Enter VIN number
Get the most accurate report for the vehicle. Basic information is FREE
Use this form now and GET 20% DISCOUNT for CarVertical reports!




We found the following complaints for HANKOOK VENTUS S1 NOBLE 2 (Unknown)

Read complaints for HANKOOK VENTUS S1 NOBLE 2 (Unknown)


2018 volkswagen gti s.was actually leaving my house on the way to the dealer for an unrelated issue. As i was leaving my house, driving at like 10-15 mph on my street. My tpms light comes on saying i have low pressure. I stop immediately to check to see. My rear driver tire had a huge sidewall bulge and you could see the bead sitting on the rim lip. This was within less the 400 miles of the vehicle being on the road. I had not hit any potholes or anything just smooth pavement went it happened(or ever). I put the spare and continued to the dealer. It was replaced with a new tire. But i feel this tire brand is a safety concern. I have the same tires on my 2017 ford explorer and they are already worn down at 15000 miles. Hankook ventus tires are garbage and def a safety concern.

We purchased a new 2016 ford explorer sport 4wd 4dr in 2016. The oe tires on the vehicle were 4 hancook ventus s1 nobel 2 tires, sized 255/50r20. The dot rating is "5mnc 1a h". At 13,369 miles all 4 tires were replace under "warranty". The front tire treads were "flacking/peeling" . The work was done by mathews-currie ford, 130 tamiami trial north, nokomis fl 34275, on 5/10/17, ro # 6199123/1. Our cost for the tires was $419.62. We were forced by hancook to replace "like with like". At 23,101 miles i took the vehicle back to the same dealer to have the oil changed. The replacement tires are again "flacking/peeling." the dealer tells me that we will have to replace them with the same tires. They also tell me that this a reoccurring problem with this brand of tires.my background is that of an executive in the oe and aftermarket automotive and heavy truck industry. My employers manufactured foundation brakes, brake chambers and ride control. I know an unsafe situation when i see one and this one is not safe. I was involved in a major safety recall on ride control and know what it can cost a company to not recognize what their potential liability can be. I am not comfortable for the safety of myself and my family with hancook tires. My request is that someone from your legal staff contact ford's legal department and warn them about the future liability being created for them by one of their suppliers.

I took my car in for a oil change and my dealer called to inform me i needed to replace all my tires as the treads were all in the unsafe area.the tires are: hankook ventus s1 nobel 2 size 255/50r20 dot 5mnc 1a h 1316 these tires have 23,000 miles on them and came oem on 2017 ford explorer. The tire tread is gone. Premature wear. Please investigate as others are reporting the same exact problem on the same vehicle.see ford bulliton ssm 46905

2017 ford explorer sport with hankook 255/50r20 105h ventus s1 noble 2 tires are chipping/cutting and wearing prematurely.vehicle only has 12,500 miles.

Hankook ventus s1 nobel 2 size 255/50r20 dot 5mnc 1a h 1216 these tires have 12,200 miles on them and came oem on 2017 ford explorer.the tire tread is peeling and shredding.premature wear.please investigate as others are reporting the same exact problem on the same vehicle.

The contact owns a 2017 mercedes benz metris equipped with hankook tires, tireline ventus s1 noble 2, tire size 225/55/r17, dot # 5mkc1ah0316.. The contact stated that the tires were just rotated and was driving at 75 mph and the frontdriver's side tireblew out frominside outward. The contact pulled over along the left side median lane on the highway. The contact then had to pull over the right side of the highway with the assistance of her towing service. The damaged tire was replaced on the side of the road and then the contact took the tire to the vehicle dealer rbm of atlanta 7640 roswell rd, atlanta, ga 30350 (770) 390-0700 who confirmed it was tire malfunction not from hitting a foreign object. The contact had all four tires replaced by the dealer. The tire dealer manufacturer was called by the contact and had pictures of the damaged tire sent to them. The contact currently had all four hankook tires in her possession. The tire failure mileageand the vehicle failure mileage was22,000. *dt*dt

The contact owns a 2017 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 h452 tires, size: 255/50r20. The contact stated that chunks and pieces of the rubber detached from the tires. The vehicle was taken to superior ford (4303 la-19, zachary, la 70791, 225-654-2611) where it was determined that the tire manufacturer would only cover sixty percent of the tire replacement after 12,000 miles. The vehicle manufacturer was made aware of the failure and offered no assistance. The tires were not replaced. The tire and vehicle failure mileage was 12,200.

