We found the following complaints for HANKOOK DYNAPRO AS (Unknown)
Read complaints for HANKOOK DYNAPRO AS (Unknown)
Salvador alarcon who is the owner of alarcon's tire shop was acted deceitfully by having his staff install 235x65x17 vehicle tires on my 2005 nissan pathfinder which uses 265x65x17 tires.these tires not only compromise the safety of my family and myself but cause a significant amount of wear and tear on my vehicle.alarcon's tire shop495 e 26th stogden, ut 84401.
The contact owns a 2007 ford edge.the vehicle has hankook dynapro as, size p235/70r17s tires.while driving 35 mph, the tires do not grip and the abs activates.the contact feels that the stopping distance between his vehicle and others is too excessive.he also feels that the tires are the source of the failure.the current and failure mileages were 1,250.
I bought new a 2007 e350 heavy duty diesel cargo vanthat developed dangerous driving/handling condition at app 75,000 miles. Never a accident, always properly serviced, freeway driving 90% of the time , load evenly dispersed and under weight for e350. It has floaty, drifty, wandering handling at freeway speeds. Constant condition now. Dealer has had van 4-5 times and in their possession for over 40 days off and on. 3 months pursuing the problem. We have replaced bushings, coil springs, shocks, driving gear box and aligned the van 3 times. Ford tech's involved.3 months and $3000.00 expenses incurred, the problem still persists. I dropped the vehicle this week to let the dealer have one more shot to fix the problem or replace the vehicle. My service rep advised me today that the van is driving fine and that it is my imagination that the condition still persists. Argued with me , and informed me they were not going to pursue the problem any further. My ford service dept/ dealer is now flat out denying that the problem exists. At freeway speeds this vehicle is hard to drive without a white knuckle ride. Rides better because of the new shocks and springs but the floaty, wandering drivability still very present and constant at freeway speeds. There are other nhtsa complaints and bulletins regarding this very problem with my same model van. Unacceptable. Dangerous. Van also had tread separation on every factory tire including the spare at 30,000-45,000. Very dangerous.
I bought new a 2007 e350 heavy duty diesel cargo vanthat developed dangerous driving/handling condition at app 75,000 miles. Never a accident, always properly serviced, freeway driving 90% of the time , load evenly dispersed and under weight for e350. It has floaty, drifty, wandering handling at freeway speeds. Constant condition now. Dealer has had van 4-5 times and in their possession for over 40 days off and on. 3 months pursuing the problem. We have replaced bushings, coil springs, shocks, driving gear box and aligned the van 3 times. Ford tech's involved.3 months and $3000.00 expenses incurred, the problem still persists. I dropped the vehicle this week to let the dealer have one more shot to fix the problem or replace the vehicle. My service rep advised me today that the van is driving fine and that it is my imagination that the condition still persists. Argued with me , and informed me they were not going to pursue the problem any further. My ford service dept/ dealer is now flat out denying that the problem exists. At freeway speeds this vehicle is hard to drive without a white knuckle ride. Rides better because of the new shocks and springs but the floaty, wandering drivability still very present and constant at freeway speeds. There are other nhtsa complaints and bulletins regarding this very problem with my same model van. Unacceptable. Dangerous. Van also had tread separation on every factory tire including the spare at 30,000-45,000. Very dangerous.
Tuesday morning when i went out to my truck the tire looked to me to be low on air and low pressure light was on in the truck.i drove to my shop (approx. 7.2 mi.), took off the wheel to check for leaks (found non), checked the air pressure and it was at 28 lbs, i filled the tire with air to 36 lbs. The low pressure indicator light did not go out.i checked the other 3 tires and found them all to be low so i filled them with air to 36 lbs and the light went out.at the end of the day i drove home, then took my wife to dinner (approx. 5 mi.).when we pulled into the restaurant parking lot and turned right into a parking spot, the left front tire blew off the rim as i came to a stop. I am not as concerned about getting a 'free' tire as i am of the safety factor involved. I have 4 hankook tires on this truck and it concerns me that another one may blow apart (possibly at freeway speed).i do believe that this was a defective tire.i am 65 years old and i've worked on cars all my life and i've never seen a tire bead split the way this one did.i also have associates in the automotive business who after seeing the damaged tire completely agree with me.i would hate to see a repeat of the ford explorer tire problem that occurred with firestone several years back; and i hate to think there are more defective tires out there. I spoke with and emailed this information to al abrador at hankook tire and he said 'it was the fault of the person that mounted the tires', he also said that hankook has had no other complaints regarding these tires. I went to the tire shop where i've done business for the past 20 years and they said they had never seen a broken bead like this one.after looking at the nhtsa site i see there are indeed many complaints regarding hankook tires. Again, i am concerned with my own as well as public safety in this matter.
