa campaign numbers are #15v318000 and #14v428000. I would like to receive official confirmation that these recalls are valid so i can get the manufacturer to fix this. Please see the supporting docs attached. Also, i have been having weird electrical issues happening to the point the car wont shut off at times, headlights go out after a day, turn signal goes out, car dies, stereo wont work etc. I was wondering if other recalls were placed on this car as well?

This is a formal petition for a safety defect investigation.my 2004 bmw 325xi has a left tail light that does not work because of a poor connection at the rear lamp connector (the ground wire receptacle and housing have burnt out because the ground is not strong enough for the current).my right tail light still functions but i am concerned about this side burning out as well and posing a possible fire hazard. Bmw has issued a service bulletin (si b 63 03 06) which addresses this issue and says that the cause is "minor corrosion at the 8-pin rear lamp connector creates high resistance causing damage to the connector housing."bmw has not issued a recall and i am worried about getting into an accident without a properly functioning tail light.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The wire that plugs into the driver side rear tail light harness burned which makes it impossible for the driver to alert others of his intentions regarding direction of travel and speed. Technical service bulletin # 10020856(exterior lighting:tail lights) summarizes the failure. The failure has not been remedied. Thecurrent and failuremileages were 59,770. Updated 12/09/09the consumer stated the same failure happened on the passenger side. There was insufficient grounding which caused the burnout of the tail light wiring.

Nhtsa does not recognize the recalls on my 2004 bmw 325xi 4dr sedan. There were 2 recalls that are related to air bags. The nhtsa campaign numbers are #15v318000 and #14v428000. I would like to receive official confirmation that these recalls are valid so i can get the manufacturer to fix this. Please see the supporting docs attached. Also, i have been having weird electrical issues happening to the point the car wont shut off at times, headlights go out after a day, turn signal goes out, car dies, stereo wont work etc. I was wondering if other recalls were placed on this car as well?

Vehicle defects reported or recalled, bmw, oem, or other, yet with known defects was requested to drive an unsafe vehicle that is 'imminent danger' that can cause serious injury or death: airbags. Bmw replaced driver side airbag in 9/ 2014 then passenger side. Yet in 2015 accident, the airbags failed to detonate, and injury to persons/property occurred. Bmw recalled driver's side airbag (2nd repair/3rd airbag) in 2015 and parts are on back order. Bmw has the 'defective vehicle' (i.e. Other issues engine, seat belts, etc. Remain) and provided a bmw loaner car through their affiliated partner (toyota's jv alliance) enterprise in good faith pending repair. In june 2016, a 'cease & desist' was placed on the bmw, in part, due to a federal investigation or injury (i.e. Defective airbag- explosive device~shooting shrapnel) that leaves 'driver in harm's way'. One could infer 'attempted murder' if the driver is placed behind the wheel of a defective vehicle or airbag: millions of recalls. I am a material witness and am reporting intimidation, threats, hostility, and bullying over the bmw or defective airbags. This has resulted in professional defamation, personal injury, financial distress, and sabotage in various instances (to be reported in separate package to be sent to investigator due to confidentiality). The most recent occurred around june 23, 2016 when bmw/enterprise rental car stating "grand theft" of the vehicle in their possession or awaiting a swap? simple fact that bmw stated that an 'interim fix' was approved by dots but needed signed consent forms-- was sending them to me. Bmw did not follow procedures, 'unauthorized entry, removal, destruction' of airbag with a 'cease& desist'. On 6/24/16 going to enterprise/alamo-orlando was no issue/no unpaid bill. This did not stop continuation of harassment or retaliation (e.g. Asef) unconstitutional or uncivil conduct.

While driving in normal rush hour traffic my wife heard a loud pop from the engine compartment. The car lost power, brakes. She started to coast to the side of the road when other commuters started to yell at here to get out of the vehicle, at that time the cabin started to fill up with smoke. She tried to lower the window but that had lost power also. She was able to drive the car into the snow at the side of the road to stop it and then exited the vehicle. The 325xi started to burn and shortly was a total loss. Thank god she got out ok but was traumatized by the incident.since this happened we have found many similar fires documented on the web.