Hankook tires, ventus s1 noble 2 splitting outside sidewall, caused to depressure tire, which caused to crack tire on the inner sidewall subsequently led to manufacturer claim blame on my vehicle. The tire model is under a recall, but in different size, but identical walls, manufacturing process. My vehicle's tire size 235/40/r18. Recalled:ventus s1 noble2 '245/45r18 96w', '245/40r19 94w', '275/35r19 96wproper tire pressure was maintained and checked weekly for 3years, since the vehicle was purchased.

On june 3, 2017, i had a warning lite for low air pressure emit on my dashboard. I pulled over to the next service station and applied air to my tire. Only until then did i notice the severe cracking and rotting of these tires these tires hankook ventous s1 were purchased on april 1, 2016 and have less than 10k miles on them. In fact, after further review the dry rot and cracking is experienced on all 4 tires causing severe separation of the tread from the tire itself.

Complete disintegration ofof a hanook ventus s1 noblewhile traveling at approximately 30 mph.tire did not hit any obstacles, nor was the tire. Under or over inflated.driven 17,000 miles before failure

The contact owns a 2015 hyundai genesis equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v864000 (tires); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was notified of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. The tire size and dot number were unknown.

The contact owns a 2018 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/50r20. The contact stated that the front driver and passenger side tire thread were prematurely worn. The contact had the tires rotated and also noticed that the rear driver and passenger tires also had loose thread and cracks. The tires were not replaced. The manufacturer was contacted. The approximate tire and vehicle failure mileage was 16,000.

The contact owns a 2018 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires. Size: 255/50r20 105h, dot number: 5mnc 1ah 1218. Upon inspection, it was discovered that the 2 rear tires were prematurely worn out or will get a rejected sticker if not replaced. Owner went to baystate ford dealer in easton ma where the failure was confirmed, but the cause of the failure was not determined. The contact was told by this dealer service that neither they or the manufacturer would offer any assistance for this failure.

Manufacturer: ford motor company , hankook tire america corp.vehicle identification no. (vin): [xxx]summary:purchased 2017 ford explorer october 2017 with original hankook ventus s1 noble2 255/50r20 105h tires. Have 28,000 miles and have been rotated at each oil change; have been experiencing low air pressure readings, extreme treadwear and 1ea tire failure (separation (while in motion)). ...this is another dangerous issue similar to the firestone disaster.information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).

Hankook ventus s1 noble 2 (255/50r20 105h) tires have excessive treadwear (less than 2/32 minimum) and cuts in tread.hankook tires have 28k miles, are original to 2018 explorer purchased new.vehicle and tires are serviced and maintained via premium maintenance plan.vehicle is aligned.low tread and cuts are preventing dealers/others from fixing flat caused by nail puncture.at least 2 tires have excessive wear and cuts.

All 4 original hankook tires provided on my 2016 ford explorer are shredding and treads are delaminating at 16,000 miles and 14 months of use. There are currently 14 other complaints about this issue under 2016 ford explorer complaints, but those people did not list them under the tires complaint portion of this website! please look into this issue, as it is clearly nationwide and reminiscent of the firestone ford explorer issues!

All 4 hanook tires dot # 5mnc 1a h (0216)255/50/r20 treads have been chipping resulting in unsafe conditions and excessive wear.tires completely worn out at 23,000 miles.manufacturer is aware if this resulting from new compounds (materials) used in manufacturing.high speed blowouts have been reported for this particular tire yet no recall has been issued for this tire despite its defects and safety concerns. I first notice it on two front tires just prior vehicle was taken in for annual service may 2017.