The contact owns a 2004 dodge durango with hankook dynapro tires, line size: 265/65/r17 110s, dot number: t75x jan4607. The contact stated that all four tires were exhibiting bubbles on the side walls. The contact stated that the vehicle was dangerous to drive with the tires in such condition. The manufacturer was contacted but offered no assistance. The failure mileage was 89,000 and the current mileage was 90,000. Kmj
Hankook dynapro as lt245-75/16 tread separation on a 2007 ford e350 superduty van.this was the 4th occurrence of a problem with this brand / model / size tire on a single ford e350 van.one tire failure each year on average.all failures occurred at 15,000-30,000 miles, 7/32 - 10/32 tread depth, while mounted on the rear axle.
My tire valve stems were cracked and leaking on all four tires of my 2007 ford edge and the tire pressure dropped dramatically in one day.when i called my ford dealer they had no idea what i was talking about.i had to have the valve stems replaced on two tires and replace two entire tires at my own expense.
Traveling westbound in hwy 54 east of stratford, tx the left rear tire exploded on our 2008 pleasure-way rv. This rv is built on a ford e350 chassis.the vehicle immediately became uncontrollable and drifted into the path of an oncoming tractor-trailer.driver steered vehicle to the right to avoid the oncoming truck, the rv crossed over the road into a ditch on the right, again turned to the left and re-entered the roadway at a sharp angle causing the vehicle to roll onto its right side. Passenger 1 sustained a broken right shoulder and back injuries, passenger 2 sustained a severely sprained wrist.tire pressure was checked before beginning the trip, and tires were visually inspected at a rest stop 90 minutes before incident. Vehicle was lightly loaded and well below gvwr.these were oem tires with less than 10,000 miles and had always been properly maintained.there was absolutely no warning before the tire failed.
1. Was driving to work in my 2007 ford edge sel with hankook tires, when the low tire pressure indicator light turned on. 2. At work, i found a tire was at 20 psi and leaking from a crack at the base of the valve stem. I inspected the three other stems and found them with cracks at the base of the valve stem.3. I took the car into the local ford dealership. They charged me for the replacement of the leaking valve stem. They did not touch the other three valve stems.the very next day, another valve stem failed and began to leak.
I had filed a complaint #10229285 and nothing has be resolved to date i read others have had similar complaints and all related to ford.
The contact owns a 2008 ford expedition equipped with hankook, tire line dynapro a/s tire size p265/70/r18. The contact stated that while having his tires rotated the mechanic noticed that the front driver side tire had a seem on the inner wall of the tire. The contact mentioned that the tires were not the original ones on the vehicle. The failure mileage was 76,000.
The contact owns hancook dynapro a/s tires, size 235/65/r17, which were equipped on 2010 ford edge. While traveling 55 mph, the contact noticed that the front driver's side tire had blown out. The tire had not been diagnosed and the tire had not been repaired. The current and failure mileages were 18,000. The vin was unavailable.
I bought new a 2007 e350 heavy duty diesel cargo vanthat developed dangerous driving/handling condition at app 75,000 miles. Never a accident, always properly serviced, freeway driving 90% of the time , load evenly dispersed and under weight for e350. It has floaty, drifty, wandering handling at freeway speeds. Constant condition now. Dealer has had van 4-5 times and in their possession for over 40 days off and on. 3 months pursuing the problem. We have replaced bushings, coil springs, shocks, driving gear box and aligned the van 3 times. Ford tech's involved.3 months and $3000.00 expenses incurred, the problem still persists. I dropped the vehicle this week to let the dealer have one more shot to fix the problem or replace the vehicle. My service rep advised me today that the van is driving fine and that it is my imagination that the condition still persists. Argued with me , and informed me they were not going to pursue the problem any further. My ford service dept/ dealer is now flat out denying that the problem exists. At freeway speeds this vehicle is hard to drive without a white knuckle ride. Rides better because of the new shocks and springs but the floaty, wandering drivability still very present and constant at freeway speeds. There are other nhtsa complaints and bulletins regarding this very problem with my same model van. Unacceptable. Dangerous. Van also had tread separation on every factory tire including the spare at 30,000-45,000. Very dangerous.
Hankook dynapro as p255/65sr17 separated at approx. 10,000 miles. Potential for accident since it was a steering tire. Purchased at pepboysstore # 661 tucson, az.