Bmw jointly owned vehicle, was not returned to customers on demand, nor swapped as is customary business practice (i.e. Bmw repair/recalled for bmw loaner car), and held for unreasonable amount of time. Bmw recalled the vehicle, in part,defective airbags, and was to send a consent form to the customers prior to ordering parts/repairs. The customers never received the consent form as assured and expressed concerns about the bmw who damaged the vehicle in their possession or disabled state. July 15, 2016 bmwflatbed delivered with unidentified chemicals/toxins that resulted in front end physical damages and/or toxins in bmw that resulted in "poison exposure", toxology tests pending. The toxins maybe airbag chemicals, sodium azide, hydrazoic acid, or others,and need bmw tested. Please inform on who specifically performs these tests or agency that does quickly due to the toxic nature. Bmw had a duty to disclose these facts to customers, insurance, government, and others. 49 usc safety act 30101.dot states 'loaner vehicle' is customary practice in airbag recall, an obligation oem dealership, thus request the process in securing the loaner vehicle or reinstatement. Bmw by affiliates, unilaterally took bmw loaner without providing a repaired bmw, unfair exchange, and was returned in a disabled status. 'but for' wrecked/recalled defective bmw, a loaner would not have been required, safety act, 49 usc 30101. Please respond in writing, the process to (1) secure chemical tests; (2)vehicle safety review or decontamination, and (3) loaner car approval process for insurance. Nhtsa safety act, 49 usc 30101 delegated by secretary of transportation, 49 cfr 1.95, inspect/investigate 30166(b)(1); civil penalties30165(b); ensure recalled 30118-119; adequacy of recalls 49 usc 30120(c)(1), accelerate remedy programs 30120(c)(3);and other 49 usc 30166(g): bmw loaner

The vehicle (1.6 turbo) has a hesitancy to engage in acceleration relative to pressing the accelerator pedal. Once engaged, it immediately jumps out to a quick, jolting and what feels like an uncontrollable start. This typically happens at stop/start intersections where the car comes to a full and complete stop. Yesterday, (07.20.16) the vehicle choked and sputtered and almost stalled on a small rise when traffic started moving through a just-turned green light at a very busy intersection during rush hour. The tachometer winds out in a manner disproportionate to the speedometer reading. This does not mimic the effects of a turbo lag. Rather, it feels like the vehicle isn't getting a timely delivery of gas to the engine firing mechanisms (we would liken it to a dirty fuel line or a clogged carburetor on older cars), or the dual clutch system is debating whether or not to get in gear when demanded, or whatever device that interprets driver commands (pedal pushing) to engine performance isn't responding efficiently. The car has had one shop visit for this issue and the dealer (werner hyundai, tallahassee) stated they 'reset the software." i will be taking the car back to the dealer the week of july 25, 2016. Unfortunately, i anticipate this issue will lead to a wreck, most likely from 1) being hit from behind as the car tries to figure out whether or not to accelerate, or 2) being t-boned at an intersection because the car won't accelerate through a rush-hour yellow light, or 3) being t-boned because my car launched (literally) out into oncoming traffic (that initially was at a safe distance away) once it got past the choke/sputter/stall point....updated 08/01/16

I purchased a 2004 bmw 330xi and had two problems that surfaced immediately.when calling the dealership, they brushed off the complaint stating that the car was new and it would "settle" given time.however, after the problems continued, i brought the car into a dealership who, upon inspection, told me i simply needed some new parts.one being a transmission (which i think is more than just a part).apparently, there is a directive to bmw dealerships highlighting the problem, but to deal with it only upon customer complaint.i find this very troubling given the nature of the problem(s) and the potential safety issue should the transmission completely fail. The issues are as follows:1.after only 2,000 miles, i had put an additional 7 quarts of oil in the vehicle.apparently, the oil valve is defective and needs to be replaced.2.when first operating the vehicle, the vehicle often would not begin to move until the rpm's reached anywhere from 3-5k rpm's.in both instances, the bmw dealer stated this was due to a defective "part".the replacement of the oil filter makes sense as it is a part.the complete replacement of a transmission, however, does not. Although i did not have an accident, i believe that these issues can potentially lead to a major problem and therefore respectfully request an investigation.

