We found the following complaints for DUNLOP SPORT (Unknown)
Read complaints for DUNLOP SPORT (Unknown)
2002 ford taurus se front drivers side spring snapped. This was recalled in 1999-2001 ford taurus's with the same problem but not the 2002. I have seen many complaints about this when i googled the problem. Please help!!*i couldn't find ford on the manufacture section, so i selected chrysler to proceed.
Problems with tire equipment on the 2002 mazda protege 5. *mr there was difficulty with placing suitcases or boxes into the trunk of this type of vehicle, the cd player skipped, the transmission displayed a loud clunk noise, there was a spare tire problem, there was a nail in the tire which could not be repaired because it was located too close to the edge of the tire, 50% of tread remained, and there was evidence that the wheel needed to have five holes for bolts (spare wheel), and the brakes had 50% remaining.the consumer requested that a memorandum be sent to all mazda dealers explaining the problem, ensure that one or two replacement tires should be stocked due to the extreme difficulties in locating the correct information of the tire and wheel. *sc
Problems with tire equipment on the 2002 mazda protege 5. *mr there was difficulty with placing suitcases or boxes into the trunk of this type of vehicle, the cd player skipped, the transmission displayed a loud clunk noise, there was a spare tire problem, there was a nail in the tire which could not be repaired because it was located too close to the edge of the tire, 50% of tread remained, and there was evidence that the wheel needed to have five holes for bolts (spare wheel), and the brakes had 50% remaining.the consumer requested that a memorandum be sent to all mazda dealers explaining the problem, ensure that one or two replacement tires should be stocked due to the extreme difficulties in locating the correct information of the tire and wheel. *sc
Problems with tire equipment on the 2002 mazda protege 5. *mr there was difficulty with placing suitcases or boxes into the trunk of this type of vehicle, the cd player skipped, the transmission displayed a loud clunk noise, there was a spare tire problem, there was a nail in the tire which could not be repaired because it was located too close to the edge of the tire, 50% of tread remained, and there was evidence that the wheel needed to have five holes for bolts (spare wheel), and the brakes had 50% remaining.the consumer requested that a memorandum be sent to all mazda dealers explaining the problem, ensure that one or two replacement tires should be stocked due to the extreme difficulties in locating the correct information of the tire and wheel. *sc
Problems with tire equipment on the 2002 mazda protege 5. *mr there was difficulty with placing suitcases or boxes into the trunk of this type of vehicle, the cd player skipped, the transmission displayed a loud clunk noise, there was a spare tire problem, there was a nail in the tire which could not be repaired because it was located too close to the edge of the tire, 50% of tread remained, and there was evidence that the wheel needed to have five holes for bolts (spare wheel), and the brakes had 50% remaining.the consumer requested that a memorandum be sent to all mazda dealers explaining the problem, ensure that one or two replacement tires should be stocked due to the extreme difficulties in locating the correct information of the tire and wheel. *sc
On june 13th 2005 my audi a6 2.7 t was serviced at desert audi here in las vegas. A 30,000 mile service was conducted (@28,256) which per their service menu included examining my tires, suspension and a visual assessment of alignment.on september 14th 2005 i had a low speed front passenger side tire blow-out.the tire actually completely tore apart on the inside wall of the tire at the tread margin.my vehicle was towed to the audi dealer and they indicated that they didn't sell tires, the closest tire store also found that the other front tire had an unusual wear pattern on the inside wall of the tire and recommended replacement. They told me my car was severely out of alignment, mileage 30,258.i took my audi back to desert audi and explained what had happened.without acknowledging how significant tire wear was not noted <3 months and < 2, 000 miles before, they assessed the alignment and told me there was no alignment problem and in their opinion i had some bad tires. Now the tires were the original tires that came on the vehicle, dunlop high speed rated tires sport 9090-235/45zr17-94y.the decision about which tires to put on vehicles sold or leased in the us in undoubtedly was made by someone or by a contractual arrangement; i certainly wasn't asked what tires i wanted on my audi.upon contacting the tire company that someone at audi decided to use and entrust the overall safety of the vehicle to, i expected some level of service and concern over what had happened. I made numerous phone calls (file# 792313, dunlop tire corp). Was sent over to a goodyear tire dealer and was again told that the problem was with my audi.thetire contractor dunlop/goodyear explained to me that the audifactory certified technicians don't know anything about car alignments and that they would need to check my alignment. The alignment was still fine, so they decided it was something i did and essentially refused to offer any viable solution.