Tire blowout brand:hankookmodel: dynapro asmade: koreadot:t79c pjnh 4008i have had multiple problems with these tires, while driving home my front tire blew out on my 2009 ford f150 truck causing me to hit the side median which then caused my trailer tire to blow out and bent my trailer tires rim as well. When this incident occurred my truck only had a little over 3000 miles on it.i took it to my ford dealer and they argued that some one cut it. When i took it to another tire shop before they even looked at it they said that the rim on the tire had caused the cut. And it indeed was fords fault.i replaced the tire and bought a new one from discount tire. Same brand same model so it would match. Today on jan 14 2010 i took my truck in for an oil change and tire rotation, when they rotated my tires the new tire i bought had a massive ball on the inside of it. The new tire only had 3000 miles of wear.these tires are the stock tires that ford has been using on their f-150 series since 2007 and probably longer.i had a set of these tires on my 2007 f-150 and at 9000 miles they started forming balls on the tires, and the front tires began to cup outward.both trucks i have purchased from spikes ford in mission texas. When i purchased my vehicles theycame with tire road hazard warranty when i took it to ford they told me it was my problem and would not cover anything.in my opinion these problems on two separate vehicles two years apart are a firestone hazard in the making.i like ford vehicles but when someone starts putting my life and others in danger i cant tolerate that. I know that if this incident has occurred to me multiple times with two different f-150s from two different years it has occurred to others as well.
The contact owns a 2005 kia sorento equipped with hankook tires, line dynapro as, size: p245/70/r16. The contact stated that while driving 55 mph, the front driver side tire blew, causing the wheel to become damaged. The contact stated that the tire was a replacement. The dot number was unavailable. The tire mileage was 5,000. The mileage on the vehicle at the time of the failure was 60,000.updated 10/24/12*lj updated 10/25/2012
While rotating my tires the serviceman noticed a bulge on my inside sidewall of the tire.a check of the rest of the tires resulted in three of the tire having a bulge on the inside sidewall, one almost to a point of bursting.i got on the hankook website and noticed that there was a tire recall to almost the same tire.the tire was a 70 and mine is a 65. The description given for the recall is what is happening to mine.the side wall is defective.the tire in question is the hankook 265/65r17 dynapro as.
We've had two valve stem failures on a 2007 ford f-150 truck. The valve stems had multiple cracks and caused the tire to deflate. The failures occurred have occurred on both front tires.
The contact owns a 2007 ford edge.the vehicle has hankook dynapro as, size p235/70r17s tires.while driving 35 mph, the tires do not grip and the abs activates.the contact feels that the stopping distance between his vehicle and others is too excessive.he also feels that the tires are the source of the failure.the current and failure mileages were 1,250.
The contact owns a 2008 ford e-250 with hankook dynapro as tires, size lt245/75/r16, dot number: t7xd5jnh. The contact stated that when driving various speeds, there was a severe thump felt from the rear of the vehicle. After taking the vehicle to an independent mechanic, the contact was advised that the front driver side tire separated and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was taken to certified dealer where the tire was replaced. The failure recurred within a few months. The tire was replaced a second time. Later, the contact experienced the same failure on the front passenger side tire. The manufacturer was contacted and they advised the contact that the failure could have been caused by a defect in the vehicle itself. The failure mileage was approximately 4,000. The tire failure mileage was approximately 3,500.
2008 ford f150 tires, within three months and 283 miles all four of the tires had tread separation and were replaced. ..updated 02/12/15the consumer stated the tread separated on the replacement tires, as well.
My new ford f-150 has original equipped hankook dynapro at tires. They arep235 75 r17 with the dot t79jpcyh (4010). I have a life time maintenance program on the truck and the tires have been checked and rotated at approximately every 4400 miles. With 18,500 miles on the truck and tires, i was driving about 25mph on a city street when the left rear tire blew. It had a clean tear from rim to tread. The truck has low tire pressure monitoring and i had no warning of low pressure so i know the tire was not heating up from low pressure. I did not hit anything on the street ( it is a six lane divided, well traveled street) and suddenly with a loud bang the tire went down. No help from the ford dealer on this problem. The tire dealer i went to was surprised to see passenger tires on a truck.
Flat tire with my 2007 ford edge.same valve was replaced earlier this year.flat again, ford dealership wants me to replace tire.valve was cause of flat.tire is hankook dynapro as// dot 5m7c djnh// p235 65r17103t.same complaints as on internet.
I purchased a f 150 one year ago.i went into a store only to come out to a flat tire (minutes later).i took it to mincz tire, and the problem was a faulty valve stem.the same thing happened days later.all of the valve stems are cracking and must now be replaced.later that week, i saw a television report on faulty valve stems, so i decided to report.
Ford put p-metric tire on a trailer tow package truck after driving for a hour we stop and walk around to check if every thing isokay my tire were wearing very bad i wipe my hand across the tire and had rubber in it. This atfer going through state inspection and passed this wear is on all 4 tire.