The contact owns a 2016 ford explorer equipped with hankook tires, tire line: ventus s1 noble 2, tire size: 255/50/r20, dot number: 5mnc 1a h 0716. The contact became aware of tread separation on all four tires. The contact stated that the failure was more severe on the two front tires. The vehicle was not taken to have the tires replaced. The contact also stated that the tires failed to maintain the proper tire pressure. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 16,132.

The contact owns a 2019 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus 105h tires, size: 255/50/r20. The contact stated that the original front passenger side tire had to be replaced because the tire pressure was consistently due to a three inch cut approximately two inches from the rim. Sunset ford (11700 gravois rd, st. Louis, mo 63127, (314) 843-4431) tried to sell the contact a new tire after informing him that the tire was not covered by the warranty. The contact went to a tire shop for a second opinion and was informed that there was a defect with the tire. The tire manufacturer was not contacted. The vehicle failure mileage was 2,000. The tire failure mileage was unknown.

The contact owns a 2015 hyundai genesis equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 245/45r18. The contact received notification of nhtsa campaign number: 15v864000 (tires); however, the parts to do the repair were unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The contact called autonation chrysler dodge jeep ram brunswick (5400 altama ave, brunswick, ga 31525 (912) 231-4453) where it was confirmed that the parts were not available for the recall remedy. The manufacturer was notified of the issue and stated that they would call the contact back; however, the contact did not receive a response in ten weeks. The contact had not experienced a failure. Parts distribution disconnect.

Purchased 2017 ford explorer february 2017 with original hankook ventus s1 noble2 255/50r20 105h tires. Have 20,000 miles and have been rotated at each oil change; have been experiencing low air pressure readings, chipping on tires, and extreme treadwear. Dealer suggested to contact hankook directly because others have experienced similar issues. Many attempts to contact hankook customer service have not been successful...this is another dangerous issue similar to the firestone disaster.

The side wall of my hankook 255/50 r /20 ventus s1 noble 2 tire blew out.i have a 2" hole in the side wall of the tire.i was at a stopsign on a city street, and just started moving when the side wall blew out.it sounded like a large balloon explosion and the tire went flat instantly.some hankook tires have been recalledbut the local ford dealer told me not this one.these hankook tires should be recalled.

While parked we noticed the tires on our 2016 ford explorer are shredding. All 4 tires are shredding, literally falling apart

2018 ford explorer. Hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires. Size 255/50 r20 105hno crash. Mileage !2,066 miles. Tires are cracking and separating with chunks flying off as i drive. Ford offered me $500 towards replacing the 4 tires for the same brand. They would not replace it with a different brand that i feel safe with.i will be running into the same issues. These tires need to be recalled!

Tires on 2015 hyundai sonata sport. At 9000 mi. During scheduled routine maintenance at the dealership, i was informed that the tires could not be rotated due to a blister in the side wall of one of the tires. I replaced this tire with a new one of same make and model. At approximately 21,000 mi. I was again informed (during routine maintenance) that the tires could not be rotated due to a blister in the side wall of one of the tires. In 43 years of driving, i've never experienced a tire developing a blister in the side wall...until now. Two tires in 14 months. I believe that these tires are defective. Hancook ventus s1 noble2 - dot 17n9 1a h-2514, 235/45r18 - 94v this vehicle was purchased new in march, 2015 and is equipped with tire pressure monitoring system monitoring. The dealership services my vehicle every 3 to 5 thousand miles. They always inflated the tires to 32 psi. Vehicle placard recommends 34 psi. The tire itself reads 51 psi max. After the second 'blister' incident, i increased the tire pressure to 40 psi. No issues with tires since.