Three recalls. Front drivers air bag, front passenger airbag, both rear quarter panel lamps carrier connector wires heated and melted. Contacted bmw of kingsport several times for assistance. Said would help but has not.need schematic of rear taillight assemblies and repair of airbags.

Unreliable taillight/brakelight/turn signal functioning in 2004 bmw 325xi. Problem began in early 2008. Lighting indicators kept coming on suggesting taillights were out. Replaced all applicable bulbs several times over the past year then finally brought to dealer. They said that they have seen many of these instances where they need to replace carrier, harness and add a ground wire to fix the issue in order to get lights working again. Dangerous at night. Unfortunately no recalls, however, this is not a normal wear item and if a dealership needs to go back in and change wiring to make it work, than it's simply a design flaw and the consumer should not be responsible. Needless to say, $700 later, i had to get it fixed to ensure safe driving.

This is a very common problem for this year and model bmw car.at just under 45k miles, the exterior tail lights at times fail to work.the lights have been changed etc.i get notified from the inside dash board.however, at times it is a false positive (dash says it doesn't work but in fact it is working).then at times the warning lights switch from the left to the right tail lights.i am not sure when it is actually working and when it is not working - this is dangerous and bmw should fix this design flaw.this failure is due to poor materials usage (corrosion problem) and grounding like the other posts have mentioned.apparently there is a class lawsuit against bmw for this.with all these complaints for the same problem, i don't understand how it has not been recalled for fixing b/c failure to signal when changing lanes is a violation because it is dangerous.bmw needs to fix this.

The driver's side rear tail light assembly failed.received a warning indicator light on the dash panel.replacing the bulbs in the assembly failed to correct the problem.researching this issue i discovered there has been an equipment recall for failed tail light assemblies.

Rear tail light intermittently show failure.upon inspection, appears connection shows signs of premature wear and burning/overheating due to inadequate grounding.

This is a formal petition for a safety defect investigation.my 2004 bmw 325xi has a left tail light that does not work because of a poor connection at the rear lamp connector (the ground wire receptacle and housing have burnt out because the ground is not strong enough for the current).my right tail light still functions but i am concerned about this side burning out as well and posing a possible fire hazard. Bmw has issued a service bulletin (si b 63 03 06) which addresses this issue and says that the cause is "minor corrosion at the 8-pin rear lamp connector creates high resistance causing damage to the connector housing."bmw has not issued a recall and i am worried about getting into an accident without a properly functioning tail light.

Right side signal light intermittent failure.when it finally failed there was a scorched wire.upon investigation found there is a tsb from the manufacturer but only in warranty.no recall.

Consumer complaint regarding bmw 3 series high failure rate of the emergency flasher switch.(11/08/05)the consumer suggested that the european design be modified where there is no cup holder adjacent to the emergency flasher and switch to the usa design where the emergency flasher is less than 1 inch from the cup holder.*sc

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The wire that plugs into the driver side rear tail light harness burned which makes it impossible for the driver to alert others of his intentions regarding direction of travel and speed. Technical service bulletin # 10020856(exterior lighting:tail lights) summarizes the failure. The failure has not been remedied. Thecurrent and failuremileages were 59,770. Updated 12/09/09the consumer stated the same failure happened on the passenger side. There was insufficient grounding which caused the burnout of the tail light wiring.

While driving in normal rush hour traffic my wife heard a loud pop from the engine compartment. The car lost power, brakes. She started to coast to the side of the road when other commuters started to yell at here to get out of the vehicle, at that time the cabin started to fill up with smoke. She tried to lower the window but that had lost power also. She was able to drive the car into the snow at the side of the road to stop it and then exited the vehicle. The 325xi started to burn and shortly was a total loss. Thank god she got out ok but was traumatized by the incident.since this happened we have found many similar fires documented on the web.

The driver's side door latch freezes up and doesn't open unless you key in from outside.

2004 bmw 325xi electronic door locks fail to unlock intermittently whether i am outside the car or inside the car.the key fob will intermittently not unlock the doors.the internal mechanisms will not unlock the door including the door handles themselves once the lock is engaged.the failure is an electronic issue and is a significant safety issue if i cannot get out of the car.