When i took my 2007 ford f150 in for tire rotation, the ford technician had said that i had cupped front tires, at that time mire tires had about 9 to 11 thousand miles on them and were only a few months old, ford would not cover the abnormal rounding of the tire and said i should buy some new ones from them.a few months later my other two tires had started forming balls on the inside side wall of the tire, which i was not aware until i went to get my state inspection sticker, the technician at pueblo tires told me i had several balls on the sides of my tires he also told me my vehicle would not pass inspection because the tread was to worn, he even showed me the tread levels with a tread meter and i verified there was not enough tread on the tires.the mileage on the truck at that time was only 15000 miles so i replaced them so it would bass inspection and for my safety and others as well..<br> when i purchased my vehicle it came with a manual stating how much air and how many miles a certain brand of tire was supposed to average mine said i should have gotten 30000 miles minimum before replacement,ford is obviously using false statistics to market these defective tires.
The contact owns a 2006 silveradowith hankook tires, dynapro as size 235/85/r16 (na). She stated the tires were purchased as replacements in 2009. While driving 55 mph, the rear right tire blew; the contact stated this was the second tire that experienced a blowout. The contact stated she changed out the tire with her spare. She did not contact the place where the tires were purchased. The vin was unavailable. The approximate failure mileage was 5,000 and the current mileage was unknown.
A year ago i bought 4 new huncook tires, 4 months ago one got tread separation so i replaced it with a new huncook. Now two days ago another huncook tire got treat sedation. So i can't trust huncook as it's tires are unsafe to drive on. The tire size is 265/70/17
The contact owns a 1999 ford f-350 equipped with hankook dynapro as tires, size: 235/85r16. While driving above 45 mph, the vehicle would swerve uncontrollably. The contact also noticed that the front tires were wearing down quickly and unevenly, but the rear tires showed no failures. The local tire store was contacted and stated that they no longer serviced or sold hankook tires. The contact called the manufacturer and left a voice message. The vehicle failure mileage was 370,000. The tire failure mileage was unknown.
On the way to work in my new car, signal went off for low tire pressure.took to a tire place and the valve stem was leaking air at the point of the join of the tire. I have never in all my years of driving experienced such a thing.
The contact owns a 2003 toyota sequoia equipped with hankook dynapro 110s tires, size p265/65/r17. The contact stated that while changing his brakes, he noticed that the front passenger, front driver, and the rear driver side tires all had separated sidewalls. The vehicle was taken to the dealer. The technician was unable to determine the cause of the failure but advised the contact to replace all tires. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure but did not offer any assistance. The tires were replaced. The dot was not available. The tire failure mileage was 40,000. The failure and current mileage was 160,000.
The contact owns a 2006 ford f-150.the vehicle has hankook dynapro as tires, size p235/75r17.in july of 2007, the contact noticed that one of his tires was flat.ford stated that his negligence caused the flat tire.the tire failure mileage was 3,000.the current vehicle mileage was 3,200 and failure mileage was 3,000.updated 02-01-08.
The contact owns a 2010 dodge journey equipped with hankook dyna pro tires, size 225/70r16. The contact was driving 70 mph when the rear driver side tire blew.the contact merged onto the shoulders and changed the tire. The weather was clear and there was no damage to the vehicle or the tire. The manufacturer was notified who stated that the failure was likely caused by a road hazard and provided no assistance.the tire and vehicle failure mileage was 16,850.
The contact owns a 2003 chevrolet suburban 1500 equipped with hankook dynapro as tires, size pooh/ dot number t79njnh1609. The contact stated he received a voluntary recall from the manufacturer. The vehicle was taken to repair shop for the tires to be inspected. The mechanic stated the tires were not included in the recall. The contact stated he inspected the tires and noticed the tires were in the same dot range. The vehicle was taken back to the repair shop where the technicians stated the tires were included and noticed there was two gashes on the side wall of the reardriver's side tire. The technician stated one gash was approximately six inches long and the other was approximately four inches long. The tire was replaced with the spare tire. The contact had not experienced a failure. The approximate tire mileage was 13,500. The vehicles current mileage was 133,740.
The contact owns a 2006 ford f-250 equipped with hankook tires, size: lt 265/70/17. The contact stated that the tread was separated on the driver's side rear tire and the passenger's side front tires. The tires were replaced. The manufacturer was contacted about the failure. The failure mileage, vin, and dot number were unavailable. ..updated 02/06/14
Salvador alarcon who is the owner of alarcon's tire shop was acted deceitfully by having his staff install 235x65x17 vehicle tires on my 2005 nissan pathfinder which uses 265x65x17 tires.these tires not only compromise the safety of my family and myself but cause a significant amount of wear and tear on my vehicle.alarcon's tire shop495 e 26th stogden, ut 84401.