2002 ford taurus se front drivers side spring snapped. This was recalled in 1999-2001 ford taurus's with the same problem but not the 2002. I have seen many complaints about this when i googled the problem. Please help!!*i couldn't find ford on the manufacture section, so i selected chrysler to proceed.
On april 21, 2010, i took my wife's hyundai genesis in for servicing. The previous servicing was done at 8,936 and there was no wear problem involving any of the tires.the mileage on april 21 was 13,839; less than 5,000 additional miles.at this appointment i was informed that all four tires no longer met minimum tread standards for safe operation.in fact, areas of the tires had no tread at all and the dealer invoice stated that the "tires require immediate replacement."even though i have an extended warranty on this vehicle, i was informed that hyundai does not warrant the tires on the genesis.i expressed to the dealership that they had put my family's safety at risk -- with my wife driving our grandchildren around town on less than a measurable level of tread, posing a dangerous safety situation, with no knowledge of what was occurring to the rubber.the dealership, through its sales manager, did not want to address the safety issues involving its tires.the response was "it's not our problem."i believe it is hyundai's problem.after subsequently checking general websites, the tire issue is one they are aware of.however, they appear to be waiting until someone suffers a loss of control, a blowout, or an accident possibly resulting in a death before they take action.i believe hyundai of america and its dealerships:1. Are deceptive in their advertising practices. 2. Knowingly placing a defective product on their genesis vehicles. 3. Actions are fraudulent, since they do not disclose to consumers that they do not warrant the tires on the genesis. 4. Should be issues a "cease and desist order" involving these tires ( dunlop, sport 5000, p235/50r18). And5.the nhtsa fine hyundai for their civil, and potentially criminal, fraudulent conduct by knowingly violating national safety standards.additionally, i am making a claim to hyundai for reimbursement of the $736 i had to pay for new tires.(i kept the worn tires to prove my case.)
Treads separated on both front left and front right tires along on inside edge of each while driving on interstate 93 in nh. One threw cord, the other showed separation upon examination. Dealer [lakes region audi, gilford nh] checked inflation, at 31.2 and 31.4lb (recommended pressure is 32lb). Moderate tread wear (4/32in left?) after 30k mi. Dealer also performed re-alignment after new tires were installed, but found no serious problem (minor toe-in adj). This car is driven mostly in washington dc where it has been very hot recently, but these are temperature category a tires. Same failure on both front tires at same time suggests a possible manufacturing defect.
Failure of tires.
Dt: the consumers vehicle did not have a spare tire.the consumer experienced a blow out on a tire that was not suppose to go flat. The dealer said it would take a few days to get a new tire. Manufacturer advised the consumer to call the tire manufacturer. Dunlop tire was not helpful. The consumer said no one was qualified to fix that kind of tire, and no one carried it in stock in his area. Dunlop run flat tires #sp4000, pooh/.the vehicle was equipped with run flat tires, however when the consumer attempted to drive on the tire, it blew out. The consumer stated it was obvious one could not drive 100 miles on the tire as stated in the owners manual.
My motorcycle's front tire developed a very large blister approximately 2" wide by 7-8" long by 2" high this type of failure of the tread could easily be disastrous on a motorcycle. I've attempted to make contact with someone from dunlop about this defect with no response.
Tires on suv does not support the weight of the vehicle.the consumers 2004 vw toureg needed new tires at 11000 miles.the tires the vehicle came with weredunlop 255/60r17 106h.the consumer stated that the book gives an example of an 18 inch tire stating that consumersshould make sure the tire supports the weight of the vehicle.*tc
The tire completely separately from the sidewalks on both sides. I heard a pop sound and within 15second i loss control of my car 2015 mazda 6 i have pictures of the incident
2003 bmw 330xi. Consumer writes in regards to spontaneous catastrophic tire failure *tgwthe consumer stated the tire failure occurred on his daughter's vehicle in may of this year. The entire sidewall of the tire failed,creating a void around the outside circumference of the tire, about mid-way between the bead and tread lines.the consumer stated it appeared the sidewall piles simply gave way and without that internal structural integrity, the tire suddenly lost air. The consumer took the vehicle to a local discount tire store for an inspection. The technician did not observe any road trauma or external reason for the sudden failure. The tires were virtually new.the technician concluded, the failure was due to a manufacturing defect on dunplop's part. Dunlop refused to investigate the failure, because the consumer was not the original purchaser and the tires had been purchased by the original owner more than six years ago.