E46 bmw 2004 325xi and 2000 323i both have issues unlocking doors when weather is above 50 degrees.vehicle wont let you unlock doors from inside and manual unlock is only for drivers door and must do so through window.if there were an accident in the car i don't know how i would have escaped in a reasonable amount of time.people in the back seat are forced to crawl into the front of the car and out the driver door.no manual unlock is available to any door but the drivers door.

A year ago, i brought my 2004 bmw 325 xi in for routine maintenance.when i picked the car up, the bmw shop explained that they found premature failure of the cv outer axle boots.both boots were split and leaking grease, and the axles were turning dry..they replaced both boots under warranty.in december 2010, car was vibrating while riding.they stated they had to replace the right front cv shaft (axle).they did this and the vibration stopped.naturally, this was not covered since my certified car warranty expired in july 2010.i believe bmw should have discovered the defect to the axle when they found it running dry in january. In driving the car before the repair, i believe bmw put me in jeopardy by not repairing the axle.this could definitely be a hazard, riding on a shaky defective axle.

The vehicle (1.6 turbo) has a hesitancy to engage in acceleration relative to pressing the accelerator pedal. Once engaged, it immediately jumps out to a quick, jolting and what feels like an uncontrollable start. This typically happens at stop/start intersections where the car comes to a full and complete stop. Yesterday, (07.20.16) the vehicle choked and sputtered and almost stalled on a small rise when traffic started moving through a just-turned green light at a very busy intersection during rush hour. The tachometer winds out in a manner disproportionate to the speedometer reading. This does not mimic the effects of a turbo lag. Rather, it feels like the vehicle isn't getting a timely delivery of gas to the engine firing mechanisms (we would liken it to a dirty fuel line or a clogged carburetor on older cars), or the dual clutch system is debating whether or not to get in gear when demanded, or whatever device that interprets driver commands (pedal pushing) to engine performance isn't responding efficiently. The car has had one shop visit for this issue and the dealer (werner hyundai, tallahassee) stated they 'reset the software." i will be taking the car back to the dealer the week of july 25, 2016. Unfortunately, i anticipate this issue will lead to a wreck, most likely from 1) being hit from behind as the car tries to figure out whether or not to accelerate, or 2) being t-boned at an intersection because the car won't accelerate through a rush-hour yellow light, or 3) being t-boned because my car launched (literally) out into oncoming traffic (that initially was at a safe distance away) once it got past the choke/sputter/stall point....updated 08/01/16

I bought bmw 325xi 2004 on 03/04 and i noticed that it has problem with cold start. In the morning, when i put the car in "d", it doesn't move and then suddenly lurches with a jerk. First i thought, its just because its a new car but when i didn't drive it for 3 days and started it, it was worse. It wouldn't move at all for like a minuteand then suddenly lurched forward with a jerk almost hitting the car in front of me.i took the car to the dealership and they told me that all 3 series manufactured between 03-03 to 11-03 have this problem and it is due to the transmission . What i don't understand is if there is a recall on that. They didn't tell me about this problem at all whereas now i read the message boards and there have been a lot of similar complaints. I wonder what my options are? i bought the car because there was a special deal on this car. May be the deal was because of this issue.

I filed a petition for a defects investigation as well as a complaint about problems with a 2004 bmw 325xi with a defective transmission, resulting in delayed engagement as well as "lurching" of the vehicle when accelerating and/or braking.vehicle went back for repair - after had slight delayed engagement again,part fell out of the steering column, loud flapping noise started in the right side of the dashboard, the transmission failure warning light has been coming on - 2300miles on it and has been out of my possession 4 weeks of the 3 months.the va office of consumer affairs has suggested pursuing the state's lemon law.the bmwboard on-line has many similar complaints and a portion of my petition (the addendum) was posted, giving the impression that bmw is voluntarily recalling the affected vehicles ... I was told that might happen, but i am not aware that it actually has happened.i have also been told that cars manufactured after december 2003 are free of the defect ... From what i have been reading on this auto safety hotline and the bmwboard, that is not true.beware.if i am the only one who has filed a petition, but you are reading this and you are having similar problems with your 3 series or x5, file a petition, too ... That's the only way to get some action from bmw ... This is a powder keg.i bought the car on dec. 15, 2003 and have had problems from day 1.this is not going away ... I have given it time; bmw has had the opportunity to correct the problem ... With a lot of input from me ... Because they have told me basically that i'm imagining things ... I'm not ... And still i have a new problem every time i get in the car.this is wrong ... Please speak up.the dealerships seem to be uniformly "pooh-poohing" the problem.that is wrong.