I am so mad. I thought i was dealing with a great store. Not. First i find out that the tires that they sold be are rated for cars, not full size trucks. Im driving on the interstate and it raining. Im hydroplaning all over the place. I take it to the shop and he tells me that we were lucky that we were not killed. I had a defective tires. And i need to got asap and have them replaced. Im on my way now to go and deal with them. I counted on them to keep my family safe. Just because i am a women they sold me something that i should not have had in the first place.
The contact owns a 2013 ford e-250 equipped with hankook tires, tire line: dynapro as, tire size: lt245/75r16. The contact stated that while driving 65 mph, the rear passengers side tire tread separated from the wheel. The vehicle was taken to a dealer and the tire was not replaced. The failure mileage on both the vehicle and the tires was 11,000.updated 9/4/14the comsumer stated the tire looks as if it contains dry rot. Updated 12/18/2014
2007 ford f150 valve stem broke and caused a blowout on the highway.after recovering from being driven off the road, i noticed that my three other tires had cracked valve stems as well.ford needs to issue an immediate recall and deal with this hazard before someone gets killed or seriously injured.
Valve stem on ford f150 failed resulting ona flat tire on the highway.other three valve stems are currently cracking.
Hankook dynapro as p235-70-r17s tire with approximately 60% wear (according to ford dealership where vehicle was purchased and tires replaced).during normal driving noticed abnormal bumping that appeared to be associated with tire or front end.took vehicle to shop to check balance and wheel alignment.tech found the above described tire had separated and the steel belting was protruding through the tread and top of sidewall.tire was about to fail.driver contacted hankook and forwarded a photograph of the tire to the representative.hankook agreed to a 40% refund of the amount that ford paid (not what i paid) for the tire if i would return the tire or a piece from it containing the dot number.fordtook the tire for return to hankook.three weeks have passed and i have not heard back from ford or hankook.
Purchased a ford e-350 in october of 2005 with 5 hankook lt 245/75 r 16'safter 28,000 miles and 70 % of tread remaining the cord separated in the tire tread caracas resulting in a flat spot corresponding to a bubble on the inside of the tire. When i sought help from hankook national and ms. Judy hershberg 973-633-9000 and the localk distributor miami tire dealers warehouse' jose phone 888-833-3953 i was not assisted in any way, shape, or form, all their suggestions and arrangements fell on deft ears. Considering the mileage, now 34,000 + and the years, 3, i could not in reality expect an adjustment.i would like to report the tires and as much info as i can get from them to you for a possible recall for the sake of public safety and the welfare of citizen drivers and their safety.
I had a valve stem failure which led to a flat tire while driving. When i took the truck in to discount tire to have it checked, they said all of the valve stems were bad and replaced them all. There was no cost to me and no damage. I saw the article in the paper about it and decided to report it for data gathering purposes.
Ford put p-metric tire on a trailer tow package truck after driving for a hour we stop and walk around to check if every thing isokay my tire were wearing very bad i wipe my hand across the tire and had rubber in it. This atfer going through state inspection and passed this wear is on all 4 tire.
Tuesday morning when i went out to my truck the tire looked to me to be low on air and low pressure light was on in the truck.i drove to my shop (approx. 7.2 mi.), took off the wheel to check for leaks (found non), checked the air pressure and it was at 28 lbs, i filled the tire with air to 36 lbs. The low pressure indicator light did not go out.i checked the other 3 tires and found them all to be low so i filled them with air to 36 lbs and the light went out.at the end of the day i drove home, then took my wife to dinner (approx. 5 mi.).when we pulled into the restaurant parking lot and turned right into a parking spot, the left front tire blew off the rim as i came to a stop. I am not as concerned about getting a 'free' tire as i am of the safety factor involved. I have 4 hankook tires on this truck and it concerns me that another one may blow apart (possibly at freeway speed).i do believe that this was a defective tire.i am 65 years old and i've worked on cars all my life and i've never seen a tire bead split the way this one did.i also have associates in the automotive business who after seeing the damaged tire completely agree with me.i would hate to see a repeat of the ford explorer tire problem that occurred with firestone several years back; and i hate to think there are more defective tires out there. I spoke with and emailed this information to al abrador at hankook tire and he said 'it was the fault of the person that mounted the tires', he also said that hankook has had no other complaints regarding these tires. I went to the tire shop where i've done business for the past 20 years and they said they had never seen a broken bead like this one.after looking at the nhtsa site i see there are indeed many complaints regarding hankook tires. Again, i am concerned with my own as well as public safety in this matter.