Tire has premature separation of tread.
Problems with tire equipment on the 2002 mazda protege 5. *mr there was difficulty with placing suitcases or boxes into the trunk of this type of vehicle, the cd player skipped, the transmission displayed a loud clunk noise, there was a spare tire problem, there was a nail in the tire which could not be repaired because it was located too close to the edge of the tire, 50% of tread remained, and there was evidence that the wheel needed to have five holes for bolts (spare wheel), and the brakes had 50% remaining.the consumer requested that a memorandum be sent to all mazda dealers explaining the problem, ensure that one or two replacement tires should be stocked due to the extreme difficulties in locating the correct information of the tire and wheel. *sc
Frequent loss of air pressure in tire.local tire company checks tire and reported that it is defective.replaced tire.
2004 bmw 530i developed problems with the tire equipment.*mrthe consumer discovered the right rear tire was flat and it was also worn down to the steel belts on the inside of the tire. The front tires also showed signs of wear on the inside.
Goodyear dunlop tire blewout.while driving the vehicle's driver's side front tire blewout.as a result the vehicle hit a curb and went off the road damaging the front end and underbody of the vehicle.the driver hit her head on the steering vheel upon impact.the consumer request reimbursement from the manufacturer but was denied (dunlop sport 9000, 205/45zr17 88w sp high performance reinforced tire).
2000, mazda, mpv; tire size p215/60r16, original equipment, dot# unavailable. Vehiclevibrates while driving at 30 or more mp. ; dealer notified, and replaced tires. Provide any further information.
Consumer cannot find the model of dunlop tires she purchased.***no answer required***.*mrdunlop 88v st sport fm 501.
The dealer atlantic subaru (124 waterhouse rd bourne, ma 02532).sold me a used 2007 bmw x5 with tires below 2/32.it is my understanding that in ma they need to be 4/32 to the wear bar.i have documentation from my bmw dealer showing the correct depth.this car was represented as to have not been in an accident and once it arrived it was obviously repaired.do i have any recourse with you?[xxx]information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
Tires are unsafe dangerous and should not be manufactured.no traction in wet, snow or ice, constant pulling in the wheel due to the tire tread design, prior set on daughters car lasted only 19,000 miles, this tire has a manufacturer defect and should be recalled for safety reasons,
Tl - the contact owns a 2002 nissan altima equipped with dunlop, tire line: sports 7000, and tire size 215/60r16. The contact stated that when driving the vehicle would shake shimmy and sway. The contact took the vehicle to a mechanic and the diagnosis was the tires was feathering. The contact mentioned the tires had a bump in the tired. The tires were not replaced. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage of the tires was unavailable and the vehicle was 221,947. Bt
I've recently purchased a honda fit sport 2010, about 6 months ago, the mileage is at 7,000 miles.last night,the driver's side tire completely blew out while i was driving on the freeway.
2002 ford taurus se front drivers side spring snapped. This was recalled in 1999-2001 ford taurus's with the same problem but not the 2002. I have seen many complaints about this when i googled the problem. Please help!!*i couldn't find ford on the manufacture section, so i selected chrysler to proceed.
I took my car in for an oil change and asked them to check my tires due to my pressure light being on and the car was driving funny.upon inspection it was discovered that there was a busted belt in the sidewall.this is the second tire i have had to replace in two months. Also, it was stated at this time that my car will not pass inspection due to wear on the tread and i will need to buy new tires before re-registering my vehicle.car is less than one year old with under 20,000 miles.
Dunlop sp sport 5000 dsst p245/40rf19 developed sidewall bubble spontaneously. These tires were standard when the car was purchased new.i have seen numerous reports of similar complaints of sidewall bubbles following pothole encounters. Tires had only 17,500 miles on them.the fact that there are so many similar complaints leads me to believe there is a manufacturing issue.