The bmw 325xit (automatic transmission) which i purchased on 2/5/2004 developed a problem with forward gear not engaging on a cold start. The vehicle had less than 1000 miles on it when i first noticed the problem. Typically on a morning when i back the car out of the garage, and then shift the gears from reverse to drive, the vehicle fails to move forward for 3 to 4 seconds upon releasing the brake. I would have to press down on the gas pedal and watch the engine revv to anywhere between 3-5k rpm before the gear would engage. The vehicle creeps forward until the gear fully engages.the problem has no far been rather consistent - it happens quite predictably every morning. I have not however noticed a problem with gear engagement once the car is able to start.

The contact owns a 2004 bmw 325xi. The contact stated the vehicle would not shift into drive in cold temperatures. When she was able to shift into drive and depress the accelerator pedal, there was a momentary delay and the vehicle would abnormally jerk forward before accelerating.the dealer advised that the failure was normal. The contact took the vehicle to a local repair facility for diagnostic testing but no failure codes were produced.the vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 57,000 and the current mileage was approximately 70,000.

I purchased a 2004 bmw 330xi and had two problems that surfaced immediately.when calling the dealership, they brushed off the complaint stating that the car was new and it would "settle" given time.however, after the problems continued, i brought the car into a dealership who, upon inspection, told me i simply needed some new parts.one being a transmission (which i think is more than just a part).apparently, there is a directive to bmw dealerships highlighting the problem, but to deal with it only upon customer complaint.i find this very troubling given the nature of the problem(s) and the potential safety issue should the transmission completely fail. The issues are as follows:1.after only 2,000 miles, i had put an additional 7 quarts of oil in the vehicle.apparently, the oil valve is defective and needs to be replaced.2.when first operating the vehicle, the vehicle often would not begin to move until the rpm's reached anywhere from 3-5k rpm's.in both instances, the bmw dealer stated this was due to a defective "part".the replacement of the oil filter makes sense as it is a part.the complete replacement of a transmission, however, does not. Although i did not have an accident, i believe that these issues can potentially lead to a major problem and therefore respectfully request an investigation.

The driver's side seat belt repeatedly stops when extending.it can take 10 to 15 attempts to get it to extend long enough.these failures cause drivers to "give up" and not bother to use the seat belt. I have spoken with bmw and they want $500 to replace the seat belt.i believe this is dangerous and a flaw in the design.

The driver's side seat belt does not extend from the housing.it stops repeatedly and only after several tries will it extend long enough to be latched.the situation may cause a driver to not use seat belts as this can take a long time to finally extend.i contacted the dealer and they suggest it might be a mechanical problem which they are willing to diagnose for $150 and then fix for an unknown amount. It would this is a potentially serious safety issue.there has been recalls for a similar problem in other bmws but not this model.for example, refer to nhtsa item number: 10041411 and nhtsa item number:10037487

Heated seat are melting thru leather and making burn holes .....burns legs even on low setting.

Bmw 325xi 2004, after substantial or unreasonable delay in the bmw return, was perceived to be rendered unsafe/unsatisfactory/incomplete, with airbag defects/spillover effects, or released with known defects to the vehicle that put the driver and unsuspecting occupants at risk of serious bodily injury up to death. Bmw was to send a 'consent form', then vehicle owner was to review/sign/return, bmw would then order 'interim airbag' parts, and repair. The consent form was not received or signed, june 2016, bmw enter/repair without authorization, or signed consent forms, and made unknown changes to the airbag/systems. The toxins remain has corroded it or released toxins/odor. The vehicle was on a 'cease & desist' airbag repair pending the receipt and execution of the consent form as agreed. Bmw failed to make the repairs per quote and airbag [i.e. Explosive device; sodium azide azium; shrapnel, etc.] was left in an unsafe state. The vehicle needs an inspection by nhtsa, as it is believed to be contaminated or corroded, by unknown toxins (i.e sodium azide or azium?). Persons exposed have contacted cdc/poison center who stated that persons not have further contact with bmw till inspected? see claim 10881628 for same/similar background. The owners were subjected to foreseeable toxins, from the airbag defects/recalls/ unauthorized repairs to the bmw, pending a "consent form", and has resulted in injury or medical care or poison control center consultations. The toxins had a 'sharp odor', overwhelming as reported, and exposure resulted in damages to persons or property, awaiting estimates to be completed. Importantly, exposure tosodium azide can be fatal and the vehicle needs an inspection by nhtsa or dot. If you do not inspect unsafe vehicles, with perceived safety concerns, please provide a referral or preferred source due to the serious public health and safety issues.

