We found the following complaints for BILSTEIN STRUT 35-110767 (Unknown)
Read complaints for BILSTEIN STRUT 35-110767 (Unknown)
The contact owns a 2007 mazda speed3. The contact stated that the aftermarket bilstein strut (model number: 35-110767was not compatible to the vehicle. The contact stated that after installing the front driver's side strut, he noticed that when driving various speeds over a road bump, a noise emitted from the front end of the vehicle in a bouncing motion. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the problem. The approximate failure mileage was 60,000.
Purchased bilstein shocks for ford ranger 95 xlt 2wd 6cyl 4.0 3 years ago front shocks went soft after 5k miles. Persevered and purchased new front shocks [bilstein] a few months ago. Front shocks substandard. Contacted bilstein. Sent all 6 shocks in. Received 6 replacement shocks. Front shocks are substandard. Took vehicle to reputable mechanic in austin. Concerns were verified. Contacted bilstein with information. My patience has run out. This is a standard pickup. Standard suspension highway use only. 10k miles per year. Numbers on shock absorber box are: 24-022361 and f4-b46-2236-h1 i consider this a safety issue. Braking and handling of my vehicle are compromised. Are there other complaints about these shocks? i am in possession of the brand new unused pair of front shocks supplied by bilstein i could submit for independent testing. I would also be able to take my vehicle to any independent mechanic to verify this problem.
I am currently employed as quality assurance,for an automotive aftermarket rebuilder?.the short story, they falsely advertise their partsare "completely rebuilt" when in reality they arepainted and reboxed old stock, no remanufacturing involved. Here is another erroneous direct quote from there salesmaterial? our engineers tirelessly investigate and test these used xxxxxxxxxxxparts to document failure points. Thanks to this research they have discovered that not only can xxxxxxxduplicate the original equipment products, but in many cases they can improve upon existing original equipment suspension designs. I assure you there are no engineers employed directly or indirectly by this company, neither is there any documentation of testing.because no testing is done on the parts. This is such a blatant case of fraud, the owners assure themselves they are in the right because their industry is not directly regulated by the federal government. Last week i forwarded an article stating that federal regulations are now being applied to this area of remanufacture,last friday i was written up for gross misconduct?i.e. ?talking to employees?, ?calling myself the quality assurance mgr.?, and ?inappropriate e-mail to human resources? (she was due for an internal audit, i asked when the audit could be completed) they obviously have a new agenda, much different from when i was hired to implement iso/ts 16949:2009i believe they have found it much more lucrative to sell old parts in a new box then to test, document, and discard bad parts. Last month 10,000 air bags were recalled by goodyear without proper notification, i have thousands of return part numbers and customer namesthe commitment to customer qualityis non-existent,by default making the customer himself the quality assurance mgr.and our highways and its citizens extremely unsafe.
I am currently employed as quality assurance,for an automotive aftermarket rebuilder?.the short story, they falsely advertise their partsare "completely rebuilt" when in reality they arepainted and reboxed old stock, no remanufacturing involved. Here is another erroneous direct quote from there salesmaterial? our engineers tirelessly investigate and test these used xxxxxxxxxxxparts to document failure points. Thanks to this research they have discovered that not only can xxxxxxxduplicate the original equipment products, but in many cases they can improve upon existing original equipment suspension designs. I assure you there are no engineers employed directly or indirectly by this company, neither is there any documentation of testing.because no testing is done on the parts. This is such a blatant case of fraud, the owners assure themselves they are in the right because their industry is not directly regulated by the federal government. Last week i forwarded an article stating that federal regulations are now being applied to this area of remanufacture,last friday i was written up for gross misconduct?i.e. ?talking to employees?, ?calling myself the quality assurance mgr.?, and ?inappropriate e-mail to human resources? (she was due for an internal audit, i asked when the audit could be completed) they obviously have a new agenda, much different from when i was hired to implement iso/ts 16949:2009i believe they have found it much more lucrative to sell old parts in a new box then to test, document, and discard bad parts. Last month 10,000 air bags were recalled by goodyear without proper notification, i have thousands of return part numbers and customer namesthe commitment to customer qualityis non-existent,by default making the customer himself the quality assurance mgr.and our highways and its citizens extremely unsafe.
Purchased bilstein shocks for ford ranger 95 xlt 2wd 6cyl 4.0 3 years ago front shocks went soft after 5k miles. Persevered and purchased new front shocks [bilstein] a few months ago. Front shocks substandard. Contacted bilstein. Sent all 6 shocks in. Received 6 replacement shocks. Front shocks are substandard. Took vehicle to reputable mechanic in austin. Concerns were verified. Contacted bilstein with information. My patience has run out. This is a standard pickup. Standard suspension highway use only. 10k miles per year. Numbers on shock absorber box are: 24-022361 and f4-b46-2236-h1 i consider this a safety issue. Braking and handling of my vehicle are compromised. Are there other complaints about these shocks? i am in possession of the brand new unused pair of front shocks supplied by bilstein i could submit for independent testing. I would also be able to take my vehicle to any independent mechanic to verify this problem.
Read more