Defect in dunlop sport 7000 a/s tire: tire sidewall bulged out from the inside of the tire.size of bulge is approx 1.5 in x 2.0 in.rubber exterior wall of tire appears as frayed.there were no accidents or other known causes of the bulge or fraying.tire was 6 months old and had 8600 miles, mostly suburban driving (some highway/interstate), driven under normal driving conditions.the defect was discovered when the car's sensor showing tire air pressure indicated low pressure in at least one tire; visual inspection immediately revealed the defect; tire pressure had dropped to 22 psi, probably over a period of 2-3 days.no injuries, accidents or other property damage caused by defect due to alert provided by tire pressure sensor.dunlop offered to repair/replace the defective tire under warranty; offer declined, and owner replaced all four (relatively new) dunlop tires with other brand tires.all four original tires have been discarded, but photos of the defective tire are available for inspection.owner telephoned dunlop to notify manufacturer of the defect sept 20, 2011 11:40 a.m. Edt.
Consistent bubbles on stock dunlop sport tires.i have replaced them approximately 5 times with only 27,000 miles on the vehicle.
Tire had a 1/16 inch wideby 1/2 inch length slit near the rim. Went to the tire manufacturer and i was told it was not a defect. When i first saw the slit, it was like a pulled tissue paper. Now it is two inches long. I got it replaced at a cost.
2006 kawasaki concours with dunlop sport radial tires.k701f in front, k700j in rear.these tires track severely on rain grooves on california highways.i have 30 years experience driving motorcycles and have never been so scared by how a tire behaved over rain grooves until i bought this bike.i went to the dealer today to complain and there was a bike like mine with 700 miles on it getting it's tires changed because the owner couldn't stand how these tires tracked in rain grooves.this is the most unsettling situation you can imagine i thought i had two flat tires the first time i drove it on the highway, then i thought maybe the swingarm was loose.just when i went to pull over i hit a section of blacktop and it smoothed out.i can't express enough how bad these tires are and they should never be on a motorcycle.
Large bulges on the sidewall of tires.
The contact owns a 2009 lexus gs350 equipped with dunlop sport p225/50/r17 tires. The contact noticed that the front passenger and rear drivers side tires displayed blisters on the sidewalls. The dealer stated that the tires needed to be replaced at the contacts expense. The tires were not replaced when the complaint was filed. The failure and current mileages were 6,224. The vin and dot numbers were unavailable when the complaint was filed.
Tl - the contact owns a 2002 nissan altima equipped with dunlop, tire line: sports 7000, and tire size 215/60r16. The contact stated that when driving the vehicle would shake shimmy and sway. The contact took the vehicle to a mechanic and the diagnosis was the tires was feathering. The contact mentioned the tires had a bump in the tired. The tires were not replaced. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage of the tires was unavailable and the vehicle was 221,947. Bt
Failure of tires.
The contact owns a 2010 infiniti g37 equipped with dunlop sp sport maxx (na) tires, size p225/50r18 (na). While driving 65 mph, the contact felt rumbling underneath the vehicle. The contact pulled over to the shoulder of the road and noticed that the rear driver side tire was destroyed. The contact stated that the tire was replaced by an independent mechanic who confirmed that the sidewall detached from the tread of the tire. The tire was original equipment. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage of the tire and vehicle was 15,000. The dot number and vin were not available.
On june 13th 2005 my audi a6 2.7 t was serviced at desert audi here in las vegas. A 30,000 mile service was conducted (@28,256) which per their service menu included examining my tires, suspension and a visual assessment of alignment.on september 14th 2005 i had a low speed front passenger side tire blow-out.the tire actually completely tore apart on the inside wall of the tire at the tread margin.my vehicle was towed to the audi dealer and they indicated that they didn't sell tires, the closest tire store also found that the other front tire had an unusual wear pattern on the inside wall of the tire and recommended replacement. They told me my car was severely out of alignment, mileage 30,258.i took my audi back to desert audi and explained what had happened.without acknowledging how significant tire wear was not noted <3 months and < 2, 000 miles before, they assessed the alignment and told me there was no alignment problem and in their opinion i had some bad tires. Now the tires were the original tires that came on the vehicle, dunlop high speed rated tires sport 9090-235/45zr17-94y.the decision about which tires to put on vehicles sold or leased in the us in undoubtedly was made by someone or by a contractual arrangement; i certainly wasn't asked what tires i wanted on my audi.upon contacting the tire company that someone at audi decided to use and entrust the overall safety of the vehicle to, i expected some level of service and concern over what had happened. I made numerous phone calls (file# 792313, dunlop tire corp). Was sent over to a goodyear tire dealer and was again told that the problem was with my audi.thetire contractor dunlop/goodyear explained to me that the audifactory certified technicians don't know anything about car alignments and that they would need to check my alignment. The alignment was still fine, so they decided it was something i did and essentially refused to offer any viable solution.