Vehicle defects reported or recalled, bmw, oem, or other, yet with known defects was requested to drive an unsafe vehicle that is 'imminent danger' that can cause serious injury or death: airbags. Bmw replaced driver side airbag in 9/ 2014 then passenger side. Yet in 2015 accident, the airbags failed to detonate, and injury to persons/property occurred. Bmw recalled driver's side airbag (2nd repair/3rd airbag) in 2015 and parts are on back order. Bmw has the 'defective vehicle' (i.e. Other issues engine, seat belts, etc. Remain) and provided a bmw loaner car through their affiliated partner (toyota's jv alliance) enterprise in good faith pending repair. In june 2016, a 'cease & desist' was placed on the bmw, in part, due to a federal investigation or injury (i.e. Defective airbag- explosive device~shooting shrapnel) that leaves 'driver in harm's way'. One could infer 'attempted murder' if the driver is placed behind the wheel of a defective vehicle or airbag: millions of recalls. I am a material witness and am reporting intimidation, threats, hostility, and bullying over the bmw or defective airbags. This has resulted in professional defamation, personal injury, financial distress, and sabotage in various instances (to be reported in separate package to be sent to investigator due to confidentiality). The most recent occurred around june 23, 2016 when bmw/enterprise rental car stating "grand theft" of the vehicle in their possession or awaiting a swap? simple fact that bmw stated that an 'interim fix' was approved by dots but needed signed consent forms-- was sending them to me. Bmw did not follow procedures, 'unauthorized entry, removal, destruction' of airbag with a 'cease& desist'. On 6/24/16 going to enterprise/alamo-orlando was no issue/no unpaid bill. This did not stop continuation of harassment or retaliation (e.g. Asef) unconstitutional or uncivil conduct.

Bmw 325xi 2004, after substantial or unreasonable delay in the bmw return, was perceived to be rendered unsafe/unsatisfactory/incomplete, with airbag defects/spillover effects, or released with known defects to the vehicle that put the driver and unsuspecting occupants at risk of serious bodily injury up to death. Bmw was to send a 'consent form', then vehicle owner was to review/sign/return, bmw would then order 'interim airbag' parts, and repair. The consent form was not received or signed, june 2016, bmw enter/repair without authorization, or signed consent forms, and made unknown changes to the airbag/systems. The toxins remain has corroded it or released toxins/odor. The vehicle was on a 'cease & desist' airbag repair pending the receipt and execution of the consent form as agreed. Bmw failed to make the repairs per quote and airbag [i.e. Explosive device; sodium azide azium; shrapnel, etc.] was left in an unsafe state. The vehicle needs an inspection by nhtsa, as it is believed to be contaminated or corroded, by unknown toxins (i.e sodium azide or azium?). Persons exposed have contacted cdc/poison center who stated that persons not have further contact with bmw till inspected? see claim 10881628 for same/similar background. The owners were subjected to foreseeable toxins, from the airbag defects/recalls/ unauthorized repairs to the bmw, pending a "consent form", and has resulted in injury or medical care or poison control center consultations. The toxins had a 'sharp odor', overwhelming as reported, and exposure resulted in damages to persons or property, awaiting estimates to be completed. Importantly, exposure tosodium azide can be fatal and the vehicle needs an inspection by nhtsa or dot. If you do not inspect unsafe vehicles, with perceived safety concerns, please provide a referral or preferred source due to the serious public health and safety issues.