- the contact owns a 2004 ford f150.the vehicle was in the repair shop for a slow leak on the front passenger side tire so the mechanic plugged the tire. While mounting the tire to the vehicle it exploded. The explosion was caused by separation of the tire beads. The mechanic mounted the spare tire. After driving ten miles the spare tire blew also due to tire bead separation. The tire beads were completely severed in both failures.the failed tire brand is hankook dynapro, size, p235/75r17. The contact was driving 5 mph when the spare tire failed. Updated 2/22/2007 - updated updated 04/16/07
I had filed a complaint #10229285 and nothing has be resolved to date i read others have had similar complaints and all related to ford.
The contact owns a 2007 ford f-150.the vehicle has hankook dynapro as tires, size p235/70r17s.the rear passenger side tire was replaced because it kept leaking air.three hours after the tire was replaced, the contacthad to take it back to be repaired.the three remaining tires have been repaired for the same leakage issue.the sensor light for the tires continuously illuminates.speed was not a factor.the contact intends to take the vehicle to the dealer on march 30, 2008 for the fifth time concerning this failure.the current mileage was 17,000 and failure mileage was 15,000.updated 06/17/08.*ljit was determined that the valve stem was bad.
Tire valves issues on dynapro as hankook p235 70r17 1085 m+s radial tubless rh 0302953 jnh 2606. Leaking air. I am concern that the ford f150 that i own that uses these tires can rollover and hurt or kill my family.
2007 ford f150 valve stem broke and caused a blowout on the highway.after recovering from being driven off the road, i noticed that my three other tires had cracked valve stems as well.ford needs to issue an immediate recall and deal with this hazard before someone gets killed or seriously injured.
I purchased a 2007 ford edge sel plus, and 6 months later i kept getting a low pressure message. I would refill the tire and a day later it was low. I took it in to the dealer and the valve stem was broken, as well as 3 other cracked valve stems. They replaced them all but charged me a discounted rate of $65 for the labor. Ford refused to cover it, and i had very low miles on the car. This was frightening, knowing this was the problem with the explorer in the 1990's.
Tire blowout brand:hankookmodel: dynapro asmade: koreadot:t79c pjnh 4008i have had multiple problems with these tires, while driving home my front tire blew out on my 2009 ford f150 truck causing me to hit the side median which then caused my trailer tire to blow out and bent my trailer tires rim as well. When this incident occurred my truck only had a little over 3000 miles on it.i took it to my ford dealer and they argued that some one cut it. When i took it to another tire shop before they even looked at it they said that the rim on the tire had caused the cut. And it indeed was fords fault.i replaced the tire and bought a new one from discount tire. Same brand same model so it would match. Today on jan 14 2010 i took my truck in for an oil change and tire rotation, when they rotated my tires the new tire i bought had a massive ball on the inside of it. The new tire only had 3000 miles of wear.these tires are the stock tires that ford has been using on their f-150 series since 2007 and probably longer.i had a set of these tires on my 2007 f-150 and at 9000 miles they started forming balls on the tires, and the front tires began to cup outward.both trucks i have purchased from spikes ford in mission texas. When i purchased my vehicles theycame with tire road hazard warranty when i took it to ford they told me it was my problem and would not cover anything.in my opinion these problems on two separate vehicles two years apart are a firestone hazard in the making.i like ford vehicles but when someone starts putting my life and others in danger i cant tolerate that. I know that if this incident has occurred to me multiple times with two different f-150s from two different years it has occurred to others as well.
Traveling westbound in hwy 54 east of stratford, tx the left rear tire exploded on our 2008 pleasure-way rv. This rv is built on a ford e350 chassis.the vehicle immediately became uncontrollable and drifted into the path of an oncoming tractor-trailer.driver steered vehicle to the right to avoid the oncoming truck, the rv crossed over the road into a ditch on the right, again turned to the left and re-entered the roadway at a sharp angle causing the vehicle to roll onto its right side. Passenger 1 sustained a broken right shoulder and back injuries, passenger 2 sustained a severely sprained wrist.tire pressure was checked before beginning the trip, and tires were visually inspected at a rest stop 90 minutes before incident. Vehicle was lightly loaded and well below gvwr.these were oem tires with less than 10,000 miles and had always been properly maintained.there was absolutely no warning before the tire failed.
Dt*: the contact stated while driving 55 mph on the highway, the left front driver side tire sidewall separated without warning.there were no obvious road hazards present.the contact replaced the tire with a spare.the dealer and manufacturer were not alerted.the tire was a hankook, size dynapro as p235/70r17, and dot number of t79cp.