Hankook ventus s1 noble2 (excluded from recall) are wearing extraordinary fast and the rubber is starting to pull apart, flake away. Chucks of rubber are coming off of the tire and leaving holes that appear to be about 1/4 inch deep . This will be our second set of tires with the same issue and the vehicle has only 40,000 miles.

The contact owns a 2016 ford explorer equip with hankook ventus s1 noble 2; tire size: 255/50r20-108h and the dot number: 5mnc 1a h0118. The contact stated that while inspecting the tires, it was discovered that the tires had experienced cracking and gudges on the inside and outside of the tires. The failure was present on all four tires. The contact also indicated that while driving at various speeds, the vehicle would shake and vibrate. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer autonation ford located at 7700 blanding blvd, jacksonville, fl 32244 who replaced all four tires with the same brand size and model tires but approximately 13,000 miles later the same failure had occurred. The contact was unable to reach out to the manufacturer in reference to the failures. The vehicle failure mileage was 18,000 and the failure tire mileage was not available. The vin was not available.

The contact owns a 2017 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/50/r20/105h. The contact noticed that the inner and outer areas of the two front tires were worn. The contact drove to performance ford lincoln bountiful (1800 s main st, bountiful, ut 84010, (888) 476-8961), but the tires were not diagnosed or replaced. The manufacturer was not contacted. The vehicle and tire failure mileage was 16,381.

Hankook tires show premature wear on all 4 tires. 255/50r20 105h are worn 60-65% at 17,600 miles on vehicle (15 months old).tires were rotated every 5,500 miles.

Vehicle vibration at 60 mph. Service department did installed "road analyzer" and performed "nvh diagnostics". All tires balanced within 1/4 oz, found two rear tires with 5015 miles on vehicle to have road road force of 18-20 lbs on each of the rear tires. Diagnosis replace tires!

The contact owns a 2017 hyundai elantra equipped with hankook tires, tire line: venus s1 noble 2, tire size: 225/40/r18 n/a with a speed rating of 88w, dot #: 5mrl1ah4716. The contact stated that while turning into a driveway at 15 mph, the driver's side front tire experienced a blowout. In addition, the contact stated that all three of the vehicle's tires with the exception of the passenger side rear tire, experienced severe cracking and peeling around the sidewalls. Cns car company (812 washington st, waterloo, iowa 50702 (319-291-7321)) was contacted regarding the failure and scheduled the contact an appointment to inspect and replaced the driver's side front tire. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated that there was no warranty coverage. The failure mileage of the oem equipment was initially 4,500. The failure mileage on the driver's side front tire and vehicle was approximately 18,000.

Oem hankook tires on 2017 ford explorer: with less than 15,000 miles on my 2017 explorer, it began to hydroplane at much lower speeds than when new. The tires are oem, hankook, ventus s1 noble.i took the car to fugate ford, who said they recently processed two other vehicles with bad hankook tires. On closer inspection with doug at fugate, you could see the tire tread was ripping away from itself all the way around the tire.fugate took pictures and phoned hankook. Fugate called me to say that because the tires had 6/32 tread remaining, they would not process the claim. Hankook needed the tread wear to be 4/32 or less.in my view, that's ridiculous... These hankook tires are defective and unsafe, whether at 6/32 or 4/32.today, i had all four defective tires replaced.

The contact owns a 2018 ford explorer equipped hankook tires, tire line: ventus s1 noble2, tire size: 255/50/r20, dot number: 5117. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken for routine service at koeppel ford (57-15 northern blvd, queens, ny 11377), and the contact was informed that all four tires needed to be replaced due to accelerated tread separation. The contact mention that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the vehicle hydroplaned due to the tires. The tires were not replaced. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and informed the contact that the tires would be prorated to defray some of the cost for the tire replacement. The contact was referred to the dealer for assistance. The failure mileage of the vehicle and tires were approximately 24,459. *ln

