We found the following complaints for HK S400 (Unknown)
Read complaints for HK S400 (Unknown)
The contact owns a 2004 keystone outback rv. The tire brand is duro, hwa-fong rubber industrial company ltd is the manufacturer. The tire size was t115/70d15.25rss is the model number. The rv doesn't have a motor. The contact observed that the tread is separating on all 4 of his tires, the front passenger and driver and therear driver andpassenger tires.the estimated cost to replace them is $300 per tire. These are the original tires when the rv was purchased. The dealer advised the owner to speak with the tire manufacturer.the manufacturer advised him to email photos of the tires and they would compensate him for half of the cost. The contact wants the manufacturer to reimburse him for 4 new tires, including the spare. The current approximate tire mileage was 850 and the failure mileage was 450.updated 10.09.07.
Purchased this vehiclein 10/05 and have been very pleased with until recently.got a card in the mail for a free 34 point inspection from the dealership, and decided on april 5, 2007 to use it. During inspection nothing was brought to my attention.then this week onmay 8, 2007 the check engine"light came on.took vehicle back to dealer for check.i was advised that some valve was bad and they replaced it, butby the way, you need 4 new tires and an alignment right away. Recently while driving in the rain i had noticed that the vehicle was all over the place, hydroplaning.i felt very unsafe and glanced at my tires.strange enough, all 4 tires were evenly worn outand near completely bald.did i mention that i only had 27,000 miles on them ,and i havenot been anywhere but regular streets. But not being the tire expert i took the dealership at their word and assumed all was well.so, a bit annoyed on may 8,2007i decided to look up my warranty paperwork.how ironic!there were two pamphlets for tires in my little handy little hyundai owner's pack.one for these great 60,000 mile good year tires,,and then the other for the hankook, kumho tires that just happened to have only a 24,000 mile warranty, and happened to be the ones that had apparently been put on my car.so, not only losing a customer to a sneaky bait and switch tactic during the sale of the lx model tucson, the dealership and the tire maker put my safety at risk and tried to blame it on a poor alignment.i may be a woman, and one that didn't know a lot about cars, but i did know that if a vehicle was out of alignment all fours tiresweren't worn evenly and completely bald after an inspection that took place just a month prior, yet wasn't mentioned .i wasstill pleased with tuscon, but very angry with dealership tactics.
I bought a new 2007 ford focus and it is four months old with 20,000 miles on it. The tires are bald with different patterns. The tire that concerns me the most is the one that has a wave like pattern on it. The dealer said its normal wear and tear but all the people including mechanics i showed it too before i went to ford said they had never seen anything like it before. I am concerned that there is a major defect that could seriously injure someone.
Read more