My new ford f-150 has original equipped hankook dynapro at tires. They arep235 75 r17 with the dot t79jpcyh (4010). I have a life time maintenance program on the truck and the tires have been checked and rotated at approximately every 4400 miles. With 18,500 miles on the truck and tires, i was driving about 25mph on a city street when the left rear tire blew. It had a clean tear from rim to tread. The truck has low tire pressure monitoring and i had no warning of low pressure so i know the tire was not heating up from low pressure. I did not hit anything on the street ( it is a six lane divided, well traveled street) and suddenly with a loud bang the tire went down. No help from the ford dealer on this problem. The tire dealer i went to was surprised to see passenger tires on a truck.
The contact owns a 2008 ford expedition equipped with hankook, tire line dynapro a/s tire size p265/70/r18. The contact stated that while having his tires rotated the mechanic noticed that the front driver side tire had a seem on the inner wall of the tire. The contact mentioned that the tires were not the original ones on the vehicle. The failure mileage was 76,000.
While rotating my tires the serviceman noticed a bulge on my inside sidewall of the tire.a check of the rest of the tires resulted in three of the tire having a bulge on the inside sidewall, one almost to a point of bursting.i got on the hankook website and noticed that there was a tire recall to almost the same tire.the tire was a 70 and mine is a 65. The description given for the recall is what is happening to mine.the side wall is defective.the tire in question is the hankook 265/65r17 dynapro as.
The contact owns a 2003 toyota sequoia equipped with hankook dynapro 110s tires, size p265/65/r17. The contact stated that while changing his brakes, he noticed that the front passenger, front driver, and the rear driver side tires all had separated sidewalls. The vehicle was taken to the dealer. The technician was unable to determine the cause of the failure but advised the contact to replace all tires. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure but did not offer any assistance. The tires were replaced. The dot was not available. The tire failure mileage was 40,000. The failure and current mileage was 160,000.
The contact owns a 2004 dodge durango with hankook dynapro tires, line size: 265/65/r17 110s, dot number: t75x jan4607. The contact stated that all four tires were exhibiting bubbles on the side walls. The contact stated that the vehicle was dangerous to drive with the tires in such condition. The manufacturer was contacted but offered no assistance. The failure mileage was 89,000 and the current mileage was 90,000. Kmj
The contact owns a 2003 chevrolet suburban 1500 equipped with hankook dynapro as tires, size pooh/ dot number t79njnh1609. The contact stated he received a voluntary recall from the manufacturer. The vehicle was taken to repair shop for the tires to be inspected. The mechanic stated the tires were not included in the recall. The contact stated he inspected the tires and noticed the tires were in the same dot range. The vehicle was taken back to the repair shop where the technicians stated the tires were included and noticed there was two gashes on the side wall of the reardriver's side tire. The technician stated one gash was approximately six inches long and the other was approximately four inches long. The tire was replaced with the spare tire. The contact had not experienced a failure. The approximate tire mileage was 13,500. The vehicles current mileage was 133,740.
Hankook dynapro as lt245-75/16 tread separation on a 2007 ford e350 superduty van.this was the 4th occurrence of a problem with this brand / model / size tire on a single ford e350 van.one tire failure each year on average.all failures occurred at 15,000-30,000 miles, 7/32 - 10/32 tread depth, while mounted on the rear axle.
The contact owns a 2006 ford f-250 equipped with hankook tires, size: lt 265/70/17. The contact stated that the tread was separated on the driver's side rear tire and the passenger's side front tires. The tires were replaced. The manufacturer was contacted about the failure. The failure mileage, vin, and dot number were unavailable. ..updated 02/06/14
Hankook dynapro as p235-70-r17s tire with approximately 60% wear (according to ford dealership where vehicle was purchased and tires replaced).during normal driving noticed abnormal bumping that appeared to be associated with tire or front end.took vehicle to shop to check balance and wheel alignment.tech found the above described tire had separated and the steel belting was protruding through the tread and top of sidewall.tire was about to fail.driver contacted hankook and forwarded a photograph of the tire to the representative.hankook agreed to a 40% refund of the amount that ford paid (not what i paid) for the tire if i would return the tire or a piece from it containing the dot number.fordtook the tire for return to hankook.three weeks have passed and i have not heard back from ford or hankook.
I am so mad. I thought i was dealing with a great store. Not. First i find out that the tires that they sold be are rated for cars, not full size trucks. Im driving on the interstate and it raining. Im hydroplaning all over the place. I take it to the shop and he tells me that we were lucky that we were not killed. I had a defective tires. And i need to got asap and have them replaced. Im on my way now to go and deal with them. I counted on them to keep my family safe. Just because i am a women they sold me something that i should not have had in the first place.
Hankook dynapro as p255/65sr17 separated at approx. 10,000 miles. Potential for accident since it was a steering tire. Purchased at pepboysstore # 661 tucson, az.