I purchased a 2017 ford explorer xlt and after 20,000 miles i was told the tires needed to be replaced. I agree with the service man and am looking to replace them. I looked at the tires, hankook, venous s1noble 2, 255/50r20 105h and saw the dot date was 002881, 2012.. If i'm reading this correct the tires were five years old upon buying the vehicle and they are now seven years old with 20,000 miles on them. I believe they are unsafe and were probable unsafe when i bought the vehicle

2018 volkswagen gti s.was actually leaving my house on the way to the dealer for an unrelated issue. As i was leaving my house, driving at like 10-15 mph on my street. My tpms light comes on saying i have low pressure. I stop immediately to check to see. My rear driver tire had a huge sidewall bulge and you could see the bead sitting on the rim lip. This was within less the 400 miles of the vehicle being on the road. I had not hit any potholes or anything just smooth pavement went it happened(or ever). I put the spare and continued to the dealer. It was replaced with a new tire. But i feel this tire brand is a safety concern. I have the same tires on my 2017 ford explorer and they are already worn down at 15000 miles. Hankook ventus tires are garbage and def a safety concern.

The contact owns a 2014 ford taurus equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/45zr19104w (na). While driving various speeds, the vehicle inadvertently pulled to the right. The contact stated that the low tire pressure warning indicator illuminated. The vehicle was taken to two rivers ford (76 belinda pkwy, mt juliet, tn 37122, (800) 900-1000) where an alignment was performed, but no failure with the tires could be detected. Air was added to the tires as a precaution. The contact stated that the low tire pressure indicator would periodically illuminate. The manufacturer was not notified. The vehicle and tire failure mileages were unknown.

Tires on 2015 hyundai sonata sport. At 9000 mi. During scheduled routine maintenance at the dealership, i was informed that the tires could not be rotated due to a blister in the side wall of one of the tires. I replaced this tire with a new one of same make and model. At approximately 21,000 mi. I was again informed (during routine maintenance) that the tires could not be rotated due to a blister in the side wall of one of the tires. In 43 years of driving, i've never experienced a tire developing a blister in the side wall...until now. Two tires in 14 months. I believe that these tires are defective. Hancook ventus s1 noble2 - dot 17n9 1a h-2514, 235/45r18 - 94v this vehicle was purchased new in march, 2015 and is equipped with tire pressure monitoring system monitoring. The dealership services my vehicle every 3 to 5 thousand miles. They always inflated the tires to 32 psi. Vehicle placard recommends 34 psi. The tire itself reads 51 psi max. After the second 'blister' incident, i increased the tire pressure to 40 psi. No issues with tires since.

2018 volkswagen gti s.was actually leaving my house on the way to the dealer for an unrelated issue. As i was leaving my house, driving at like 10-15 mph on my street. My tpms light comes on saying i have low pressure. I stop immediately to check to see. My rear driver tire had a huge sidewall bulge and you could see the bead sitting on the rim lip. This was within less the 400 miles of the vehicle being on the road. I had not hit any potholes or anything just smooth pavement went it happened(or ever). I put the spare and continued to the dealer. It was replaced with a new tire. But i feel this tire brand is a safety concern. I have the same tires on my 2017 ford explorer and they are already worn down at 15000 miles. Hankook ventus tires are garbage and def a safety concern.

Hankook tires, ventus s1 noble 2 splitting outside sidewall, caused to depressure tire, which caused to crack tire on the inner sidewall subsequently led to manufacturer claim blame on my vehicle. The tire model is under a recall, but in different size, but identical walls, manufacturing process. My vehicle's tire size 235/40/r18. Recalled:ventus s1 noble2 '245/45r18 96w', '245/40r19 94w', '275/35r19 96wproper tire pressure was maintained and checked weekly for 3years, since the vehicle was purchased.

Complete disintegration ofof a hanook ventus s1 noblewhile traveling at approximately 30 mph.tire did not hit any obstacles, nor was the tire. Under or over inflated.driven 17,000 miles before failure

The contact owns a 2013 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/50r20. While the contact was washing the vehicle, she noticed that both front tires were shredding. The contact took the vehicle to an independent mechanic who stated that the tires would worsen over time before needing to be replaced. The tires were not replaced. The tires were replacement tires. The manufacturer was not notified. The tire and vehicle failure mileages were unknown.