The contact owns a 2006 mazda 5.the vehicle has dunlop signature sport, size 205/50/r17 tires (na).while having the tires routinely serviced, the inspector noticed that the wires on all four tires were sticking out of the sidewalls.the mazda dealer replaced two tires as a free remedy and the other two were repaired at the consumer's expense.three months later, the front passenger side tire went entirely flat.he then took the vehicle back to the dealer and was informed that the sidewall had completely split and was not able to be repaired.the tire was replaced.the manufacturer stated that they were aware of the failure, but there were no recalls available.all five tires that were replaced on the vehicle were identical.the transmission type was unknown.the failure mileage was 15,000 and current mileage was 21,000.
Defect in dunlop sport 7000 a/s tire: tire sidewall bulged out from the inside of the tire.size of bulge is approx 1.5 in x 2.0 in.rubber exterior wall of tire appears as frayed.there were no accidents or other known causes of the bulge or fraying.tire was 6 months old and had 8600 miles, mostly suburban driving (some highway/interstate), driven under normal driving conditions.the defect was discovered when the car's sensor showing tire air pressure indicated low pressure in at least one tire; visual inspection immediately revealed the defect; tire pressure had dropped to 22 psi, probably over a period of 2-3 days.no injuries, accidents or other property damage caused by defect due to alert provided by tire pressure sensor.dunlop offered to repair/replace the defective tire under warranty; offer declined, and owner replaced all four (relatively new) dunlop tires with other brand tires.all four original tires have been discarded, but photos of the defective tire are available for inspection.owner telephoned dunlop to notify manufacturer of the defect sept 20, 2011 11:40 a.m. Edt.
Dunlop sp sport 5000 dsst p245/40rf19 developed sidewall bubble spontaneously. These tires were standard when the car was purchased new.i have seen numerous reports of similar complaints of sidewall bubbles following pothole encounters. Tires had only 17,500 miles on them.the fact that there are so many similar complaints leads me to believe there is a manufacturing issue.
Large bulges on the sidewall of tires.
Consistent bubbles on stock dunlop sport tires.i have replaced them approximately 5 times with only 27,000 miles on the vehicle.
Tire had a 1/16 inch wideby 1/2 inch length slit near the rim. Went to the tire manufacturer and i was told it was not a defect. When i first saw the slit, it was like a pulled tissue paper. Now it is two inches long. I got it replaced at a cost.
2003 bmw 330xi. Consumer writes in regards to spontaneous catastrophic tire failure *tgwthe consumer stated the tire failure occurred on his daughter's vehicle in may of this year. The entire sidewall of the tire failed,creating a void around the outside circumference of the tire, about mid-way between the bead and tread lines.the consumer stated it appeared the sidewall piles simply gave way and without that internal structural integrity, the tire suddenly lost air. The consumer took the vehicle to a local discount tire store for an inspection. The technician did not observe any road trauma or external reason for the sudden failure. The tires were virtually new.the technician concluded, the failure was due to a manufacturing defect on dunplop's part. Dunlop refused to investigate the failure, because the consumer was not the original purchaser and the tires had been purchased by the original owner more than six years ago.
The contact owns a 2009 lexus gs350 equipped with dunlop sport p225/50/r17 tires. The contact noticed that the front passenger and rear drivers side tires displayed blisters on the sidewalls. The dealer stated that the tires needed to be replaced at the contacts expense. The tires were not replaced when the complaint was filed. The failure and current mileages were 6,224. The vin and dot numbers were unavailable when the complaint was filed.