The contact owns a 2013 ford e-250 equipped with hankook tires, tire line: dynapro as, tire size: lt245/75r16. The contact stated that while driving 65 mph, the rear passengers side tire tread separated from the wheel. The vehicle was taken to a dealer and the tire was not replaced. The failure mileage on both the vehicle and the tires was 11,000.updated 9/4/14the comsumer stated the tire looks as if it contains dry rot. Updated 12/18/2014
The contact owns a 2008 ford e-250 with hankook dynapro as tires, size lt245/75/r16, dot number: t7xd5jnh. The contact stated that when driving various speeds, there was a severe thump felt from the rear of the vehicle. After taking the vehicle to an independent mechanic, the contact was advised that the front driver side tire separated and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was taken to certified dealer where the tire was replaced. The failure recurred within a few months. The tire was replaced a second time. Later, the contact experienced the same failure on the front passenger side tire. The manufacturer was contacted and they advised the contact that the failure could have been caused by a defect in the vehicle itself. The failure mileage was approximately 4,000. The tire failure mileage was approximately 3,500.
On the way to work in my new car, signal went off for low tire pressure.took to a tire place and the valve stem was leaking air at the point of the join of the tire. I have never in all my years of driving experienced such a thing.
2007 ford f150 valve stem broke and caused a blowout on the highway.after recovering from being driven off the road, i noticed that my three other tires had cracked valve stems as well.ford needs to issue an immediate recall and deal with this hazard before someone gets killed or seriously injured.
We've had two valve stem failures on a 2007 ford f-150 truck. The valve stems had multiple cracks and caused the tire to deflate. The failures occurred have occurred on both front tires.
1. Was driving to work in my 2007 ford edge sel with hankook tires, when the low tire pressure indicator light turned on. 2. At work, i found a tire was at 20 psi and leaking from a crack at the base of the valve stem. I inspected the three other stems and found them with cracks at the base of the valve stem.3. I took the car into the local ford dealership. They charged me for the replacement of the leaking valve stem. They did not touch the other three valve stems.the very next day, another valve stem failed and began to leak.
The contact owns a 2007 ford f-150.the vehicle has hankook dynapro as tires, size p235/70r17s.the rear passenger side tire was replaced because it kept leaking air.three hours after the tire was replaced, the contacthad to take it back to be repaired.the three remaining tires have been repaired for the same leakage issue.the sensor light for the tires continuously illuminates.speed was not a factor.the contact intends to take the vehicle to the dealer on march 30, 2008 for the fifth time concerning this failure.the current mileage was 17,000 and failure mileage was 15,000.updated 06/17/08.*ljit was determined that the valve stem was bad.
My tire valve stems were cracked and leaking on all four tires of my 2007 ford edge and the tire pressure dropped dramatically in one day.when i called my ford dealer they had no idea what i was talking about.i had to have the valve stems replaced on two tires and replace two entire tires at my own expense.
Valve stem on ford f150 failed resulting ona flat tire on the highway.other three valve stems are currently cracking.
Flat tire with my 2007 ford edge.same valve was replaced earlier this year.flat again, ford dealership wants me to replace tire.valve was cause of flat.tire is hankook dynapro as// dot 5m7c djnh// p235 65r17103t.same complaints as on internet.
Tire valves issues on dynapro as hankook p235 70r17 1085 m+s radial tubless rh 0302953 jnh 2606. Leaking air. I am concern that the ford f150 that i own that uses these tires can rollover and hurt or kill my family.
I had a valve stem failure which led to a flat tire while driving. When i took the truck in to discount tire to have it checked, they said all of the valve stems were bad and replaced them all. There was no cost to me and no damage. I saw the article in the paper about it and decided to report it for data gathering purposes.
I purchased a 2007 ford edge sel plus, and 6 months later i kept getting a low pressure message. I would refill the tire and a day later it was low. I took it in to the dealer and the valve stem was broken, as well as 3 other cracked valve stems. They replaced them all but charged me a discounted rate of $65 for the labor. Ford refused to cover it, and i had very low miles on the car. This was frightening, knowing this was the problem with the explorer in the 1990's.
I purchased a f 150 one year ago.i went into a store only to come out to a flat tire (minutes later).i took it to mincz tire, and the problem was a faulty valve stem.the same thing happened days later.all of the valve stems are cracking and must now be replaced.later that week, i saw a television report on faulty valve stems, so i decided to report.
I had filed a complaint #10229285 and nothing has be resolved to date i read others have had similar complaints and all related to ford.
A year ago i bought 4 new huncook tires, 4 months ago one got tread separation so i replaced it with a new huncook. Now two days ago another huncook tire got treat sedation. So i can't trust huncook as it's tires are unsafe to drive on. The tire size is 265/70/17
Read more