The contact owns a 2017 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/50r20. The contact stated that all four tires experienced peeling and tread chipping. The vehicle was taken to the dealer (autonation ford, 1400 interstate 20, arlington tx), but the cause of the failure could not be determined. The manufacturer was notified and did not assist. The tire and vehicle failure mileage was 24,000. The vin was not available.

The contact owns a 2016 ford explorer equipped with hankook tires, tire line: ventus s1 noble 2, tire size: 255/50/r20, dot number: 5mnc 1a h 0716. The contact became aware of tread separation on all four tires. The contact stated that the failure was more severe on the two front tires. The vehicle was not taken to have the tires replaced. The contact also stated that the tires failed to maintain the proper tire pressure. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 16,132.

The contact owns a 2016 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/50/r20 (na). While the vehicle was parked, the contact became aware of chunks of tire missing from the tire. The vehicle was taken to a tire facility to be inspected. The contact was not given a cause for the tire failure. The manufacturer was contacted and made aware of the failure. The approximate tire and vehicle failure mileage was 16,000.

The contact owns a 2018 ford explorer equipped with hankook tires, tire line: ventus s1 noble, tire size: 255/50/r20, dot number: 5mnc1ah3917. The contact stated that while driving at various speeds, there was an abnormal vibration in the vehicle due to cupping of the tires. The contact stated that the driver's side front tire had experienced tread separation. The cause of the failure was not determined. The local dealer huntley ford located at 13900 auto mall dr, huntly, il 60142 and the manufacturer were notified of the failure but offered no assistance. The failure mileage was 24,000. The vin was not available.

Tl the contact owns a 2017 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/50r20. The contact noticed that the tire tread was separated on three tires. The vehicle was taken to crossroads ford of kernersville, inc (1330 nc-66, kernersville, nc 27284, 877-331-8058) where it was diagnosed that the tires had fractured. The tires were replaced. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate tire and vehicle failure mileage was 28,000. The dot number is 5mnc1ah2416 for the three tires.

The contact owns a 2016 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/50r20. Upon inspection, the contact discovered that the tread was separating and shedding on all four tires. The contact stated that the failure was more prevalent on the two front tires. The cause of the failure was not determined. The manufacturer was not notified. The local dealer (mossy ford, 4570 mission bay dr, san diego, ca) was notified of the failure. The tire and vehicle failure mileages were unknown. The vin was unknown.

Hankook ventus s1 nobel 2 size 255/50r20 dot 5mnc 1a h 1216 these tires have 12,200 miles on them and came oem on 2017 ford explorer.the tire tread is peeling and shredding.premature wear.please investigate as others are reporting the same exact problem on the same vehicle.

While parked we noticed the tires on our 2016 ford explorer are shredding. All 4 tires are shredding, literally falling apart

The contact owns a 2017 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 tires, size: 255v/50r/20-105h. Upon inspection, it was discovered that pieces of the rubber tread had separated from the tire on both the front driver and passenger sides. The cause of the failure was not determined. The manufacturer was not notified. Veterans ford (7201 linebaugh ave, tampa, fl) was informed of the failure. The dot number and vin were unknown. The tire and vehicle failure mileage was 21,000.

The contact owns a 2017 ford explorer equipped with hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires, size: 255/50r20. The contact stated that all four tires were rotated and it was observed that the tread on the driver's side tire was missing chunks of rubber. The contact had an unknown ford dealer contact the tire manufacturer on his behalf. The manufacturer informed the dealer that the vehicle had 40,000 miles, which exceeded the warranty coverage. The tires were included in nhtsa campaign number: 15t024000 (tires). The tire manufacturer had not responded back to the contact directly. The tire and vehicle failure mileage was 20,000.

