We found the following complaints for NANJING KUMHO TIRE CO ROAD VENTURE AT - KL78 (Unknown)
Read complaints for NANJING KUMHO TIRE CO ROAD VENTURE AT - KL78 (Unknown)
I had 2 failures with the first about 9/21/07 and the second 10/6/07.the vehicle is a 1991 f250 hd and is occasionally used to haul a slide-in camper.on both occasions i had the camper on the truck, loading the truck to near the rated capacity of the tires but not over to my knowledge.in both instances the tire pressure was checked before leaving the house, were we traveling a moderate speed, about 55 mph, and it was cool.in both cases i noticed a vibration but before i could effect a substantial response the tire exploded.the truck remained in control but there was substantial damage to the truck.the tires were on the rear so there was damage to both sides.the first time i had the tire replaced by the dealer and he gave me over a 50% credit, reflecting the amount of tread left on the tire.the second time i had the tire replaced with a different brand and kept the old tire for inspection.
Iown 265/75r16 kumho road venture at 10 ply load range e tires that at least one has started to blister on the sidewall near the bead of the tire, only 20,000 miles on tires which wereregularly rotated,and haven't hit anything with them.there was a recall of the same tire for the same problem) by kumho manufactured between january 2005 and deceember2006.the potential for blowout was the reason for the recall.i purchased the tires in june 2004 and have the same problem.have the recall inclusion dates been expanded.
I had 2 failures with the first about 9/21/07 and the second 10/6/07.the vehicle is a 1991 f250 hd and is occasionally used to haul a slide-in camper.on both occasions i had the camper on the truck, loading the truck to near the rated capacity of the tires but not over to my knowledge.in both instances the tire pressure was checked before leaving the house, were we traveling a moderate speed, about 55 mph, and it was cool.in both cases i noticed a vibration but before i could effect a substantial response the tire exploded.the truck remained in control but there was substantial damage to the truck.the tires were on the rear so there was damage to both sides.the first time i had the tire replaced by the dealer and he gave me over a 50% credit, reflecting the amount of tread left on the tire.the second time i had the tire replaced with a different brand and kept the old tire for inspection.
The contact owns a 1999 dodge ram 2500.the vehicle has kumho venture, size lt245/75r16 tires (na).while driving 65 mph, the contact heard a loud pounding noise coming from the front of the vehicle.the consumer stated the vehicle was hard to control but was able to bring truck to a stop. The tread separated on the front driver side tire.as of september 7, 2007, the dealer had not inspected the tires.the failure and current mileages were 40,000.*updated 12/12/07 updated 12/12/07
Read more