I took my car in for an oil change and asked them to check my tires due to my pressure light being on and the car was driving funny.upon inspection it was discovered that there was a busted belt in the sidewall.this is the second tire i have had to replace in two months. Also, it was stated at this time that my car will not pass inspection due to wear on the tread and i will need to buy new tires before re-registering my vehicle.car is less than one year old with under 20,000 miles.
I have a dunlop d208 190/50 motorcycle tire where the carcass is separating through the tread.it is starting on both outside edge and working toward the center, pictures available.
The dealer atlantic subaru (124 waterhouse rd bourne, ma 02532).sold me a used 2007 bmw x5 with tires below 2/32.it is my understanding that in ma they need to be 4/32 to the wear bar.i have documentation from my bmw dealer showing the correct depth.this car was represented as to have not been in an accident and once it arrived it was obviously repaired.do i have any recourse with you?[xxx]information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
Treads separated on both front left and front right tires along on inside edge of each while driving on interstate 93 in nh. One threw cord, the other showed separation upon examination. Dealer [lakes region audi, gilford nh] checked inflation, at 31.2 and 31.4lb (recommended pressure is 32lb). Moderate tread wear (4/32in left?) after 30k mi. Dealer also performed re-alignment after new tires were installed, but found no serious problem (minor toe-in adj). This car is driven mostly in washington dc where it has been very hot recently, but these are temperature category a tires. Same failure on both front tires at same time suggests a possible manufacturing defect.
My motorcycle's front tire developed a very large blister approximately 2" wide by 7-8" long by 2" high this type of failure of the tread could easily be disastrous on a motorcycle. I've attempted to make contact with someone from dunlop about this defect with no response.
Tire has premature separation of tread.
Dunlop tires wear out prematurely on the inner tread. If undetected blow-out can result.i have had to replace two sets of tires in less than 40,000 miles;.
On april 21, 2010, i took my wife's hyundai genesis in for servicing. The previous servicing was done at 8,936 and there was no wear problem involving any of the tires.the mileage on april 21 was 13,839; less than 5,000 additional miles.at this appointment i was informed that all four tires no longer met minimum tread standards for safe operation.in fact, areas of the tires had no tread at all and the dealer invoice stated that the "tires require immediate replacement."even though i have an extended warranty on this vehicle, i was informed that hyundai does not warrant the tires on the genesis.i expressed to the dealership that they had put my family's safety at risk -- with my wife driving our grandchildren around town on less than a measurable level of tread, posing a dangerous safety situation, with no knowledge of what was occurring to the rubber.the dealership, through its sales manager, did not want to address the safety issues involving its tires.the response was "it's not our problem."i believe it is hyundai's problem.after subsequently checking general websites, the tire issue is one they are aware of.however, they appear to be waiting until someone suffers a loss of control, a blowout, or an accident possibly resulting in a death before they take action.i believe hyundai of america and its dealerships:1. Are deceptive in their advertising practices. 2. Knowingly placing a defective product on their genesis vehicles. 3. Actions are fraudulent, since they do not disclose to consumers that they do not warrant the tires on the genesis. 4. Should be issues a "cease and desist order" involving these tires ( dunlop, sport 5000, p235/50r18). And5.the nhtsa fine hyundai for their civil, and potentially criminal, fraudulent conduct by knowingly violating national safety standards.additionally, i am making a claim to hyundai for reimbursement of the $736 i had to pay for new tires.(i kept the worn tires to prove my case.)
Dunlop sport a2 tires ------ had flat tire ------ dealer noted excessive treadwear on tire----- recoommended replacement-----company refused----said i had to wait till tread is 3/32 ----tires have 12 000 miles----with 50 000 mile wear out warranty.currently 6/32 of tread left
Problems with tire equipment on the 2002 mazda protege 5. *mr there was difficulty with placing suitcases or boxes into the trunk of this type of vehicle, the cd player skipped, the transmission displayed a loud clunk noise, there was a spare tire problem, there was a nail in the tire which could not be repaired because it was located too close to the edge of the tire, 50% of tread remained, and there was evidence that the wheel needed to have five holes for bolts (spare wheel), and the brakes had 50% remaining.the consumer requested that a memorandum be sent to all mazda dealers explaining the problem, ensure that one or two replacement tires should be stocked due to the extreme difficulties in locating the correct information of the tire and wheel. *sc
Read more