2018 ford explorer. Hankook ventus s1 noble 2 tires. Size 255/50 r20 105hno crash. Mileage !2,066 miles. Tires are cracking and separating with chunks flying off as i drive. Ford offered me $500 towards replacing the 4 tires for the same brand. They would not replace it with a different brand that i feel safe with.i will be running into the same issues. These tires need to be recalled!

We purchased a new 2016 ford explorer sport 4wd 4dr in 2016. The oe tires on the vehicle were 4 hancook ventus s1 nobel 2 tires, sized 255/50r20. The dot rating is "5mnc 1a h". At 13,369 miles all 4 tires were replace under "warranty". The front tire treads were "flacking/peeling" . The work was done by mathews-currie ford, 130 tamiami trial north, nokomis fl 34275, on 5/10/17, ro # 6199123/1. Our cost for the tires was $419.62. We were forced by hancook to replace "like with like". At 23,101 miles i took the vehicle back to the same dealer to have the oil changed. The replacement tires are again "flacking/peeling." the dealer tells me that we will have to replace them with the same tires. They also tell me that this a reoccurring problem with this brand of tires.my background is that of an executive in the oe and aftermarket automotive and heavy truck industry. My employers manufactured foundation brakes, brake chambers and ride control. I know an unsafe situation when i see one and this one is not safe. I was involved in a major safety recall on ride control and know what it can cost a company to not recognize what their potential liability can be. I am not comfortable for the safety of myself and my family with hancook tires. My request is that someone from your legal staff contact ford's legal department and warn them about the future liability being created for them by one of their suppliers.

Manufacturer: ford motor company , hankook tire america corp.vehicle identification no. (vin): [xxx]summary:purchased 2017 ford explorer october 2017 with original hankook ventus s1 noble2 255/50r20 105h tires. Have 28,000 miles and have been rotated at each oil change; have been experiencing low air pressure readings, extreme treadwear and 1ea tire failure (separation (while in motion)). ...this is another dangerous issue similar to the firestone disaster.information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).

Hankook tires show premature wear on all 4 tires. 255/50r20 105h are worn 60-65% at 17,600 miles on vehicle (15 months old).tires were rotated every 5,500 miles.

The contact owns a 2017 mercedes benz metris equipped with hankook tires, tireline ventus s1 noble 2, tire size 225/55/r17, dot # 5mkc1ah0316.. The contact stated that the tires were just rotated and was driving at 75 mph and the frontdriver's side tireblew out frominside outward. The contact pulled over along the left side median lane on the highway. The contact then had to pull over the right side of the highway with the assistance of her towing service. The damaged tire was replaced on the side of the road and then the contact took the tire to the vehicle dealer rbm of atlanta 7640 roswell rd, atlanta, ga 30350 (770) 390-0700 who confirmed it was tire malfunction not from hitting a foreign object. The contact had all four tires replaced by the dealer. The tire dealer manufacturer was called by the contact and had pictures of the damaged tire sent to them. The contact currently had all four hankook tires in her possession. The tire failure mileageand the vehicle failure mileage was22,000. *dt*dt

Oem hankook tires on 2017 ford explorer: with less than 15,000 miles on my 2017 explorer, it began to hydroplane at much lower speeds than when new. The tires are oem, hankook, ventus s1 noble.i took the car to fugate ford, who said they recently processed two other vehicles with bad hankook tires. On closer inspection with doug at fugate, you could see the tire tread was ripping away from itself all the way around the tire.fugate took pictures and phoned hankook. Fugate called me to say that because the tires had 6/32 tread remaining, they would not process the claim. Hankook needed the tread wear to be 4/32 or less.in my view, that's ridiculous... These hankook tires are defective and unsafe, whether at 6/32 or 4/32.today, i had all four defective tires replaced.