Bmw jointly owned vehicle, was not returned to customers on demand, nor swapped as is customary business practice (i.e. Bmw repair/recalled for bmw loaner car), and held for unreasonable amount of time. Bmw recalled the vehicle, in part,defective airbags, and was to send a consent form to the customers prior to ordering parts/repairs. The customers never received the consent form as assured and expressed concerns about the bmw who damaged the vehicle in their possession or disabled state. July 15, 2016 bmwflatbed delivered with unidentified chemicals/toxins that resulted in front end physical damages and/or toxins in bmw that resulted in "poison exposure", toxology tests pending. The toxins maybe airbag chemicals, sodium azide, hydrazoic acid, or others,and need bmw tested. Please inform on who specifically performs these tests or agency that does quickly due to the toxic nature. Bmw had a duty to disclose these facts to customers, insurance, government, and others. 49 usc safety act 30101.dot states 'loaner vehicle' is customary practice in airbag recall, an obligation oem dealership, thus request the process in securing the loaner vehicle or reinstatement. Bmw by affiliates, unilaterally took bmw loaner without providing a repaired bmw, unfair exchange, and was returned in a disabled status. 'but for' wrecked/recalled defective bmw, a loaner would not have been required, safety act, 49 usc 30101. Please respond in writing, the process to (1) secure chemical tests; (2)vehicle safety review or decontamination, and (3) loaner car approval process for insurance. Nhtsa safety act, 49 usc 30101 delegated by secretary of transportation, 49 cfr 1.95, inspect/investigate 30166(b)(1); civil penalties30165(b); ensure recalled 30118-119; adequacy of recalls 49 usc 30120(c)(1), accelerate remedy programs 30120(c)(3);and other 49 usc 30166(g): bmw loaner

My 2004 bmw 325xi sedan was about to carefully back into a service bay from just outside the garage door. Aware of the need for precision and care (there were people and items near the bay), i shifted into reverse, then very gently stepped on the accelerator pedal. There was a momentary hesitation, then the car began to go backward slowly for about a half second and then, without any action on my part, the engine suddenly roared to life and the car went backwards at tremendous speed. Within about two seconds it had gone back some 40+ feet and, because i had turned the wheel a bit before moving the car, the rear pivoted almost 90 degrees and ran into a garage side wall another 40 or so feet away. An employee may have been brushedas the car hit the wall near him. The event happened so quickly and unexpectedly that i had no time to even step on the brake. I am a skilled driver and at no time did i step hard on the accelerator pedal. Major damage to trunk, rear panel and two doors occurred.in my ca 50 years of driving i have had only one previous accident. That was in february 2007 when, as i shifted into reverse in an icy parking lot, a gentle push on the accelerator resulted in a sudden racing of the engine and resulted in very rapid backward rush of the car. It hit a brick wallbehind it and resulted in major rear end damage. It was the very same car as in the 2009 accident described above. The 2007 event was attributed to ice on the pavement and not further investigated. The car was then fully repaired by bmw in rochester ny.

The vehicle (1.6 turbo) has a hesitancy to engage in acceleration relative to pressing the accelerator pedal. Once engaged, it immediately jumps out to a quick, jolting and what feels like an uncontrollable start. This typically happens at stop/start intersections where the car comes to a full and complete stop. Yesterday, (07.20.16) the vehicle choked and sputtered and almost stalled on a small rise when traffic started moving through a just-turned green light at a very busy intersection during rush hour. The tachometer winds out in a manner disproportionate to the speedometer reading. This does not mimic the effects of a turbo lag. Rather, it feels like the vehicle isn't getting a timely delivery of gas to the engine firing mechanisms (we would liken it to a dirty fuel line or a clogged carburetor on older cars), or the dual clutch system is debating whether or not to get in gear when demanded, or whatever device that interprets driver commands (pedal pushing) to engine performance isn't responding efficiently. The car has had one shop visit for this issue and the dealer (werner hyundai, tallahassee) stated they 'reset the software." i will be taking the car back to the dealer the week of july 25, 2016. Unfortunately, i anticipate this issue will lead to a wreck, most likely from 1) being hit from behind as the car tries to figure out whether or not to accelerate, or 2) being t-boned at an intersection because the car won't accelerate through a rush-hour yellow light, or 3) being t-boned because my car launched (literally) out into oncoming traffic (that initially was at a safe distance away) once it got past the choke/sputter/stall point....updated 08/01/16




Read more




© 2025 All rights reserved