All 4 hanook tires dot # 5mnc 1a h (0216)255/50/r20 treads have been chipping resulting in unsafe conditions and excessive wear.tires completely worn out at 23,000 miles.manufacturer is aware if this resulting from new compounds (materials) used in manufacturing.high speed blowouts have been reported for this particular tire yet no recall has been issued for this tire despite its defects and safety concerns. I first notice it on two front tires just prior vehicle was taken in for annual service may 2017.

2018 volkswagen gti s.was actually leaving my house on the way to the dealer for an unrelated issue. As i was leaving my house, driving at like 10-15 mph on my street. My tpms light comes on saying i have low pressure. I stop immediately to check to see. My rear driver tire had a huge sidewall bulge and you could see the bead sitting on the rim lip. This was within less the 400 miles of the vehicle being on the road. I had not hit any potholes or anything just smooth pavement went it happened(or ever). I put the spare and continued to the dealer. It was replaced with a new tire. But i feel this tire brand is a safety concern. I have the same tires on my 2017 ford explorer and they are already worn down at 15000 miles. Hankook ventus tires are garbage and def a safety concern.

2017 ford explorer sport with hankook 255/50r20 105h ventus s1 noble 2 tires are chipping/cutting and wearing prematurely.vehicle only has 12,500 miles.

Purchased 2017 ford explorer february 2017 with original hankook ventus s1 noble2 255/50r20 105h tires. Have 20,000 miles and have been rotated at each oil change; have been experiencing low air pressure readings, chipping on tires, and extreme treadwear. Dealer suggested to contact hankook directly because others have experienced similar issues. Many attempts to contact hankook customer service have not been successful...this is another dangerous issue similar to the firestone disaster.

The side wall of my hankook 255/50 r /20 ventus s1 noble 2 tire blew out.i have a 2" hole in the side wall of the tire.i was at a stopsign on a city street, and just started moving when the side wall blew out.it sounded like a large balloon explosion and the tire went flat instantly.some hankook tires have been recalledbut the local ford dealer told me not this one.these hankook tires should be recalled.

I purchased a 2017 ford explorer xlt and after 20,000 miles i was told the tires needed to be replaced. I agree with the service man and am looking to replace them. I looked at the tires, hankook, venous s1noble 2, 255/50r20 105h and saw the dot date was 002881, 2012.. If i'm reading this correct the tires were five years old upon buying the vehicle and they are now seven years old with 20,000 miles on them. I believe they are unsafe and were probable unsafe when i bought the vehicle

The contact owns a 2017 hyundai elantra equipped with hankook tires, tire line: venus s1 noble 2, tire size: 225/40/r18 n/a with a speed rating of 88w, dot #: 5mrl1ah4716. The contact stated that while turning into a driveway at 15 mph, the driver's side front tire experienced a blowout. In addition, the contact stated that all three of the vehicle's tires with the exception of the passenger side rear tire, experienced severe cracking and peeling around the sidewalls. Cns car company (812 washington st, waterloo, iowa 50702 (319-291-7321)) was contacted regarding the failure and scheduled the contact an appointment to inspect and replaced the driver's side front tire. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated that there was no warranty coverage. The failure mileage of the oem equipment was initially 4,500. The failure mileage on the driver's side front tire and vehicle was approximately 18,000.

Hankook ventus s1 noble2 (excluded from recall) are wearing extraordinary fast and the rubber is starting to pull apart, flake away. Chucks of rubber are coming off of the tire and leaving holes that appear to be about 1/4 inch deep . This will be our second set of tires with the same issue and the vehicle has only 40,000 miles.

I took my car in for a oil change and my dealer called to inform me i needed to replace all my tires as the treads were all in the unsafe area.the tires are: hankook ventus s1 nobel 2 size 255/50r20 dot 5mnc 1a h 1316 these tires have 23,000 miles on them and came oem on 2017 ford explorer. The tire tread is gone. Premature wear. Please investigate as others are reporting the same exact problem on the same vehicle.see ford bulliton ssm 46905




Read more




© 2024 All rights reserved